Ann Rehabil Med.  2017 Jun;41(3):362-375. 10.5535/arm.2017.41.3.362.

The Korean Version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP): A Reliability and Validity Study

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. drpjh@catholic.ac.kr
  • 2HU&U Hospital, Bucheon, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To develop the Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients (K-CASP) and to evaluate the test reliability and validity of the K-CASP in stroke patients.
METHODS
The original CASP was translated into Korean, back-translated into English, then reviewed and compared with the original version. Thirty-three stroke patients were assessed independently by two examiners using the K-CASP twice, with a one-day interval, for a total of four test results. To evaluate the reliability of the K-CASP, intra-class correlation coefficients were used. Pearson correlations were calculated and simple regression analyses performed with the Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (K-MMSE) and the aphasia quotient (AQ) to assess the validity.
RESULTS
The mean score was 24.42±9.47 (total score 36) for the K-CASP and 21.50±7.01 (total score 30) for the K-MMSE. The inter-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.992 on the first day and 0.995 on the second day. The intra-rater correlation coefficients of the K-CASP were 0.997 for examiner 1 and 0.996 for examiner 2. In the Pearson correlation analysis, the K-CASP score significantly correlated with the K-MMSE score (r=0.825, p<0.001). The coefficients of determination (r²) of the AQ were 0.586 for the K-MMSE and 0.513 for the K-CASP in the simple regression analysis.
CONCLUSION
The K-CASP is a reliable and valid instrument for cognitive dysfunction screening in post-stroke patients. It is more applicable than other cognitive assessment tools in stroke patients with aphasia.

Keyword

Stroke; Cognition disorders; Neuropsychological tests; Validation studies

MeSH Terms

Aphasia
Cognition Disorders
Humans
Mass Screening
Neuropsychological Tests
Reproducibility of Results*
Stroke*

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Scatter plot of reliability with the simple regression adjusted to fit the data. All scores from the K-CASP are expressed in logits. (A) Inter-rater reliability assessed at the first day, (B) inter-rater reliability assessed at the second day, (C) intra-rater reliability assessed by examiner 1, (D) intra-rater reliability assessed by examiner 2. K-CASP, Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale; ICC, intra-class correlation coefficient.

  • Fig. 2 Correlation between the K-MMSE score and the mean K-CASP score. K-MMSE, Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination; K-CASP, Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale; r, Pearson correlation coefficient.

  • Fig. 3 Correlations of the AQ, K-MMSE, and K-CASP. Simple regression analysis was performed to determine the relations. K-CASP, Korean version of the Cognitive Assessment Scale; K-MMSE, Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination; AQ, quotient score for the Korean version-Western Aphasia Battery published by the Paradise Welfare Foundation. *p<0.001.


Reference

1. Pendlebury ST, Rothwell PM. Prevalence, incidence, and factors associated with pre-stroke and post-stroke dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8:1006–1018. PMID: 19782001.
Article
2. Tatemichi TK, Paik M, Bagiella E, Desmond DW, Pirro M, Hanzawa LK. Dementia after stroke is a predictor of long-term survival. Stroke. 1994; 25:1915–1919. PMID: 8091433.
Article
3. Pasquini M, Leys D, Rousseaux M, Pasquier F, Henon H. Influence of cognitive impairment on the institutionalisation rate 3 years after a stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 78:56–59. PMID: 16952914.
Article
4. Lees R, Selvarajah J, Fenton C, Pendlebury ST, Langhorne P, Stott DJ, et al. Test accuracy of cognitive screening tests for diagnosis of dementia and multidomain cognitive impairment in stroke. Stroke. 2014; 45:3008–3018. PMID: 25190446.
Article
5. Kwon YC, Park JH. Korean version of Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE-K). Part I: Development of the test for the elderly. J Korean Neuropsychiatr Assoc. 1989; 28:125–135.
6. Pendlebury ST, Cuthbertson FC, Welch SJ, Mehta Z, Rothwell PM. Underestimation of cognitive impairment by Mini-Mental State Examination versus the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in patients with transient ischemic attack and stroke: a population-based study. Stroke. 2010; 41:1290–1293. PMID: 20378863.
7. Brookes RL, Hannesdottir K, Lawrence R, Morris RG, Markus HS. Brief Memory and Executive Test: evaluation of a new screening test for cognitive impairment due to small vessel disease. Age Ageing. 2012; 41:212–218. PMID: 22267862.
Article
8. Barnay JL, Wauquiez G, Bonnin-Koang HY, Anquetil C, Perennou D, Piscicelli C, et al. Feasibility of the cognitive assessment scale for stroke patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in aphasic left hemispheric stroke patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2014; 57:422–435. PMID: 24953703.
Article
9. Demeyere N, Riddoch MJ, Slavkova ED, Jones K, Reckless I, Mathieson P, et al. Domain-specific versus generalized cognitive screening in acute stroke. J Neurol. 2016; 263:306–315. PMID: 26588918.
Article
10. Benaim C, Barnay JL, Wauquiez G, Bonnin-Koang HY, Anquetil C, Perennou D, et al. The Cognitive Assessment scale for Stroke Patients (CASP) vs. MMSE and MoCA in non-aphasic hemispheric stroke patients. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2015; 58:78–85. PMID: 25766087.
Article
11. Snodgrass JG, Vanderwart M. A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. J Exp Psychol Hum Learn. 1980; 6:174–215. PMID: 7373248.
Article
12. Azouvi P, Bartolomeo P, Beis JM, Perennou D, Pradat-Diehl P, Rousseaux M. A battery of tests for the quantitative assessment of unilateral neglect. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2006; 24:273–285. PMID: 17119304.
13. Dubois B, Slachevsky A, Litvan I, Pillon B. The FAB: a Frontal Assessment Battery at bedside. Neurology. 2000; 55:1621–1626. PMID: 11113214.
Article
14. Sousa VD, Rojjanasrirat W. Translation, adaptation and validation of instruments or scales for use in cross-cultural health care research: a clear and user-friendly guideline. J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17:268–274. PMID: 20874835.
Article
15. Godefroy O, Fickl A, Roussel M, Auribault C, Bugnicourt JM, Lamy C, et al. Is the Montreal Cognitive Assessment superior to the Mini-Mental State Examination to detect poststroke cognitive impairment? A study with neuropsychological evaluation. Stroke. 2011; 42:1712–1716. PMID: 21474808.
Article
16. Giordano PC, Alexandre NM, Rodrigues RC, Coluci MZ. The Pain Disability Questionnaire: a reliability and validity study. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2012; 20:76–83. PMID: 22481724.
Article
17. Kertesz A, Poole E. The aphasia quotient: the taxonomic approach to measurement of aphasic disability. 1974. Can J Neurol Sci. 2004; 31:175–184. PMID: 15198441.
18. Leys D, Henon H, Mackowiak-Cordoliani MA, Pasquier F. Poststroke dementia. Lancet Neurol. 2005; 4:752–759. PMID: 16239182.
Article
19. Babulal GM, Huskey TN, Roe CM, Goette SA, Connor LT. Cognitive impairments and mood disruptions negatively impact instrumental activities of daily living performance in the first three months after a first stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015; 22:144–151. PMID: 25936546.
Article
20. Park J, Lee G, Lee SU, Jung SH. The impact of acute phase domain-specific cognitive function on post-stroke functional recovery. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40:214–222. PMID: 27152270.
Article
21. Jokinen H, Melkas S, Ylikoski R, Pohjasvaara T, Kaste M, Erkinjuntti T, et al. Post-stroke cognitive impairment is common even after successful clinical recovery. Eur J Neurol. 2015; 22:1288–1294. PMID: 26040251.
Article
22. Murray LL. Attention and other cognitive deficits in aphasia: presence and relation to language and communication measures. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012; 21:S51–S64. PMID: 22230179.
Article
23. Wright HH, Fergadiotis G. Conceptualizing and measuring working memory and its relationship to aphasia. Aphasiology. 2012; 26:258–278. PMID: 22639480.
24. Lee B, Pyun SB. Characteristics of cognitive impairment in patients with post-stroke aphasia. Ann Rehabil Med. 2014; 38:759–765. PMID: 25566474.
Article
25. Kang EK, Jeong HS, Moon ER, Lee JY, Lee KJ. Cognitive and language function in aphasic patients assessed with the Korean version of mini-mental status examination. Ann Rehabil Med. 2016; 40:152–161. PMID: 26949682.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr