Clin Endosc.  2015 Nov;48(6):459-460. 10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.459.

Can AIMS65 Save the Endoscopists from Midnight Calls?

• Kim JS
• Kim BW

• KMID: 2380399
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5946/ce.2015.48.6.459

Abstract

No abstract available.

Reference

1. Gralnek IM, Dumonceau JM, Kuipers EJ, et al. Diagnosis and management of nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Guideline. Endoscopy. 2015; 47:a1–a46.

2. Saltzman JR, Tabak YP, Hyett BH, Sun X, Travis AC, Johannes RS. A simple risk score accurately predicts in-hospital mortality, length of stay, and cost in acute upper GI bleeding. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011; 74:1215–1224.

3. Thandassery RB, Sharma M, John AK, et al. Clinical application of AIMS65 scores to predict outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage. Clin Endosc. 2015; 48:380–384.

4. Park SW, Song YW, Tak DH, et al. The AIMS65 score is a useful predictor of mortality in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: urgent endoscopy in patients with high AIMS65 scores. Clin Endosc. 2015; 48:522–527.

5. Jung SH, Oh JH, Lee HY, et al. Is the AIMS65 score useful in predicting outcomes in peptic ulcer bleeding? World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20:1846–1851.