J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2018 Apr;56(2):166-172. 10.4047/jkap.2018.56.2.166.

Aesthetic restoration n patients with unaesthetic maxillary anterior teeth using double scan : A case report

• Ko CW
• Kim MJ
• Yang HS
• Park SW
• Park C
• Yun KD

• KMID: 2410121
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4047/jkap.2018.56.2.166

Abstract

In case of the treatment of maxillary anterior teeth, it should be taken into account the proper morphology, arrangement and color satisfying patient's esthetic demands. For this purpose, facial composition, dentofacial composition, dental composition and dentogingival composition should be considered making diagnosis and treatment plan in an esthetic point of view. In adjustable temporary crown state, careful evaluation and correction of the esthetic and functional aspect were performed, and the definite restoration was reproduced using double scan.

Keyword

Double scanning; Computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM); Esthetic analysis

MeSH Terms

Crowns
Diagnosis
Humans
Tooth*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Initial standard radiograph.

• 

  Fig. 2. Intraoral photograph of 1st visit (Frontal view).

• 

  Fig. 3. Dental axis analysis.

• 

  Fig. 4. Gingival line analysis.

• 

  Fig. 5. (A) Nasolabial angle, (B) Rickett's E-plane analysis.

• 

  Fig. 6. (A) Smile line, (B) Overjet, (C) Median line analysis.

• 

  Fig. 7. 2nd Temporary crown setting. (A) Frontal view, (B) Lateral view, (C) 2nd Temporary crown.

• 

  Fig. 8. Definitive prosthesis by double scanning of 2nd provisional restoration.

• 

  Fig. 9. Definitive restoration. (A) Before restoration, (B) After restoration.

Reference

1.Davis LG., Ashworth PD., Spriggs LS. Psychological effects of aesthetic dental treatment. J Dent. 1998. 26:547–54.

2.Ahmad I. Geometric considerations in anterior dental aesthetics: restorative principles. Pract Periodontics Aesthet Dent. 1998. 10:813–22.

3.Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: facial perspective. Br Dent J. 2005. 199:15–21.

4.Ahmad I. Anterior dental aesthetics: gingival perspective. Br Dent J. 2005. 199:195–202.

5.Dawson PE. Determining the determinants of occlusion. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1983. 3:8–21.

6.Yang DH., Yang HS., Park SW., Lim HP., Yun KD., Vang MS. Full mouth implant rehabilitation with double scanning of provisional restoration. J Korean Acad Prosthodont. 2014. 52:252–7.

7.Karl M., Graef F., Wichmann M., Krafft T. Passivity of fit of CAD/CAM and copy-milled frameworks, veneered frameworks, and anatomically contoured, zirconia ceramic, implant-supported fixed prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2012. 107:232–8.

8.Fradeani M. Estehtic rehabilitation in fixed prosthodontics. Volume 1. Estehtic analysis: a systematic approach to pros-theric treatment. Chicago: Quintessence;2004. p. 16–31.

9.Matthews TG. The anatomy of a smile. J Prosthet Dent. 1978. 39:128–34.

10.Seo JM. Full mouth rehabilitation in a patient with severely worn dentition. J Dent Rehabil Appl Sci. 2010. 26:463–76.

11.Triwatana P., Nagaviroj N., Tulapornchai C. Clinical performance and failures of zirconia-based fixed partial dentures: a review literature. J Adv Prosthodont. 2012. 4:76–83.

12.Herrguth M., Wichmann M., Reich S. The aesthetics of all-ceramic veneered and monolithic CAD/CAM crowns. J Oral Rehabil. 2005. 32:747–52.