Cancer Res Treat.  2015 Oct;47(4):600-606. 10.4143/crt.2014.162.

Oncologists' Experience with Patients with Second Primary Cancer and the Attitudes toward Second Primary Cancer Screening: A Nationwide Survey

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Family Medicine and Health Promotion Center, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 2Cancer Survivorship Clinic, Seoul National University Cancer Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Laboratory of Health Promotion and Health Behavior, Biomedical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
  • 4Department of Health, Behavior and Society and Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • 5Cancer Education Center, Samsung Comprehensive Cancer Center, SAHIST, Sunkyungkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 6Division of Cancer Policy and Management, National Cancer Control Institute, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea. jonghyock@gmail.com
  • 7College of Medicine/Graduate School of Health Science Business Convergence, Chungbuk National University, Cheongju, Korea.
  • 8Department of Urology, Chonbuk National University Medical School and Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Chonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital, Jeonju, Korea.
  • 9Department of Surgery, Postgraduate School of Medicine, Gyeongnam Regional Cancer Center, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju, Korea.
  • 10Department of Internal Medicine, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University College of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Screening for second primary cancer (SPC) is one of the key components to survivorship care. We aim to evaluate the oncologists' experience with SPCs and assess the current practice, perceived barriers, and recommendations related to SPC screening.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A nationwide survey was conducted with a representative sample of 496 Korean oncologists. A questionnaire based on the findings from our previous qualitative study was administered.
RESULTS
More than three-fourths of oncologists (76.3%), who participated in the study, had experience with SPC patients. Over half of them (51.9%) stated that it was an embarrassing experience. While the current management practice for SPC varies, most oncologists (80.2%) agreed on the necessity in proactively providing information on SPC screening. A short consultation time (52.3%), lack of guidelines and evidence on SPC screening (47.7%), and patients' lack of knowledge about SPCs (45.1%) or SPC screening (41.4%) were most frequently reported as barriers to providing appropriate care for managing SPC. Oncologists recommended the development of specific screening programs or guidelines in accordance to the type of primary cancer (65.9%), the development of an internal system for SPC screening within the hospital (59.7%) or systematic connection with the national cancer screening program (44.3%), and education of oncologists (41.4%) as well as patients (48.9%) regarding SPC screening.
CONCLUSION
Many oncologists reported the occurrence of SPC as an embarrassing experience. Given the variations in current practice and the lack of consensus, further studies are warranted to develop the optimal clinical strategy to provide SPC screening for cancer survivors.

Keyword

Oncologists; Second primary neoplasms; Early detection of cancer; Experience; Attitude

MeSH Terms

Consensus
Early Detection of Cancer
Education
Humans
Mass Screening*
Neoplasms, Second Primary*
Survival Rate
Survivors

Cited by  1 articles

Second Primary Cancer after Treating Gastrointestinal Cancer
Jeong Youp Park
Korean J Gastroenterol. 2019;74(4):193-196.    doi: 10.4166/kjg.2019.74.4.193.


Reference

References

1. Curtis RE, Freedman DM, Ron E, Ries LA, Hacker DG, Edwards BK, et al. New malignancies among cancer survivors: SEER cancer registries, 1973-2000. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute;2006.
2. Dong C, Hemminki K, et al. Second primary neoplasms in 633,964 cancer patients in Sweden, 1958-1996. Int J Cancer. 2001; 93:155–61.
Article
3. Horner MJ, Ries LA, Krapcho M, Neyman N, Aminou R, Howlader N, et al. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2006. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute;2009.
4. Jemal A, Clegg LX, Ward E, Ries LA, Wu X, Jamison PM, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2001, with a special feature regarding survival. Cancer. 2004; 101:3–27.
Article
5. Weir HK, Thun MJ, Hankey BF, Ries LA, Howe HL, Wingo PA, et al. Annual report to the nation on the status of cancer, 1975-2000, featuring the uses of surveillance data for cancer prevention and control. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2003; 95:1276–99.
Article
6. Yabroff KR, Lawrence WF, Clauser S, Davis WW, Brown ML. Burden of illness in cancer survivors: findings from a population-based national sample. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004; 96:1322–30.
Article
7. Jung KW, Park S, Kong HJ, Won YJ, Boo YK, Shin HR, et al. Cancer statistics in Korea: incidence, mortality and survival in 2006-2007. J Korean Med Sci. 2010; 25:1113–21.
Article
8. Schaapveld M, Visser O, Louwman MJ, de Vries EG, Willemse PH, Otter R, et al. Risk of new primary nonbreast cancers after breast cancer treatment: a Dutch population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2008; 26:1239–46.
Article
9. Mandel JS, Bond JH, Church TR, Snover DC, Bradley GM, Schuman LM, et al. Reducing mortality from colorectal cancer by screening for fecal occult blood. Minnesota Colon Cancer Control Study. N Engl J Med. 1993; 328:1365–71.
10. Cheung WY, Neville BA, Cameron DB, Cook EF, Earle CC. Comparisons of patient and physician expectations for cancer survivorship care. J Clin Oncol. 2009; 27:2489–95.
Article
11. Buchler T, Kubankova P, Boublikova L, Donatova Z, Foldyna M, Kanakova J, et al. Detection of second malignancies during long-term follow-up of testicular cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011; 117:4212–8.
Article
12. Cho J, Guallar E, Hsu YJ, Shin DW, Lee WC. A comparison of cancer screening practices in cancer survivors and in the general population: the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (KNHANES) 2001-2007. Cancer Causes Control. 2010; 21:2203–12.
Article
13. Suh B, Shin DW, Kim SY, Park JH, Chang WY, Lim SP, et al. Mode of primary cancer detection as an indicator of screening practice for second primary cancer in cancer survivors: a nationwide survey in Korea. BMC Cancer. 2012; 12:557.
Article
14. Shin DW, Cho J, Kim YW, Oh JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, et al. Efficacy of an educational material on second primary cancer screening practice for cancer survivors: a randomized controlled trial. PLoS One. 2012; 7:e33238.
Article
15. Earle CC, Neville BA. Under use of necessary care among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2004; 101:1712–9.
Article
16. Mayer DK, Terrin NC, Menon U, Kreps GL, McCance K, Parsons SK, et al. Screening practices in cancer survivors. J Cancer Surviv. 2007; 1:17–26.
Article
17. Earle CC, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Weeks JC. Quality of non-breast cancer health maintenance among elderly breast cancer survivors. J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:1447–51.
Article
18. Trask PC, Rabin C, Rogers ML, Whiteley J, Nash J, Frierson G, et al. Cancer screening practices among cancer survivors. Am J Prev Med. 2005; 28:351–6.
Article
19. Shin DW, Baik YJ, Kim YW, Oh JH, Chung KW, Kim SW, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, and practice on second primary cancer screening among cancer survivors: a qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2011; 85:74–8.
Article
20. Shin DW, Kim YW, Oh JH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Lee WY, et al. Knowledge, attitudes, risk perception, and cancer screening behaviors among cancer survivors. Cancer. 2011; 117:3850–9.
Article
21. Shin DW, Kim Y, Baek YJ, Mo HN, Choi JY, Cho J. Oncologists experience with second primary cancer screening: current practices and barriers and potential solutions. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012; 13:671–6.
Article
22. Shin DW, Park JH, Shim EJ, Hahm MI, Park JH, Park EC. Predictors and outcomes of feeling of insufficient consultation time in cancer care in Korea: results of a nationwide multicenter survey. Support Care Cancer. 2012; 20:1965–73.
Article
23. Howie JG, Porter AM, Heaney DJ, Hopton JL. Long to short consultation ratio: a proxy measure of quality of care for general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1991; 41:48–54.
24. Status of the medical oncology workforce. The American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol. 1996; 14:2612–21.
25. Cegala DJ, McClure L, Marinelli TM, Post DM. The effects of communication skills training on patients' participation during medical interviews. Patient Educ Couns. 2000; 41:209–22.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CRT
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr