Obstet Gynecol Sci.  2017 Sep;60(5):421-426. 10.5468/ogs.2017.60.5.421.

Comparison of perinatal outcomes in late preterm birth between singleton and twin pregnancies

• Yoo EH
• Chun D
• Kim MJ
• Cha HH
• Seong WJ

• KMID: 2393840
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5468/ogs.2017.60.5.421

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
To determine whether late preterm twin neonates have a more favorable perinatal outcome than singleton late preterm neonates.
METHODS
We studied 401 late preterm births between 34+0 and 36+6 weeks of gestation, from January 2011 to December 2014 in our institution. We compared the maternal and neonatal characteristics and perinatal outcomes between singleton and twin pregnancies. Perinatal outcomes included Apgar score, admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) or special care nursery, duration of NICU stay, and the rate of composite morbidity (antibiotic use, hypoglycemia, hypocalcemia, hyperbilirubinemia requiring phototherapy, respiratory support, and respiratory distress syndrome).
RESULTS
A total of 289 neonates were in the singleton group and 112 in the twin group. The twin group showed smaller mean birth weight despite of longer gestational age at delivery. In addition, there were significant differences in the indication of delivery and cesarean section rate between the 2 groups. Overall, the risk of composite morbidity was similar between 2 groups (odds ratio, 1.4; 95% confidence interval, 0.8 to 2.4).
CONCLUSION
Our findings suggest that late preterm twins do not show a more favorable outcome than singleton late preterm births.

Keyword

Pregnancy, Twin; Perinatal care; Cesarean section

MeSH Terms

Apgar Score
Birth Weight
Cesarean Section
Female
Gestational Age
Humans
Hyperbilirubinemia
Hypocalcemia
Hypoglycemia
Infant, Newborn
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Nurseries
Perinatal Care
Phototherapy
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Twin*
Premature Birth*
Twins*

Reference

1. Korean Statistical Information Service. Future population estimation [Internet]. Daejeon (KR): Statistics Korea;2015. 2017.08.11.Available from: http://kosis.kr/ups/ups_01List.jsp?pubcode=PJ.

2. Martin JA, Kung HC, Mathews TJ, Hoyert DL, Strobino DM, Guyer B, et al. Annual summary of vital statistics: 2006. Pediatrics. 2008; 121:788–801. PMID: 18381544.

3. Loftin RW, Habli M, Snyder CC, Cormier CM, Lewis DF, Defranco EA. Late preterm birth. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2010; 3:10–19. PMID: 20508778.

4. Newman RB, Unal ER. Multiple gestations: timing of indicated late preterm and early-term births in uncomplicated dichorionic, monochorionic, and monoamniotic twins. Semin Perinatol. 2011; 35:277–285. PMID: 21962627.

5. Tomashek KM, Shapiro-Mendoza CK, Davidoff MJ, Petrini JR. Differences in mortality between late preterm and term singleton infants in the United States, 1995–2002. J Pediatr. 2007; 151:450–456.e1. PMID: 17961684.

6. Brown HK, Speechley KN, Macnab J, Natale R, Campbell MK. Neonatal morbidity associated with late preterm and early term birth: the roles of gestational age and biological determinants of preterm birth. Int J Epidemiol. 2014; 43:802–814. PMID: 24374829.

7. Ribicic R, Kranjcec I, Borosak J, Tumbri J, Mihovilovic Prajz L, Ribicic T. Perinatal outcome of singleton versus twin late preterm infants: do twins mature faster than singletons? J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2016; 29:1520–1524. PMID: 26103779.

8. Spong CY, Mercer BM, D'alton M, Kilpatrick S, Blackwell S, Saade G. Timing of indicated late preterm and early-term birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 118:323–333. PMID: 21775849.

9. Jakiel G, Wilińska M, Bińkowska M, Kowal A, Rumowska S, Ciebiera M. Late preterm infants - impact of perinatal factors on neonatal results. A clinical study. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2015; 22:536–541. PMID: 26403130.

10. Tsai ML, Lien R, Chiang MC, Hsu JF, Fu RH, Chu SM, et al. Prevalence and morbidity of late preterm infants: current status in a medical center of Northern Taiwan. Pediatr Neonatol. 2012; 53:171–177. PMID: 22770105.

11. Davidoff MJ, Dias T, Damus K, Russell R, Bettegowda VR, Dolan S, et al. Changes in the gestational age distribution among U.S. singleton births: impact on rates of late preterm birth, 1992 to 2002. Semin Perinatol. 2006; 30:8–15. PMID: 16549207.

12. Büscher U, Horstkamp B, Wessel J, Chen FC, Dudenhausen JW. Frequency and significance of preterm delivery in twin pregnancies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2000; 69:1–7. PMID: 10760526.

13. Elliott JP, Istwan NB, Collins A, Rhea D, Stanziano G. Indicated and non-indicated preterm delivery in twin gestations: impact on neonatal outcome and cost. J Perinatol. 2005; 25:4–7. PMID: 15496871.

14. Christopher D, Robinson BK, Peaceman AM. An evidence-based approach to determining route of delivery for twin gestations. Rev Obstet Gynecol. 2011; 4:109–116. PMID: 22229063.

15. Friedman SA, Schiff E, Kao L, Kuint J, Sibai BM. Do twins mature earlier than singletons? Results from a matched cohort study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1997; 176:1193–1196. discusstion 6-9. PMID: 9215173.

16. Shinwell ES, Haklai T, Eventov-Friedman S. Outcomes of multiplets. Neonatology. 2009; 95:6–14. PMID: 18832859.

17. Simchen MJ, Okrent Smolar AL, Dulitzky M, Sivan E, Morag I. Neonatal morbidities and need for intervention in twins and singletons born at 34–35 weeks of gestation. J Perinat Med. 2016; 44:887–892. PMID: 26677882.

18. Engle WA, Kominiarek MA. Late preterm infants, early term infants, and timing of elective deliveries. Clin Perinatol. 2008; 35:325–341. viPMID: 18456072.

19. Kilpatrick SJ, Jackson R, Croughan-Minihane MS. Perinatal mortality in twins and singletons matched for gestational age at delivery at > or = 30 weeks. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996; 174:66–71. PMID: 8572036.

20. Lee HJ, Kim SH, Chang KH, Sung JH, Choi SJ, Oh SY, et al. Gestational age at delivery and neonatal outcome in uncomplicated twin pregnancies: what is the optimal gestational age for delivery according to chorionicity? Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2016; 59:9–16. PMID: 26866030.

21. Lee JH, Jun JK. Management of twin delivery. Korean J Perinatol. 2007; 18:95–100.

22. Gielen M, Lindsey PJ, Derom C, Loos RJ, Souren NY, Paulussen AD, et al. Twin-specific intrauterine ‘growth’ charts based on cross-sectional birthweight data. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2008; 11:224–235. PMID: 18361725.

23. Odibo AO, Cahill AG, Goetzinger KR, Harper LM, Tuuli MG, Macones GA. Customized growth charts for twin gestations to optimize identification of small-for-gestational age fetuses at risk of intrauterine fetal death. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2013; 41:637–642. PMID: 23334992.

24. Ballabh P, Kumari J, AlKouatly HB, Yih M, Arevalo R, Rosenwaks Z, et al. Neonatal outcome of triplet versus twin and singleton pregnancies: a matched case control study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2003; 107:28–36. PMID: 12593890.

25. Feldman K, Woolcott C, O'Connell C, Jangaard K. Neonatal outcomes in spontaneous versus obstetrically indicated late preterm births in a nova scotia population. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2012; 34:1158–1166. PMID: 23231798.

26. Burgess JL, Unal ER, Nietert PJ, Newman RB. Risk of late preterm stillbirth and neonatal morbidity for monochorionic and dichorionic twins. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 210:578. PMID: 24607757.

27. Jung YJ, Kwon JY, Cho HY, Park YW, Kim YH. Comparison of the performance of screening test for gestational diabetes in singleton versus twin pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol Sci. 2015; 58:439–445. PMID: 26623406.