1. Reginelli A, Santagata M, Urraro F, Somma F, Izzo A, Cappabianca S, et al. Foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region: assessment with multidetector computed tomography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2015; 36:2–7. PMID:
25639172.
Article
2. Valizadeh S, Pouraliakbar H, Kiani L, Safi Y, Alibakhshi L. Evaluation of visibility of foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region: comparison of computed tomography, cone beam computed tomography, ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging. Iran J Radiol. 2016; 13:e37265. PMID:
27895878.
Article
3. Aras MH, Miloglu O, Barutcugil C, Kantarci M, Ozcan E, Harorli A. Comparison of the sensitivity for detecting foreign bodies among conventional plain radiography, computed tomography and ultrasonography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2010; 39:72–78. PMID:
20100917.
Article
4. Omezli MM, Torul D, Sivrikaya EC. The prevalence of foreign bodies in jaw bones on panoramic radiography. Indian J Dent. 2015; 6:185–189. PMID:
26752878.
Article
5. Ober CP, Jones JC, Larson MM, Lanz OI, Werre SR. Comparison of ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in detection of acute wooden foreign bodies in the canine manus. Vet Radiol Ultrasound. 2008; 49:411–418. PMID:
18833946.
Article
6. Eggers G, Mukhamadiev D, Hassfeld S. Detection of foreign bodies of the head with digital volume tomography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2005; 34:74–79. PMID:
15829688.
Article
7. Haghnegahdar A, Shakibafard A, Khosravifard N. Comparison between computed tomography and ultrasonography in detecting foreign bodies regarding their composition and depth: an in vitro study. J Dent (Shiraz). 2016; 17:177–184. PMID:
27602392.
8. Oikarinen KS, Nieminen TM, Mäkäräinen H, Pyhtinen J. Visibility of foreign bodies in soft tissue in plain radiographs, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound. An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1993; 22:119–124. PMID:
8320449.
9. Kaviani F, Javad Rashid R, Shahmoradi Z, Gholamian M. Detection of foreign bodies by spiral computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography in maxillofacial regions. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects. 2014; 8:166–171. PMID:
25346836.
10. Javadrashid R, Fouladi DF, Golamian M, Hajalioghli P, Daghighi MH, Shahmorady Z, et al. Visibility of different foreign bodies in the maxillofacial region using plain radiography, CT, MRI and ultrasonography: an in vitro study. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015; 44:20140229. PMID:
25426703.
11. Gomaa M, Abdelaal A. Ultrasonography versus radiography in detection of different foreign bodies in a cadaveric calf thigh specimen. Res J Vet Pract. 2015; 3:83–88.
Article
12. Holmes PJ, Miller JR, Gutta R, Louis PJ. Intraoperative imaging techniques: a guide to retrieval of foreign bodies. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2005; 100:614–618. PMID:
16243249.
Article
13. White SC, Pharaoh MJ. Oral radiology, principles and interpretations. St. Louis: Mosby;2014. p. 111–220.
14. Javadrashid R, Golamian M, Shahrzad M, Hajalioghli P, Shahmorady Z, Fouladi DF, et al. Visibility of different intraorbital foreign bodies using plain radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and cone-beam computed tomography: an in vitro study. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2017; 68:194–201. PMID:
26899378.
Article
15. Ginsburg MJ, Ellis GL, Flom LL. Detection of soft-tissue foreign bodies by plain radiography, xerography, computed tomography, and ultrasonography. Ann Emerg Med. 1990; 19:701–703. PMID:
2188542.
Article
16. Roobottom CA, Weston MJ. The detection of foreign bodies in soft tissue--comparison of conventional and digital radiography. Clin Radiol. 1994; 49:330–332. PMID:
8013198.
Article
17. Ganguly R, Ruprecht A, Vincent S, Hellstein J, Timmons S, Qian F. Accuracy of linear measurement in the Galileos cone beam computed tomography under simulated clinical conditions. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011; 40:299–305. PMID:
21697155.
Article
18. Lari SS, Shokri A, Hosseinipanah SM, Rostami S, Sabounchi SS. Comparative sensitivity assessment of cone beam computed tomography and digital radiography for detecting foreign bodies. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016; 17:224–229. PMID:
27207202.
19. Anderson MA, Newmeyer WL 3rd, Kilgore ES Jr. Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign bodies in the hand. Am J Surg. 1982; 144:63–67. PMID:
7091533.
Article
20. Krimmel M, Cornelius CP, Stojadinovic S, Hoffmann J, Reinert S. Wooden foreign bodies in facial injury: a radiological pitfall. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001; 30:445–447. PMID:
11720049.
Article
21. Specht CS, Varga JH, Jalali MM, Edelstein JP. Orbitocranial wooden foreign body diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging. Dry wood can be isodense with air and orbital fat by computed tomography. Surv Ophthalmol. 1992; 36:341–344. PMID:
1566235.
Article
22. Bushong SC. Radiologic science for technologists: physics, biology, and protection. St. Louis: Elsevier Mosby;2013.