Intest Res.  2017 Oct;15(4):518-523. 10.5217/ir.2017.15.4.518.

Predictive factors for malignancy in undiagnosed isolated small bowel strictures

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.
  • 2Department of GI Surgery, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India. peush_sahni@hotmail.com
  • 3Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS
Patients with small bowel strictures have varied etiologies, including malignancy. Little data are available on the demographic profiles and etiologies of small bowel strictures in patients who undergo surgery because of intestinal obstruction but do not have a definitive pre-operative diagnosis.
METHODS
Retrospective data were analyzed for all patients operated between January 2000 and October 2014 for small bowel strictures without mass lesions and a definite diagnosis after imaging and endoscopic examinations. Demographic parameters, imaging, endoscopic, and histological data were extracted from the medical records. Univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify factors that could differentiate between intestinal tuberculosis (ITB) and Crohn's disease (CD) and between malignant and benign strictures.
RESULTS
Of the 7,425 reviewed medical records, 89 met the inclusion criteria. The most common site of strictures was the proximal small intestine (41.5%). The most common histological diagnoses in patients with small bowel strictures were ITB (26.9%), CD (23.5%), non-specific strictures (20.2%), malignancy (15.5%), ischemia (10.1%), and other complications (3.4%). Patients with malignant strictures were older than patients with benign etiologies (47.6±15.9 years vs. 37.4±16.4 years, P=0.03) and age >50 years had a specificity for malignant etiology of 80%. Only 7.1% of the patients with malignant strictures had more than 1 stricture and 64% had proximally located strictures. Diarrhea was the only factor that predicted the diagnosis of CD 6.5 (95% confidence interval, 1.10-38.25; P=0.038) compared with the diagnosis of ITB.
CONCLUSIONS
Malignancy was the cause of small bowel strictures in approximately 16% patients, especially among older patients with a single stricture in the proximal location. Empirical therapy should be avoided and the threshold for surgical resection is low in these patients.

Keyword

Small intestinal stricture; Crohn disease; Tuberculosis; Neoplasms

MeSH Terms

Constriction, Pathologic*
Crohn Disease
Diagnosis
Diarrhea
Humans
Intestinal Obstruction
Intestine, Small
Ischemia
Medical Records
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Sensitivity and Specificity
Tuberculosis

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Pie chart showing the etiology of small bowel strictures based on the histology of the resected specimens. GIST, gastrointestinal stromal tumor.

  • Fig. 2 Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for age as a predictor of malignant strictures. Area under the ROC curve, 0.70 (0.55–0.85); sensitivity, 57%, and specificity, 80%.


Reference

1. Kelly ME, McMahon LE, Jaroszewski DE, Yousfi MM, De Petris G, Swain JM. Small-bowel diaphragm disease: seven surgical cases. Arch Surg. 2005; 140:1162–1166. PMID: 16365236.
2. Wang ML, Miao F, Tang YH, Zhao XS, Zhong J, Yuan F. Special diaphragm-like strictures of small bowel unrelated to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. World J Gastroenterol. 2011; 17:3596–3604. PMID: 21987606.
Article
3. Patel S, Gurjar SV. Small intestinal strictures as a complication of mesenteric vessel thrombosis: two case reports. J Med Case Rep. 2009; 3:8623.
Article
4. Honzawa Y, Kondo M, Hayakumo T, Matsuura M, Nakase H. Successful endoscopic dilation treatment of small intestinal stricture occurring during chemotherapy for malignant lymphoma. Case Rep Gastroenterol. 2010; 4:323–329. PMID: 21060694.
Article
5. Ahuja V, Tandon RK. Inflammatory bowel disease in the Asia-Pacific area: a comparison with developed countries and regional differences. J Dig Dis. 2010; 11:134–147. PMID: 20579217.
Article
6. Ahuja V, Tandon RK. Inflammatory bowel disease: the Indian augury. Indian J Gastroenterol. 2012; 31:294–296. PMID: 23150035.
Article
7. Makharia GK, Srivastava S, Das P, et al. Clinical, endoscopic, and histological differentiations between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010; 105:642–651. PMID: 20087333.
Article
8. Zhou ZY, Luo HS. Differential diagnosis between Crohn’s disease and intestinal tuberculosis in China. Int J Clin Pract. 2006; 60:212–214. PMID: 16451295.
Article
Full Text Links
  • IR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr