J Adv Prosthodont.  2017 Jun;9(3):224-231. 10.4047/jap.2017.9.3.224.

Long-term evaluations of teeth and dental implants during dental maintenance period

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontology, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. leejm@knu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Prosthodontics, School of Dentistry, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3College of Pharmacy and Research Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea. sangkyu@knu.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was designed to evaluate the teeth and dental implants during dental maintenance therapy over 3 years in different conditions after periodontal and dental prosthetic treatment.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
166 patients received maintenance therapy. 59 patients were treated with 2% minocycline-HCl ointment as local drug delivery (LDD) (L group) and 107 patients were treated without LDD (NL group). Clinical data was collected in maintenance period for evaluation. Patients were classified into groups depending on the application of LDD with maintenance therapy, the type of dental treatment before maintenance period (Pre-Tx), the frequency (F-MT), and regularity (R-MT) of maintenance therapy.
RESULTS
The numbers of lost teeth (N-teeth, P=.003) and newly placed dental implants (N-implants, P=.022) are significantly different according to Pre-Tx. F-MT among patients who received surgical dental treatment before maintenance period showed statistical differences in N-teeth (P=.041), but not in N-implants (P=.564). All of the patients in L group showed high F-MT (F-MT1). In NL group, there were no statistical differences in N-teeth or N-implants according to F-MT or R-MT. In F-MT1 group, application of LDD made N-teeth significantly different from both Pre-Tx groups while no significant difference could be found in N-implant. Independent t-test and one-way ANOVA were selected for statistical analysis.
CONCLUSION
The regular maintenance therapy and LDD can be effective for teeth during maintenance period. It is not only pharmacological efficacy in decreasing bacterial species that makes LDD a useful adjunct. Application of LDD also motivates patients to take adequate check-ups in the aspects of both frequency and regularity.

Keyword

Long-Term Care; Minocycline; Tooth Loss

MeSH Terms

Dental Implants*
Humans
Long-Term Care
Minocycline
Tooth Loss
Tooth*
Dental Implants
Minocycline

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Independent-Samples Kruskal-Wallis test of number of lost teeth (N-teeth) and number of newly placed dental implants (N-implants) according to the frequency of maintenance therapy (F-MT), in patients who received surgical and nonsurgical pre-treatment (F-MT1, more than once in 6 months / F-MT2, once in a year / F-MT3, less than once in 2 years). (A) N-teeth according to F-MT, in patients who received surgical pre-treatment (B) N-implants according to F-MT, in patients who received surgical pre-treatment (C) N-teeth according to F-MT, in patients who received nonsurgical pre-treatment (D) N-implants according to F-MT, in patients who received nonsurgical pre-treatment. Significant statistical difference can be solely noticed in N-teeth of patients who received surgical pre-treatment (A, P = .041).

  • Fig. 2 Independent t-test of number of lost teeth (N-teeth, (A)) and number of newly placed dental implants (N-implants, (B)) according to application of 2% minocycline-HCl ointment as local drug delivery (LDD) (Appl-LDD), in patients who received surgical pre-treatment (L group, LDD applied / NL group, LDD not-applied). Also independent-samples Mann-Whiteney U test of N-teeth (C) and N-implants (D) according to application of LDD, in patients who received nonsurgical pre-treatment. This analysis is solely based on the patients in F-MT1 group. Significant statistical differences can be found in N-teeth according to the application of LDD ((A),(C)) regardless of the type of pre-treatment (P < .05).


Cited by  1 articles

3-dimensional analysis about the effects of aging and risk factors on changes in oral environment
Yong Yoon, Yong-Gun Kim, Sang-Kyu Lee, Jae-Mok Lee
J Adv Prosthodont. 2019;11(2):75-80.    doi: 10.4047/jap.2019.11.2.75.


Reference

1. Carnevale G, Cairo F, Tonetti MS. Long-term effects of supportive therapy in periodontal patients treated with fibre retention osseous resective surgery. II: tooth extractions during active and supportive therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2007; 34:342–348.
2. Lang NP, Tonetti MS. Periodontal risk assessment (PRA) for patients in supportive periodontal therapy (SPT). Oral Health Prev Dent. 2003; 1:7–16.
3. Socransky SS. Relationship of bacteria to the etiology of periodontal disease. J Dent Res. 1970; 49:203–222.
4. Socransky SS, Haffajee AD. The bacterial etiology of destructive periodontal disease: current concepts. J Periodontol. 1992; 63:322–331.
5. Ximénez-Fyvie LA, Haffajee AD, Socransky SS. Microbial composition of supra- and subgingival plaque in subjects with adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 2000; 27:722–732.
6. Loesche WJ, Syed SA, Schmidt E, Morrison EC. Bacterial profiles of subgingival plaques in periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1985; 56:447–456.
7. Slots J, Emrich LJ, Genco RJ, Rosling BG. Relationship between some subgingival bacteria and periodontal pocket depth and gain or loss of periodontal attachment after treatment of adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1985; 12:540–552.
8. Rateitschak-Plüss EM, Schwarz JP, Guggenheim R, Düggelin M, Rateitschak KH. Non-surgical periodontal treatment: where are the limits? An SEM study. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19:240–244.
9. Adriaens PA, De Boever JA, Loesche WJ. Bacterial invasion in root cementum and radicular dentin of periodontally diseased teeth in humans. A reservoir of periodontopathic bacteria. J Periodontol. 1988; 59:222–230.
10. Adriaens PA, Edwards CA, De Boever JA, Loesche WJ. Ultrastructural observations on bacterial invasion in cementum and radicular dentin of periodontally diseased human teeth. J Periodontol. 1988; 59:493–503.
11. Loesche WJ. The specific plaque hypothesis and the antimicrobial treatment of periodontal disease. Dent Update. 1992; 19:6870–72. 74
12. Wilson M, O'Connor B, Newman HN. Effect of minocycline on subgingival plaque bacteria. J Appl Bacteriol. 1990; 69:228–234.
13. O'Connor BC, Newman HN, Wilson M. Susceptibility and resistance of plaque bacteria to minocycline. J Periodontol. 1990; 61:228–233.
14. Ciancio SG, Slots J, Reynolds HS, Zambon JJ, McKenna JD. The effect of short-term administration of minocycline HCl on gingival inflammation and subgingival microflora. J Periodontol. 1982; 53:557–561.
15. Nakagawa T, Yamada S, Oosuka Y, Saito A, Hosaka Y, Ishikawa T, Okuda K. Clinical and microbiological study of local minocycline delivery (Periocline) following scaling and root planing in recurrent periodontal pockets. Bull Tokyo Dent Coll. 1991; 32:63–70.
16. van Steenberghe D, Bercy P, Kohl J, De Boever J, Adriaens P, Vanderfaeillie A, Adriaenssen C, Rompen E, De Vree H, McCarthy EF, et al. Subgingival minocycline hydrochloride ointment in moderate to severe chronic adult periodontitis: a randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, multicenter study. J Periodontol. 1993; 64:637–644.
17. Lu HK, Chei CJ. Efficacy of subgingivally applied minocycline in the treatment of chronic periodontitis. J Periodontal Res. 2005; 40:20–27.
18. Matuliene G, Pjetursson BE, Salvi GE, Schmidlin K, Brägger U, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. Influence of residual pockets on progression of periodontitis and tooth loss: results after 11 years of maintenance. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35:685–695.
19. König J, Plagmann HC, Rühling A, Kocher T. Tooth loss and pocket probing depths in compliant periodontally treated patients: a retrospective analysis. J Clin Periodontol. 2002; 29:1092–1100.
20. Chambrone L, Chambrone D, Lima LA, Chambrone LA. Predictors of tooth loss during long-term periodontal maintenance: a systematic review of observational studies. J Clin Periodontol. 2010; 37:675–684.
21. Lindhe J, Nyman S. Long-term maintenance of patients treated for advanced periodontal disease. J Clin Periodontol. 1984; 11:504–514.
22. Rosén B, Olavi G, Badersten A, Rönström A, Söderholm G, Egelberg J. Effect of different frequencies of preventive maintenance treatment on periodontal conditions. 5-Year observations in general dentistry patients. J Clin Periodontol. 1999; 26:225–233.
23. Brägger U, Håkanson D, Lang NP. Progression of periodontal disease in patients with mild to moderate adult periodontitis. J Clin Periodontol. 1992; 19:659–666.
24. van Steenberghe D, Rosling B, Söder PO, Landry RG, van der Velden U, Timmerman MF, McCarthy EF, Vandenhoven G, Wouters C, Wilson M, Matthews J, Newman HN. A 15-month evaluation of the effects of repeated subgingival minocycline in chronic adult periodontitis. J Periodontol. 1999; 70:657–667.
25. Ng MC, Ong MM, Lim LP, Koh CG, Chan YH. Tooth loss in compliant and non-compliant periodontally treated patients: 7 years after active periodontal therapy. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:499–508.
Full Text Links
  • JAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr