Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.  2017 Jun;10(2):129-136. 10.21053/ceo.2016.00031.

Normative Hearing Threshold Levels in Koreans with Normal Tympanic Membranes and Estimated Prevalence of Hearing Loss

• Park HJ
• Yoo MH
• Baek SY
• Kim SW
• Cho YS

• KMID: 2380429
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.00031

Abstract

OBJECTIVES
We investigated the normative data on the hearing threshold levels of Koreans with normal tympanic membranes and the prevalence of hearing loss (HL) and nonserviceable hearing using the data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys (KNHANES) during 2010-2012.
METHODS
Data obtained from 16,673 participants ≥12-year-of-age with normal tympanic membranes who completed audiometric testing. We defined HL as the pure tone average (PTA) >25 dB hearing level at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 Hz and non-serviceable hearing as PTA >40 dB hearing level.
RESULTS
The hearing levels at some frequencies (0.5, 3, and 6 kHz) did not differ in between the 10's and 20's, but the hearing thresholds at all frequencies increased gradually from the 30's. The hearing thresholds were higher in men than in women at high frequencies (3, 4, and 6 kHz) in the 30's and older. The prevalence of HL in either ear was 16.5% (estimates of 5.9 million), from 2.4% in the 10's up to 75.4% in the 70's and older. The prevalence of nonserviceable hearing in either ear was 6.8% (estimates of 2.5 million) and that of bilateral nonserviceable hearing was 2.5% (estimates of 0.9 million).
CONCLUSION
Hearing loss aggravated from the 30's at all frequencies and men showed poorer hearing levels than women at high frequencies. Hearing loss was a common condition and the prevalence of non-serviceable hearing in either ear, which needs hearing rehabilitation to help social communication, was 6.8%. Normative pure tone thresholds at each frequency can be used as referent values when counseling patients complaining of hearing loss.

Keyword

Hearing Loss; Normative Data; Pure Tone; Audiometry; Thresholds

MeSH Terms

Audiometry
Counseling
Ear
Female
Hearing Loss*
Hearing*
Humans
Korea
Male
Prevalence*
Rehabilitation
Tympanic Membrane*

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1. Mean hearing threshold levels at each frequency in Korean men (A) and women (B).

• 

  Fig. 2. Changes of mean hearing levels with ages in Korean men (A) and women (B). In men, there was no significant difference in hearing levels in between the 10’s and 20’s in all frequencies except 4 kHz and hearing thresholds increased with ages beyond the 20’s at all frequencies (P<0.001). Women showed no significant difference in hearing levels in between the 10’s and 20’s in all frequencies and hearing thresholds increased with ages beyond the 20’s at all frequencies (P<0.001).

Reference

1. Herbst KG, Humphrey C. Hearing impairment and mental state in the elderly living at home. Br Med J. 1980; Oct. 281(6245):903–5.

2. Kim S, Lim EJ, Kim HS, Park JH, Jarng SS, Lee SH. Sex differences in a cross sectional study of age-related hearing loss in Korean. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; Mar. 3(1):27–31.

3. Cho YS, Choi SH, Park KH, Park HJ, Kim JW, Moon IJ, et al. Prevalence of otolaryngologic diseases in South Korea: data from the Korea national health and nutrition examination survey 2008. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol. 2010; Dec. 3(4):183–93.

4. Kim HN, Kim SG, Lee HK, Ohrr H, Moon SK, Chi J, et al. Incidence of presbycusis of Korean populations in Seoul, Kyunggi and Kangwon provinces. J Korean Med Sci. 2000; Oct. 15(5):580–4.

5. Cooper JC Jr. Health and Nutrition Examination Survey of 1971-75: part I. ear and race effects in hearing. J Am Acad Audiol. 1994; Jan. 5(1):30–6.

6. Helzner EP, Cauley JA, Pratt SR, Wisniewski SR, Zmuda JM, Talbott EO, et al. Race and sex differences in age-related hearing loss: the Health, Aging and Body Composition Study. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005; Dec. 53(12):2119–27.

7. Borchgrevink HM, Tambs K, Hoffman HJ. The Nord-Trondelag Norway Audiometric Survey 1996-98: unscreened thresholds and prevalence of hearing impairment for adults > 20 years. Noise Health. 2005; Jul-Sep. 7(28):1–15.

8. Flamme GA, Deiters K, Needham T. Distributions of pure tone hearing threshold levels among adolescents and adults in the United States by gender, ethnicity, and age: results from the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Int J Audiol. 2011; Mar. 50 Suppl 1:S11–20.

9. Rodriguez Valiente A, Roldan Fidalgo A, Garcia Berrocal JR, Ramirez Camacho R. Hearing threshold levels for an otologically screened population in Spain. Int J Audiol. 2015; Aug. 54(8):499–506.

10. Lin CY, Yang YC, Guo YL, Wu CH, Chang CJ, Wu JL. Prevalence of hearing impairment in an adult population in Southern Taiwan. Int J Audiol. 2007; Dec. 46(12):732–7.

11. Molvaer OI, Vardal L, Gundersen T, Halmrast T. Hearing acuity in a Norwegian standard population. Scand Audiol. 1983; 12(4):229–36.

12. Williams W, Carter L, Seeto M. Hearing threshold levels for a population of 11 to 35 year old Australian females and males. Int J Audiol. 2014; May. 53(5):289–93.

13. Borchgrevink HM. Does health promotion work in relation to noise? Noise Health. 2003; Jan-Mar. 5(18):25–30.

14. Davis AC. The prevalence of hearing impairment and reported hearing disability among adults in Great Britain. Int J Epidemiol. 1989; Dec. 18(4):911–7.

15. Wilson DH, Walsh PG, Sanchez L, Davis AC, Taylor AW, Tucker G, et al. The epidemiology of hearing impairment in an Australian adult population. Int J Epidemiol. 1999; Apr. 28(2):247–52.

16. Lin FR, Niparko JK, Ferrucci L. Hearing loss prevalence in the United States. Arch Intern Med. 2011; Nov. 171(20):1851–2.

17. Jun HJ, Hwang SY, Lee SH, Lee JE, Song JJ, Chae S. The prevalence of hearing loss in South Korea: data from a population-based study. Laryngoscope. 2015; Mar. 125(3):690–4.

18. Schuknecht HF, Gacek MR. Cochlear pathology in presbycusis. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 1993; Jan. 102(1 Pt 2):1–16.

19. Mills DM, Schmiedt RA. Metabolic presbycusis: differential changes in auditory brainstem and otoacoustic emission responses with chronic furosemide application in the gerbil. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2004; Mar. 5(1):1–10.

20. Gussekloo J, de Bont LE, von Faber M, Eekhof JA, de Laat JA, Hulshof JH, et al. Auditory rehabilitation of older people from the general population: the Leiden 85-plus study. Br J Gen Pract. 2003; Jul. 53(492):536–40.

21. Yueh B, Collins MP, Souza PE, Boyko EJ, Loovis CF, Heagerty PJ, et al. Long-term effectiveness of screening for hearing loss: the screening for auditory impairment: which hearing assessment test (SAIWHAT) randomized trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2010; Mar. 58(3):427–34.

22. Boothroyd A. Adult aural rehabilitation: what is it and does it work? Trends Amplif. 2007; Jun. 11(2):63–71.

23. Chisolm TH, Johnson CE, Danhauer JL, Portz LJ, Abrams HB, Lesner S, et al. A systematic review of health-related quality of life and hearing aids: final report of the American Academy of Audiology Task Force On the Health-Related Quality of Life Benefits of Amplification in Adults. J Am Acad Audiol. 2007; Feb. 18(2):151–83.

24. Agrawal Y, Platz EA, Niparko JK. Prevalence of hearing loss and differences by demographic characteristics among US adults: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1999-2004. Arch Intern Med. 2008; Jul. 168(14):1522–30.