J Educ Eval Health Prof.  2013;10:12.

The retrospective chart review: important methodological considerations

• Matt V
• Matthew H

Abstract

In this paper, we review and discuss ten common methodological mistakes found in retrospective chart reviews. The retrospective chart review is a widely applicable research methodology that can be used by healthcare disciplines as a means to direct subsequent prospective investigations. In many cases in this review, we have also provided suggestions or accessible resources that researchers can apply as a "best practices" guide when planning, conducting, or reviewing this investigative method.

Keyword

Best practices; Chart review; Medical record; Methodology; Retrospective review

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Medical Records
Practice Guidelines as Topic
Research Design
Retrospective Studies*

Reference

1. Worster A, Haines T. Advanced statistics: understanding medical record review (MRR) studies. Acad Emerg Med. 2004; 11:187–192. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1553-2712.2004.tb01433.x.

2. Gearing RE, Mian IA, Barber J, Ickowicz A. A methodology for conducting retrospective chart review research in child and adolescent psychiatry. J Can Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2006; 15:126–134.

3. Gilbert EH, Lowenstein SR, Koziol-McLain J, Barta D, Steiner J. Chart reviews in emergency medicine research: Where are the methods? Ann Emerg Med. 1996; 27:305–308.

4. Findley TW, Daum MC. Research in physical medicine and rehabilitation. III. The chart review or how to use clinical data for exploratory retrospective studies. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1989; 68:150–157.

5. Lipowski EE. Developing great research questions. Am J Health-Syst Pharm. 2008; 65:1667–1670.

6. Morgan GA, Harmon RJ. Research questions and hypotheses. Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2000; 39:261–263. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00004583-200002000-00028.

7. Meadows KA. So you want to do research? 2: developing the research question. Br J Community Nurs. 2003; 8:397–403.

8. Marrie TJ, Shariatzadeh MR. Community-acquired pneumonia requiring admission to an intensive care unit: a descriptive study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2007; 86:103–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0b013e3180421c16.

9. Lesher JM, Dreyfuss P, Hager N, Kaplan M, Furman M. Hip joint pain referral patterns: a descriptive study. Pain Med. 2008; 9:22–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4637.2006.00153.x.

10. Newton JT, Bower EJ, Williams AC. Research in primary dental care. Part 2: Developing a research question. Brit Dent J. 2004; 196:605–608. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.bdj.4811285.

11. Strassburg MA, Greenland S, Wang S. A correlational study of neural tube defects and infectious diseases. Public Health. 1983; 97:275–284. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0033-3506(83)80104-8.

12. Kallel H, Mahjoubi F, Dammak H, Bahloul M, Hamida CB, Chelly H, et al. Correlation between antibiotic use and changes in susceptibility patterns of pseudomonas aeruginosa in a medicalsurgical intensive care unit. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2008; 12:18–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.40945.

13. Finfer S, Bellomo R, Boyce N, French J, Myburgh J, Norton R, et al. A comparison of albumin and saline for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2004; 350:2247–2256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa040232.

14. Gardner CD, Kiazand A, Alhassan S, Kim S, Stafford RS, Balise RR, et al. Comparison of the Atkins, Zone, Ornish, and LEARN diets for change in weight and related risk factors among overweight premenopausal women: the A TO Z Weight Loss Study: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2007; 297:969–977. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.297.9.969.

15. Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, Buchner A. G*Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behav Res Methods. 2007; 39:175–191.

16. Trochim WM, Donnelly JP. The research methods knowledge base. 3rd ed.Cincinnati (OH): Atomic Dog Publishing;2008. 361 p.

17. Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach burnout inventory manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto (CA): Consulting Psychologists Press Inc.;1996. 52 p.

18. Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain. Surg Clin North Am. 1999; 79:231–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(05)70381-9.

19. Melzack R, Casey KL. Sensory, motivational, and central control determinants of pain: a new conceptual model. In: Kenshalo DR, editor. The skin senses. Springfield (IL): Charles C Thomas Publisher;1968. p. 423–443.

20. Banks NJ. Designing medical record abstraction forms. Int J Qual Health Care. 1998; 10:163–167.

21. Randoph J. Online Kappa calculator [Internet]. 2008. [cited 2013 Sep 27]. Available from: http://justus.randolph.name/kappa.

22. IBM SPSS Software [Internet]. [cited 2013 Sep 27]. Available from: www.ibm.com/software/analytics/spss.

23. R Project for Statistical Computing [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 18]. Available from: http://www.r-project.org.

24. Howell D. Intraclass correlation [Internet]. [revised 2002 Sep 15, cited 2013 Sep 27]. Available from: http://www.uvm.edu/~dhowell/StatPages/More_Stuff/icc/icc.html.

25. Lalanne C. Aliquote.org: computing intraclass correlation with R [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 18]. Available from: http://aliquote.org/memos/2011/04/29/computing-intraclass-correlation-with-r.

26. Zaionitz C. Real statistics using Excel [Internet]. [cited 2013 Nov 18]. Available from: http://www.real-statistics.com/reliability/intraclass-correlation.

27. Code of Federal Regulations [Internet]. 2009 Jan 15 [revised 2010 Jan, cited 2013 Sep 25]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/humansubjects/guidance/45cfr46.html.

28. HIPAA Administrative Simplification Statute and Rules [Internet]. US Department of Health and Human Services. [cited 2012 Nov 26]. Available from: http://www.hhs.gov/ocr/privacy/hipaa/administrative/index.html.

29. Pabrai UO. HIPAA certification [Internet]. Boston: Premier Press;2003. [cited 2012 Nov 26]. Available from: http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=nlebk&AN=101179&site=ehost-live.