Korean J Health Promot.  2017 Sep;17(3):161-167. 10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.3.161.

Perception about Age at the Start and End of Periodic Health Examinations: a Survey-based Study on University Hospital in Korea

• Shin S
• Song YM
• Ko H
• Choi YH
• Lee WY
• Chung SM
• Park S
• Kim I
• Shin J

• KMID: 2391307
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.15384/kjhp.2017.17.3.161

Abstract

BACKGROUND
Based on scientific evidence, the Korean National Health Examination recommends age 40 as an appropriate time for screening. However, awareness of the health examination itself or of the appropriate age for screening has not been discussed extensively with examinees. This study aims to evaluate the perception about age at the start and end of periodic health examinations (PHE).
METHODS
A self-administered survey was completed by 887 subjects who visited either the health promotion center or the outpatient clinic at a university hospital in Korea between February 15 and May 18, 2016. Participants were divided into two groups: 587 were periodic health examinees, and 300 were visitors to the family medicine clinic. Their awareness of PHE was compared using the Chi-square test and multiple logistic regression.
RESULTS
Both groups had similar (P>0.05) perceptions regarding the awareness, knowledge and usefulness of the PHE. Both groups preferred to continue taking a PHE with no upper limit on the age when it could be taken. This tendency was more prominent among subjects with higher levels of education and household income. In both groups with individuals under age 50 said that the appropriate age to begin screening is 40 or younger.
CONCLUSIONS
The perception regarding the ages at which to start and end the PHE was confirmed according to the subject of visit; a wider range of appropriate ages was preferred than is included in the current recommendations.

Keyword

Health service; Age factors; Socioeconomic factors

MeSH Terms

Age Factors
Ambulatory Care Facilities
Education
Family Characteristics
Health Promotion
Health Services
Humans
Korea*
Logistic Models
Mass Screening
Socioeconomic Factors

Reference

1.Larson JS. The World Health Organization's definition of health: social versus spiritual health. Soc Indic Res. 1996. 38(2):181–92.

2.Boulware LE., Marinopoulos S., Phillips KA., Hwang CW., Maynor K., Merenstein D, et al. Systematic review: the value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med. 2007. 146(4):289–300.

3.Maciosek MV., Coffield AB., Edwards NM., Flottemesch TJ., Goodman MJ., Solberg LI. Priorities among effective clinical preventive services: results of a systematic review and analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2006. 31(1):52–61.

4.The Korean Academy of Family Medicine. Life-Long Health Care of Koreans. 3rd ed.Seoul: Kukjin Paper & Design;2009. p. 43–180.

5.Kang S., You CH., Kwon YD. The determinants of the use of opportunistic screening programs in Korea. J Prev Med Public Health. 2009. 42(3):177–82.

6.Cohen JT., Neumann PJ., Weinstein MC. Does preventive care save money? Health economics and the presidential candidates. N Engl J Med. 2008. 358(7):661–3.

7.Burton LC., Steinwachs DM., German PS., Shapiro S., Brant LJ., Richards TM, et al. Preventive services for the elderly: would coverage affect utilization and costs under medicare? Am J Public Health. 1995. 85(3):387–91.

8.Shin YS., Park CY., Jung SH., Jung HY., Kang HY. Comparison of customer satisfaction with health examination programs provided by the Korea National Health Insurance and private healthcare organizations in Korea. J Korean Soc Qual Health Care. 2006. 12(1):40–51.

9.Seong SC. 2015 National Health Screening Statistical Yearbook. Seoul: National Health Inssurance Service;2016. p. 42–64.

10.Finkelstein MM. Preventive screening. What factors influence testing? Can Fam Physician. 2002. 48(9):1494–501.

11.Lee SA., Choi KS., Hwang SY., Lee JY., Park EC., Lee KJ, et al. The effect of socioeconomic factors on health screening on Korea: the 2001 Korean National Examination Health and Nutrition Surveys (KNEHANS). J Korean Assoc Cancer Prev. 2004. 9(3):188–98.

12.Chun EJ., Jang SN., Cho SI., Cho Y., Moon OR. Disparities in participation in health examination by socioeconomic position among adult Seoul residents. J Prev Med Public Health. 2007. 40(5):345–50.

13.Moyer VA. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for cervical cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2012. 156(12):880–91. W312.

14.Lee WC., Lee SY. National Health screening program of Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2010. 53(5):363–70.

15.Kim RB., Park KS., Hong DY., Lee CH., Kim JR. Factors associated with cancer screening intention in eligible persons for national cancer screening program. J Prev Med Public Health. 2010. 43(1):62–72.

16.Cho B., Lee CM. Current situation of national health screening systems in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2011. 54(7):666–9.

17.Lee EH., Park B., Kim NS., Seo HJ., Ko KL., Min JW, et al. The Korean guideline for breast cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015. 58(5):408–19.

18.Park HA., Nam SY., Lee SK., Kim SG., Shim KN., Park SM, et al. The Korean guideline for gastric cancer screening. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015. 58(5):373–84.

19.Lee WC., Kim Y. Background and significance of Korean national cancer screening guideline revision. J Korean Med Assoc. 2015. 58(4):274–6.

20.Boer R., de Koning H., Threlfall A., Warmerdam P., Street A., Friedman E, et al. Cost effectiveness of shortening screening interval or extending age range of NHS breast screening programme: computer simulation study. BMJ. 1998. 317(7155):376–9.

21.Moon KS., Kim YK., Chang HJ. Determinants of the use and type of comprehensive medical examination services. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2016. 10(2):83–97.