Cancer Res Treat.  2018 Jan;50(1):204-211. 10.4143/crt.2017.091.

Validation of the Korean Version of the Quality of Life–Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS-K) Questionnaire in Lymphoma Survivors

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Clinical Research Design and Evaluation, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Cancer Education Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Health, Behavior and Society and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 4Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. kstwoh@skku.edu
  • 5Nursing Research & Education, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • 6Department of Health Sciences and Technology, SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The objective of this study was to validate the Korean version of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivors (QOL-CS-K) in a sample of lymphoma survivors.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We conducted a cross-sectional survey of lymphoma survivors who had survived for at least 24 months since diagnosis. Participants were recruited at the outpatient clinics and at a hospital event in a tertiary hospital in Seoul, Korea. Survivors were asked to complete the QOL-CS-K and the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) questionnaires. To determine test-retest reliability, a second questionnaire was sent to participants who completed the first questionnaire adequately. Exploratory factor analysis and Pearson's correlations were used for evaluating reliability and validity of the QOL-CS-K.
RESULTS
Among 257 survivors, 245 (95.3%) completed all questionnaires and had no missing data. The mean age of study participants was 52.2 years, 54.9% were men, and the mean time since diagnosis was 4.0±1.6 years. The Cronbach's α for the overall QOL-CS-K was 0.90, and the α coefficients for each subscale ranged from 0.73 to 0.83. The test and retest reliability was 0.88. Moderate correlations were found between comparable subscales of the QOL-CS-K and subscales of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (r=0.51-0.55) except for the spiritual well-being subscale of the QOL-CS-K, which did not correlate with any of the EORTC QLQ-C30 subscales (-0.08 to 0.16).
CONCLUSION
The QOL-CS-K is a reliable and valid scale for measuring the QOL in long-term lymphoma survivors.

Keyword

Survival; Quality of life; Lymphoma; Validation studies

MeSH Terms

Ambulatory Care Facilities
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diagnosis
Humans
Korea
Lymphoma*
Male
Quality of Life
Reproducibility of Results
Seoul
Survivors*
Tertiary Care Centers

Cited by  1 articles

Health-Related Quality of Life in Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Survivors: A Prospective Cohort Study
Danbee Kang, Juhee Cho, Im Ryung Kim, Mi Kyung Kim, Won Seog Kim, Seok Jin Kim
Cancer Res Treat. 2018;50(4):1051-1063.    doi: 10.4143/crt.2017.207.


Reference

References

1. Park HJ, Park EH, Jung KW, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Lee JY, et al. Statistics of hematologic malignancies in Korea: incidence, prevalence and survival rates from 1999 to 2008. Korean J Hematol. 2012; 47:28–38.
Article
2. Hewitt M, Greenfield S, Stovall E. From cancer patient to cancer survivor: lost in transition. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press;2005.
3. Arden-Close E, Pacey A, Eiser C. Health-related quality of life in survivors of lymphoma: a systematic review and methodological critique. Leuk Lymphoma. 2010; 51:628–40.
Article
4. Donnelly S. Quality-of-life assessment in advanced cancer. Curr Oncol Rep. 2000; 2:338–42.
Article
5. Cella D. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Anemia (FACT-An) Scale: a new tool for the assessment of outcomes in cancer anemia and fatigue. Semin Hematol. 1997; 34(3 Suppl 2):13–9.
6. Escobar A, Trujillo-Martin Mdel M, Rueda A, Perez-Ruiz E, Avis NE, Bilbao A. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of the Spanish version of the Quality of Life in Adult Cancer Survivors (QLACS) questionnaire: application in a sample of short-term survivors. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2015; 13:182.
Article
7. Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, Gandek B. SF-36 health survey: manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: The Health Institute, New England Medical Center;1993.
8. Smith SK, Mayer DK, Zimmerman S, Williams CS, Benecha H, Ganz PA, et al. Quality of life among long-term survivors of non-Hodgkin lymphoma: a follow-up study. J Clin Oncol. 2013; 31:272–9.
Article
9. Jeon M, Yoo IY, Kim S, Lee J. Post-traumatic growth in survivors of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Psychooncology. 2015; 24:871–7.
Article
10. Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 1995; 4:523–31.
Article
11. Fujimori M, Kobayakawa M, Nakaya N, Nagai K, Nishiwaki Y, Inagaki M, et al. Psychometric properties of the Japanese version of the Quality Of Life-Cancer Survivors Instrument. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15:1633–8.
Article
12. van Dis FW, Mols F, Vingerhoets AJ, Ferrell B, van de Poll-Franse LV. A validation study of the Dutch version of the Quality of Life-Cancer Survivor (QOL-CS) questionnaire in a group of prostate cancer survivors. Qual Life Res. 2006; 15:1607–12.
13. Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ, et al. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1993; 85:365–76.
Article
14. Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual. 3rd ed. Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer;2001.
15. Yun YH, Park YS, Lee ES, Bang SM, Heo DS, Park SY, et al. Validation of the Korean version of the EORTC QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res. 2004; 13:863–8.
Article
16. Lee JW, Jones PS, Mineyama Y, Zhang XE. Cultural differences in responses to a Likert scale. Res Nurs Health. 2002; 25:295–306.
Article
17. Costanzo ES, Ryff CD, Singer BH. Psychosocial adjustment among cancer survivors: findings from a national survey of health and well-being. Health Psychol. 2009; 28:147–56.
Article
18. Koenig HG. Research on religion, spirituality, and mental health: a review. Can J Psychiatry. 2009; 54:283–91.
Article
19. Gonzalez P, Castaneda SF, Dale J, Medeiros EA, Buelna C, Nunez A, et al. Spiritual well-being and depressive symptoms among cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2014; 22:2393–400.
Article
20. Borneman T, Ferrell B, Puchalski CM. Evaluation of the FICA tool for spiritual assessment. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010; 40:163–73.
Article
21. Watson M, Greer S, Young J, Inayat Q, Burgess C, Robertson B. Development of a questionnaire measure of adjustment to cancer: the MAC scale. Psychol Med. 1988; 18:203–9.
Article
22. Yong J, Kim J, Han SS, Puchalski CM. Development and validation of a scale assessing spiritual needs for Korean patients with cancer. J Palliat Care. 2008; 24:240–6.
Article
23. Allart-Vorelli P, Porro B, Baguet F, Michel A, Cousson-Gelie F. Haematological cancer and quality of life: a systematic literature review. Blood Cancer J. 2015; 5:e305.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr