Neurointervention.  2017 Sep;12(2):100-109. 10.5469/neuroint.2017.12.2.100.

Effectiveness of Preradiosurgical Embolization with NBCA for Arteriovenous Malformations - Retrospective Outcome Analysis in a Japanese Registry of 73 Patients (J-REAL study)

Affiliations
  • 1Neuroendovascular Therapy Center, Aichi Medical University, Nagakute, Japan. miyachi.shigeru.752@mail.aichi-med-u.ac.jp
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery and Endovascular Neurosurgery, Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan.
  • 3Department of Neurosurgery, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
  • 4Department of Neurosurgery, Tokai University Hospital, Isehara, Japan.
  • 5Department of Neuroendovascular Therapy, Kohnan Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
  • 6Department of Neurosurgery, Showa University Fujigaoka Hospital, Yokohama, Japan.
  • 7Department of Neurosurgery, University of Tsukuba Hospital, Tsukuba, Japan.
  • 8Department of Radiology, Oita University Hospital, Oita, Japan.

Abstract

PURPOSE
Recent reports have posed doubts about the effect of preradiosurgical embolization in brain arteriovenous malformation (AVM) because it makes the planning of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) difficult and has the risk of recanalization out of the target. We investigated whether the performance and quality of embolization may influence the success of SRS based on a retrospective case cohort study.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Seventy-three patients who underwent embolization followed by SRS between 2003 and 2012 in eight institutes with neurointerventionists were considered. They were divided into the following two groups at 3 years of follow up after the final SRS: "successful occlusion group" (S group), with radiologically complete occlusion of AVM; and "non-successful occlusion group" (N group) with persistent remnant nidus or abnormal vascular networks. Patient background, AVM profile, embolization performance grade and complications were compared in each group. The quality of embolization was evaluated with the new grading system: embolization performance grade (E grade), specializing the achievement of nidus embolization. E grade A was defined as sufficient nidus embolization with more than half of the total number of feeders achieving nidus penetration. E grade B was defined as less than half achievement of nidus embolization, and E grade C was defines as failure to perform nidus embolization.
RESULTS
Forty-three patients were included in the S group, and 29 patients were included in the N group. The size and Spetzler-Martin grade of AVM and the rate of diffuse type was higher in the N group without statistical significance. The embolization performance level according to E grade indicated a significantly higher rate of successful embolization with more than 50% of nidus penetration in the S group (P<0.001). This difference was also confirmed in the subanalysis for limited cases, excluding smaller AVMs with complete occlusion with SRS alone (P=0.001).
CONCLUSION
The cause of the unsuccessful result of post-embolization SRS might be the large, diffuse angioarchitecture, but proper embolization with a high rate of nidus penetration to avoid recanalization is more important. Effective embolization is essential to contribute to and promote the effect of radiosurgery.

Keyword

Arteriovenous malformation; Nidus; Embolization; Radiosurgery; Quality

MeSH Terms

Academies and Institutes
Arteriovenous Malformations*
Asian Continental Ancestry Group*
Brain
Cohort Studies
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Radiosurgery
Retrospective Studies*

Reference

1. Gobin YP, Laurent A, Merienne L, Schlienger M, Aymard A, Houdart E, et al. Treatment of brain arteriovenous malformations by embolization and radiosurgery. J Neurosurg. 1996; 85:19–28. PMID: 8683274.
Article
2. Miyachi S, Negoro M, Okamoto T, Kobayashi T, Tanaka T, Kida Y, et al. Embolisation of cerebral arteriovenous malformations to assure successful subsequent radiosurgery. J Clin Neurosci. 2000; (Suppl 1):82–85. PMID: 11013105.
Article
3. Ellis JA, Lavine SD. Role of embolization for cerebral arteriovenous malformations. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2014; 10:234–239. PMID: 25624978.
Article
4. Schwyzer L, Yen CP, Evans A, Zavoian S, Steiner L. Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for partially embolized arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2012; 71:1139–1147. PMID: 22986603.
Article
5. Blackburn SL, Ashley WW Jr, Rich KM, Simpson JR, Drzymala RE, Ray WZ, et al. Combined endovascular embolization and stereotactic radiosurgery in the treatment of large arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2011; 114:1758–1767. PMID: 21332288.
Article
6. Pollock BE, Flickinger JC, Lunsford LD, Maitz A, Kondziolka D. Factors associated with successful arteriovenous malformation radiosurgery. Neurosurgery. 1998; 42:1239–1244. PMID: 9632181.
Article
7. Andrade-Souza YM, Ramani M, Scora D, Tsao MN, terBrugge K, Schwartz ML. Embolization before radiosurgery reduces the obliteration rate of arteriovenous malformations. Neurosurgery. 2007; 60:443–451. PMID: 17327788.
Article
8. Ding D, Yen CP, Xu Z, Starke RM, Sheehan JP. Radiosurgery for primary motor and sensory cortex arteriovenous malformations: outcomes and the effect of eloquent location. Neurosurgery. 2013; 73:816–824. PMID: 23867301.
9. Starke RM, Kano H, Ding D, Lee JY, Mathieu D, Whitesell J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for cerebral arteriovenous malformations: evaluation of long-term outcomes in a multicenter cohort. J Neurosurg. 2017; 126:36–44. PMID: 26943847.
Article
10. Ivanov AA, Alaraj A, Charbel FT, Aletich V, Amin-Hanjani S. Recurrence of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations Following Resection in Adults: Does Preoperative Embolization Increase the Risk? Neurosurgery. 2016; 78:562–571. PMID: 26702837.
11. Hodgson TJ, Kemeny AA, Gholkar A, Deasy N. Embolization of residual fistula following stereotactic radiosurgery in cerebral arteriovenous malformations. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009; 30:109–110. PMID: 18687747.
Article
12. Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Park KJ, Iyer A, Yang HC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery after embolization for arteriovenous malformations. Prog Neurol Surg. 2013; 27:89–96. PMID: 23258513.
Article
13. Ding D, Starke RM, Kano H, Lee JY, Mathieu D, Pierce J, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for Spetzler-Martin Grade III arteriovenous malformations: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 2017; 126:859–871. PMID: 27081906.
Article
14. Xu F, Zhong J, Ray A, Manjila S, Bambakidis NC. Stereotactic radiosurgery with and without embolization for intracranial arteriovenous malformations: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurosurg Focus. 2014; 37(3):E16. DOI: 10.3171/2014.6.FOCUS14178.
Article
15. Marks MP, Marcellus ML, Santarelli J, Dodd RL, Do HM, Chang SD, et al. Embolization Followed by Radiosurgery for the Treatment of Brain Arteriovenous Malformations (AVMs). World Neurosurg. 2017; 99:471–476. PMID: 28017742.
Article
16. Izawa M, Chemov M, Hayashi M, Iseki H, Hori T, Takakura K. Combined management of intracranial arteriovenous malformations with embolization and gamma knife radiosurgery: comparative evaluation of the long-term results. Surg Neurol. 2009; 71:43–52. PMID: 18291487.
Article
17. Kondo R, Matsumoto Y, Endo H, Miyachi S, Ezura M, Sakai N. Endovascular Embolization of Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformations: Results of the Japanese Registry of Neuroendovascular Therapy (JR-NET) 1 and 2. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2014; 54(Suppl 2):54–62.
Article
18. Spetzler RF, Martin NA. A proposed grading system for arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 1986; 65:476–483. PMID: 3760956.
Article
19. Wegner RE, Oysul K, Pollock BE, Sirin S, Kondziolka D, Niranjan A, et al. A modified radiosurgery-based arteriovenous malformation grading scale and its correlation with outcomes. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011; 79:1147–1150. PMID: 20605347.
Article
20. Kano H, Kondziolka D, Flickinger JC, Park KJ, Iyer A, Yang HC, et al. Stereotactic radiosurgery for arteriovenous malformations after embolization: a case-control study. J Neurosurg. 2012; 117:265–275. PMID: 22631689.
Article
21. Cohen-Inbar O, Starke RM, Paisan G, Kano H, Huang PP, Rodriguez-Mercado R, et al. Early versus late arteriovenous malformation responders after stereotactic radiosurgery: an international multicenter study. J Neurosurg. 2017; 127:503–511. PMID: 27662534.
Article
22. Knippen S, Putz F, Semrau S, Lambrecht U, Knippen A, Buchfelder M, et al. Predictors for occlusion of cerebral AVMs following radiation therapy: Radiation dose and prior embolization, but not Spetzler-Martin grade. Strahlenther Onkol. 2017; 193:185–191. PMID: 27757503.
23. Oermann EK, Ding D, Yen CP, Starke RM, Bederson JB, Kondziolka D, et al. Effect of Prior Embolization on Cerebral Arteriovenous Malformation Radiosurgery Outcomes: A Case-Control Study. Neurosurgery. 2015; 77:406–417. PMID: 25875580.
24. Yashar P, Amar AP, Giannotta SL, Yu C, Pagnini PG, Liu CY, Apuzzo ML. Cerebral arteriovenous malformations: issues of the interplay between stereotactic radiosurgery and endovascular surgical therapy. World Neurosurg. 2011; 75:638–647. PMID: 21704930.
Article
25. Seymour ZA, Sneed PK, Gupta N, Lawton MT, Molinaro AM, Young W, et al. Volume-staged radiosurgery for large arteriovenous malformations: an evolving paradigm. J Neurosurg. 2016; 124:163–174. PMID: 26140495.
Article
26. Firlik AD, Levy EI, Kondziolka D, Yonas H. Staged volume radiosurgery followed by microsurgical resection: a novel treatment for giant cerebral arteriovenous malformations: technical case report. Neurosurgery. 1998; 43:1223–1228. PMID: 9802869.
Article
27. Back AG, Vollmer D, Zeck O, Shkedy C, Shedden PM. Retrospective analysis of unstaged and staged Gamma Knife surgery with and without preceding embolization for the treatment of arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg. 2008; 109(Suppl):57–64.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr