J Korean Diabetes.  2017 Jun;18(2):88-101. 10.4093/jkd.2017.18.2.88.

Radiologic Evaluation of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Diabetic Patient

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Geriatrics, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. cokim@yuhs.ac
  • 2Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), traditionally considered as a disease of hepatologists, has recently become a major concern in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) as T2DM seems to worsen the course of NAFLD and vice versa. Furthermore, the increasing prevalence of NAFLD in T2DM and the complex mechanisms between these two diseases make physicians caring for patients with T2DM face many uncertainties in the diagnosis of NAFLD. Although the liver biopsy is considered as the gold standard of the diagnosis of NAFLD so far, it has several limitations such as infection, bleeding and cost. Hence, radiologic evaluations have been increasingly accepted as noninvasive alternatives to liver biopsy. Currently, 4 major imaging tools are available for measuring liver fat, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging and liver fibroscan. This article will describe these methods used to evaluate hepatic steatosis in patients with T2DM, including the diagnostic accuracy, limitations, and practical applicability.

Keyword

Computed tomography; Fatty liver; Liver fibroscan; Magnetic resonance spectroscopy; Ultrasonography

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Diagnosis
Fatty Liver
Hemorrhage
Humans
Liver
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy
Non-alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease*
Prevalence
Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Measuring hepatic steatosis by computed tomography (CT) scan (Hounsfield unit, HU). (A) With non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). NAFLD: liver HU was lower than 60 (5). So, liver/spleen HU ratio was below 0.9 (0.09). (B) Without NAFLD. Normal patient: liver HU was higher than 60 (62). Hence, liver/spleen HU ratio was higher than 0.9 (1.16).

  • Fig. 2 Measuring hepatic steatosis by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MRS, magnetic resonance spectroscopy.

  • Fig. 3 Basic concept of liver fibroscan. CAP, controlled attenuation parameter.

  • Fig. 4 Measurement of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP).

  • Fig. 5 Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) result.


Reference

1. Clark JM, Diehl AM. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: an underrecognized cause of cryptogenic cirrhosis. JAMA. 2003; 289:3000–3004.
2. Sattar N, Forrest E, Preiss D. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. BMJ. 2014; 349:g4596.
Article
3. Marjot T, Cobbold J. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Liver disease in clinical practice. Cham: Springer;2017. p. 111–129.
4. Michelotti GA, Machado MV, Diehl AM. NAFLD, NASH and liver cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:656–665.
Article
5. Loomba R, Sanyal AJ. The global NAFLD epidemic. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:686–690.
Article
6. Anstee QM, Targher G, Day CP. Progression of NAFLD to diabetes mellitus, cardiovascular disease or cirrhosis. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 10:330–344.
Article
7. Kim SK, Choi YJ, Huh BW, Park SW, Lee EJ, Cho YW, Huh KB. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is associated with increased carotid intima-media thickness only in type 2 diabetic subjects with insulin resistance. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 99:1879–1884.
Article
8. Younossi ZM, Gramlich T, Matteoni CA, Boparai N, McCullough AJ. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 2:262–265.
Article
9. Cusi K, Sanyal AJ, Zhang S, Hartman ML, Bue-Valleskey JM, Hoogwerf BJ, Haupt A. Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) prevalence and its metabolic associations in patients with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2017; DOI: 10.1111/dom.12973. [Epub ahead of print].
Article
10. Leite NC, Salles GF, Araujo AL, Villela-Nogueira CA, Cardoso CR. Prevalence and associated factors of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. Liver Int. 2009; 29:113–119.
Article
11. Targher G, Bertolini L, Poli F, Rodella S, Scala L, Tessari R, Zenari L, Falezza G. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and risk of future cardiovascular events among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes. 2005; 54:3541–3546.
Article
12. Prashanth M, Ganesh HK, Vima MV, John M, Bandgar T, Joshi SR, Shah SR, Rathi PM, Joshi AS, Thakkar H, Menon PS, Shah NS. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Assoc Physicians India. 2009; 57:205–210.
13. Gupte P, Amarapurkar D, Agal S, Baijal R, Kulshrestha P, Pramanik S, Patel N, Madan A, Amarapurkar A, Hafeezunnisa . Non-alcoholic steatohepatitis in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004; 19:854–858.
Article
14. Adams LA, Lymp JF, St Sauver J, Sanderson SO, Lindor KD, Feldstein A, Angulo P. The natural history of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: a population-based cohort study. Gastroenterology. 2005; 129:113–121.
Article
15. Yoon HJ, Lee Y, Cha BS. Causal relationship of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with obesity and insulin resistance. J Korean Diabetes. 2014; 15:76–81.
Article
16. European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL). European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). European Association for the Study of Obesity (EASO). EASL-EASD-EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Hepatol. 2016; 64:1388–1402.
17. Korean Association for the Study of the Liver (KASL). KASL clinical practice guidelines: management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Clin Mol Hepatol. 2013; 19:325–348.
18. Nascimbeni F, Pais R, Bellentani S, Day CP, Ratziu V, Loria P, Lonardo A. From NAFLD in clinical practice to answers from guidelines. J Hepatol. 2013; 59:859–871.
Article
19. Chalasani N, Younossi Z, Lavine JE, Diehl AM, Brunt EM, Cusi K, Charlton M, Sanyal AJ. The diagnosis and management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: practice Guideline by the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, American College of Gastroenterology, and the American Gastroenterological Association. Hepatology. 2012; 55:2005–2023.
Article
20. Adams LA, Waters OR, Knuiman MW, Elliott RR, Olynyk JK. NAFLD as a risk factor for the development of diabetes and the metabolic syndrome: an eleven-year follow-up study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2009; 104:861–867.
Article
21. Shibata M, Kihara Y, Taguchi M, Tashiro M, Otsuki M. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease is a risk factor for type 2 diabetes in middle-aged Japanese men. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30:2940–2944.
Article
22. Liu M, Wang J, Zeng J, Cao X, He Y. Association of NAFLD with diabetes and the impact of BMI changes: a 5-year cohort study based on 18,507 elderly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017; 102:1309–1316.
Article
23. Yamazaki H, Tsuboya T, Tsuji K, Dohke M, Maguchi H. Independent association between improvement of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and reduced incidence of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38:1673–1679.
Article
24. Ratziu V, Charlotte F, Heurtier A, Gombert S, Giral P, Bruckert E, Grimaldi A, Capron F, Poynard T. LIDO Study Group. Sampling variability of liver biopsy in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2005; 128:1898–1906.
Article
25. Wai CT, Tan LH, Kaur M, Da Costa M, Quak SH, Tan KC. Pitfalls in interpreting liver biopsy results: the story of the blind men and the elephant. Liver Transpl. 2002; 8:1200–1201.
Article
26. Alkhouri N, Feldstein AE. Noninvasive diagnosis of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: are we there yet? Metabolism. 2016; 65:1087–1095.
Article
27. Lăpădat AM, Jianu IR, Ungureanu BS, Florescu LM, Gheonea DI, Sovaila S, Gheonea IA. Non-invasive imaging techniques in assessing non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a current status of available methods. J Med Life. 2017; 10:19–26.
Article
28. Lee SS, Park SH. Radiologic evaluation of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:7392–7402.
Article
29. Hepburn MJ, Vos JA, Fillman EP, Lawitz EJ. The accuracy of the report of hepatic steatosis on ultrasonography in patients infected with hepatitis C in a clinical setting: a retrospective observational study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2005; 5:14.
Article
30. de Alwis NM, Anstee QM, Day CP. How to diagnose nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Dig Dis. 2016; 34:Suppl 1. 19–26.
Article
31. Saadeh S, Younossi ZM, Remer EM, Gramlich T, Ong JP, Hurley M, Mullen KD, Cooper JN, Sheridan MJ. The utility of radiological imaging in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Gastroenterology. 2002; 123:745–750.
Article
32. van Werven JR, Marsman HA, Nederveen AJ, Smits NJ, ten Kate FJ, van Gulik TM, Stoker J. Assessment of hepatic steatosis in patients undergoing liver resection: comparison of US, CT, T1-weighted dual-echo MR imaging, and point-resolved 1H MR spectroscopy. Radiology. 2010; 256:159–168.
Article
33. Strauss S, Gavish E, Gottlieb P, Katsnelson L. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in the sonographic assessment of fatty liver. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189:W320–W323.
Article
34. de Moura Almeida A, Cotrim HP, Barbosa DB, de Athayde LG, Santos AS, Bitencourt AG, de Freitas LA, Rios A, Alves E. Fatty liver disease in severe obese patients: diagnostic value of abdominal ultrasound. World J Gastroenterol. 2008; 14:1415–1418.
Article
35. Williams CD, Stengel J, Asike MI, Torres DM, Shaw J, Contreras M, Landt CL, Harrison SA. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis among a largely middle-aged population utilizing ultrasound and liver biopsy: a prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2011; 140:124–131.
Article
36. Musso G, Gambino R, Cassader M, Pagano G. Metaanalysis: natural history of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for liver disease severity. Ann Med. 2011; 43:617–649.
Article
37. Targher G, Bertolini L, Padovani R, Rodella S, Tessari R, Zenari L, Day C, Arcaro G. Prevalence of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and its association with cardiovascular disease among type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care. 2007; 30:1212–1218.
Article
38. Lawrence DA, Oliva IB, Israel GM. Detection of hepatic steatosis on contrast-enhanced CT images: diagnostic accuracy of identification of areas of presumed focal fatty sparing. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199:44–47.
Article
39. Kim DY, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim HJ, Kim SY, Kim MY, Lee Y, Kim TK, Khalili K, Bae MH, Lee JY, Lee SG, Yu ES. Contrast-enhanced computed tomography for the diagnosis of fatty liver: prospective study with sameday biopsy used as the reference standard. Eur Radiol. 2010; 20:359–366.
Article
40. Wells MM, Li Z, Addeman B, McKenzie CA, Mujoomdar A, Beaton M, Bird J. Computed tomography measurement of hepatic steatosis: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in a Canadian population. Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 2016:4930987.
Article
41. Park YS, Park SH, Lee SS, Kim DY, Shin YM, Lee W, Lee SG, Yu ES. Biopsy-proven nonsteatotic liver in adults: estimation of reference range for difference in attenuation between the liver and the spleen at nonenhanced CT. Radiology. 2011; 258:760–766.
Article
42. Patrick D, White FE, Adams PC. Long-term amiodarone therapy: a cause of increased hepatic attenuation on CT. Br J Radiol. 1984; 57:573–576.
Article
43. Tota-Maharaj R, Blaha MJ, Zeb I, Katz R, Blankstein R, Blumenthal RS, Budoff MJ, Nasir K. Ethnic and sex differences in fatty liver on cardiac computed tomography: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Mayo Clin Proc. 2014; 89:493–503.
Article
44. Pickhardt PJ, Park SH, Hahn L, Lee SG, Bae KT, Yu ES. Specificity of unenhanced CT for non-invasive diagnosis of hepatic steatosis: implications for the investigation of the natural history of incidental steatosis. Eur Radiol. 2012; 22:1075–1082.
Article
45. Bae JC, Lee WY, Yoon KH, Park JY, Son HS, Han KA, Lee KW, Woo JT, Ju YC, Lee WJ, Cho YY, Lee MK. Improvement of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with Carnitine-Orotate Complex in Type 2 Diabetes (CORONA): a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care. 2015; 38:1245–1252.
Article
46. Vu KN, Gilbert G, Chalut M, Chagnon M, Chartrand G, Tang A. MRI-determined liver proton density fat fraction, with MRS validation: comparison of regions of interest sampling methods in patients with type 2 diabetes. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 43:1090–1099.
Article
47. Dulai PS, Sirlin CB, Loomba R. MRI and MRE for noninvasive quantitative assessment of hepatic steatosis and fibrosis in NAFLD and NASH: clinical trials to clinical practice. J Hepatol. 2016; 65:1006–1016.
Article
48. Idilman IS, Aniktar H, Idilman R, Kabacam G, Savas B, Elhan A, Celik A, Bahar K, Karcaaltincaba M. Hepatic steatosis: quantification by proton density fat fraction with MR imaging versus liver biopsy. Radiology. 2013; 267:767–775.
Article
49. Idilman IS, Keskin O, Celik A, Savas B, Halil Elhan A, Idilman R, Karcaaltincaba M. A comparison of liver fat content as determined by magnetic resonance imagingproton density fat fraction and MRS versus liver histology in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. Acta Radiol. 2016; 57:271–278.
Article
50. Noworolski SM, Tien P, Westphalen A, Merriman R, Vigneron DB, Qayyum A. Mr spectroscopy of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2005; 13:336.
51. Szczepaniak LS, Nurenberg P, Leonard D, Browning JD, Reingold JS, Grundy S, Hobbs HH, Dobbins RL. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy to measure hepatic triglyceride content: prevalence of hepatic steatosis in the general population. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005; 288:E462–E468.
Article
52. Tang A, Tan J, Sun M, Hamilton G, Bydder M, Wolfson T, Gamst AC, Middleton M, Brunt EM, Loomba R, Lavine JE, Schwimmer JB, Sirlin CB. Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: MR imaging of liver proton density fat fraction to assess hepatic steatosis. Radiology. 2013; 267:422–431.
Article
53. Doycheva I, Cui J, Nguyen P, Costa EA, Hooker J, Hofflich H, Bettencourt R, Brouha S, Sirlin CB, Loomba R. Non-invasive screening of diabetics in primary care for NAFLD and advanced fibrosis by MRI and MRE. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2016; 43:83–95.
Article
54. Heba ER, Desai A, Zand KA, Hamilton G, Wolfson T, Schlein AN, Gamst A, Loomba R, Sirlin CB, Middleton MS. Accuracy and the effect of possible subject-based confounders of magnitude-based MRI for estimating hepatic proton density fat fraction in adults, using MR spectroscopy as reference. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016; 43:398–406.
Article
55. Permutt Z, Le TA, Peterson MR, Seki E, Brenner DA, Sirlin C, Loomba R. Correlation between liver histology and novel magnetic resonance imaging in adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease-MRI accurately quantifies hepatic steatosis in NAFLD. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2012; 36:22–29.
Article
56. Cui J, Philo L, Nguyen P, Hofflich H, Hernandez C, Bettencourt R, Richards L, Salotti J, Bhatt A, Hooker J, Haufe W, Hooker C, Brenner DA, Sirlin CB, Loomba R. Sitagliptin vs. placebo for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2016; 65:369–376.
Article
57. Macauley M, Hollingsworth KG, Smith FE, Thelwall PE, Al-Mrabeh A, Schweizer A, Foley JE, Taylor R. Effect of vildagliptin on hepatic steatosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015; 100:1578–1585.
Article
58. Wong VW, Chan RS, Wong GL, Cheung BH, Chu WC, Yeung DK, Chim AM, Lai JW, Li LS, Sea MM, Chan FK, Sung JJ, Woo J, Chan HL. Community-based lifestyle modification programme for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Hepatol. 2013; 59:536–542.
Article
59. Raptis DA, Fischer MA, Graf R, Nanz D, Weber A, Moritz W, Tian Y, Oberkofler CE, Clavien PA. MRI: the new reference standard in quantifying hepatic steatosis? Gut. 2012; 61:117–127.
Article
60. Averna M. The effect of ezetimibe on NAFLD. Atheroscler Suppl. 2015; 17:27–34.
Article
61. de Lédinghen V, Vergniol J, Capdepont M, Chermak F, Hiriart JB, Cassinotto C, Merrouche W, Foucher J, Brigitte le B. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for the diagnosis of steatosis: a prospective study of 5323 examinations. J Hepatol. 2014; 60:1026–1031.
Article
62. Chan WK, Nik Mustapha NR, Mahadeva S. Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection and quantification of hepatic steatosis in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 29:1470–1476.
Article
63. de Lédinghen V, Wong GL, Vergniol J, Chan HL, Hiriart JB, Chan AW, Chermak F, Choi PC, Foucher J, Chan CK, Merrouche W, Chim AM, Le Bail B, Wong VW. Controlled attenuation parameter for the diagnosis of steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016; 31:848–855.
Article
64. Kikuchi M, Umeda R, Tsuruya K, Shiozawa H, Kikuchi M, Takahashi M, Horie Y, Nishizaki Y. Diagnostic accuracy for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured by transient elastography. Hepatology. 2015; 62:1269A.
65. Chon YE, Jung KS, Kim SU, Park JY, Park YN, Kim DY, Ahn SH, Chon CY, Lee HW, Park Y, Han KH. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) for detection of hepatic steatosis in patients with chronic liver diseases: a prospective study of a native Korean population. Liver Int. 2014; 34:102–109.
Article
66. Kumar M, Rastogi A, Singh T, Behari C, Gupta E, Garg H, Kumar R, Bhatia V, Sarin SK. Controlled attenuation parameter for non-invasive assessment of hepatic steatosis: does etiology affect performance? J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013; 28:1194–1201.
Article
67. Shi KQ, Tang JZ, Zhu XL, Ying L, Li DW, Gao J, Fang YX, Li GL, Song YJ, Deng ZJ, Wu JM, Tang KF. Controlled attenuation parameter for the detection of steatosis severity in chronic liver disease: a meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014; 29:1149–1158.
Article
68. Mi YQ, Shi QY, Xu L, Shi RF, Liu YG, Li P, Shen F, Lu W, Fan JG. Controlled attenuation parameter for noninvasive assessment of hepatic steatosis using Fibroscan®: validation in chronic hepatitis B. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:243–251.
Article
69. Masaki K, Takaki S, Hyogo H, Kobayashi T, Fukuhara T, Naeshiro N, Honda Y, Nakahara T, Ohno A, Miyaki D, Murakami E, Nagaoki Y, Kawaoka T, Tsuge M, Hiraga N, Hiramatsu A, Imamura M, Kawakami Y, Aikata H, Ochi H, Takahashi S, Arihiro K, Chayama K. Utility of controlled attenuation parameter measurement for assessing liver steatosis in Japanese patients with chronic liver diseases. Hepatol Res. 2013; 43:1182–1189.
Article
70. Karlas T, Petroff D, Sasso M, Fan JG, Mi YQ, de Lédinghen V, Kumar M, Lupsor-Platon M, Han KH, Cardoso AC, Ferraioli G, Chan WK, Wong VW, Myers RP, Chayama K, Friedrich-Rust M, Beaugrand M, Shen F, Hiriart JB, Sarin SK, Badea R, Jung KS, Marcellin P, Filice C, Mahadeva S, Wong GL, Crotty P, Masaki K, Bojunga J, Bedossa P, Keim V, Wiegand J. Individual patient data meta-analysis of controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) technology for assessing steatosis. J Hepatol. 2017; 66:1022–1030.
Article
71. Runge JH, Smits L, Verheij J, Nederveen A, Beuers U, Stoker J. 1h-magnetic resonance spectroscopy is superior to controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) in assessing liver fat content in human non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Hepatology. 2015; 62:1256A.
72. Kwok R, Choi KC, Wong GL, Zhang Y, Chan HL, Luk AO, Shu SS, Chan AW, Yeung MW, Chan JC, Kong AP, Wong VW. Screening diabetic patients for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease with controlled attenuation parameter and liver stiffness measurements: a prospective cohort study. Gut. 2016; 65:1359–1368.
Article
73. Ferraioli G, Tinelli C, De Silvestri A, Lissandrin R, Above E, Dellafiore C, Poma G, Di Gregorio M, Maiocchi L, Maserati R, Filice C. The clinical value of controlled attenuation parameter for the noninvasive assessment of liver steatosis. Liver Int. 2016; 36:1860–1866.
Article
74. Chon YE, Kim KJ, Jung KS, Kim SU, Park JY, Kim do Y, Ahn SH, Chon CY, Chung JB, Park KH, Bae JC, Han KH. The relationship between type 2 diabetes mellitus and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease measured by controlled attenuation parameter. Yonsei Med J. 2016; 57:885–892.
Article
75. Chon YE, Jung KS, Kim KJ, Joo DJ, Kim BK, Park JY, Kim DY, Ahn SH, Han KH, Kim SU. Normal controlled attenuation parameter values: a prospective study of healthy subjects undergoing health checkups and liver donors in Korea. Dig Dis Sci. 2015; 60:234–242.
Article
76. Lee YH, Kim JH, Kim SR, Jin HY, Rhee EJ, Cho YM, Lee BW. Lobeglitazone, a novel thiazolidinedione, improves non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in type 2 diabetes: its efficacy and predictive factors related to responsiveness. J Korean Med Sci. 2017; 32:60–69.
Article
77. Kinner S, Reeder SB, Yokoo T. Quantitative imaging biomarkers of NAFLD. Dig Dis Sci. 2016; 61:1337–1347.
Article
78. Jayakumar S, Harrison SA, Loomba R. Noninvasive markers of fibrosis and inflammation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Curr Hepatol Rep. 2016; 15:86–95.
Article
79. Tang A, Chen J, Le TA, Changchien C, Hamilton G, Middleton MS, Loomba R, Sirlin CB. Cross-sectional and longitudinal evaluation of liver volume and total liver fat burden in adults with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Abdom Imaging. 2015; 40:26–37.
Article
80. Chan WK, Nik Mustapha NR, Wong GL, Wong VW, Mahadeva S. Controlled attenuation parameter using the FibroScan® XL probe for quantification of hepatic steatosis for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in an Asian population. United European Gastroenterol J. 2017; 5:76–85.
Article
81. Sasso M, Audière S, Kemgang A, Gaouar F, Corpechot C, Chazouillères O, Fournier C, Golsztejn O, Prince S, Menu Y, Sandrin L, Miette V. Liver steatosis assessed by controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) measured with the XL probe of the FibroScan: a pilot study assessing diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42:92–103.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKD
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr