Healthc Inform Res.  2017 Apr;23(2):77-86. 10.4258/hir.2017.23.2.77.

2016 Year-in-Review of Clinical and Consumer Informatics: Analysis and Visualization of Keywords and Topics

Affiliations
  • 1College of Nursing, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea. hapark@snu.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVES
The objective of this study was to review and visualize the medical informatics field over the previous 12 months according to the frequencies of keywords and topics in papers published in the top four journals in the field and in Healthcare Informatics Research (HIR), an official journal of the Korean Society of Medical Informatics.
METHODS
A six-person team conducted an extensive review of the literature on clinical and consumer informatics. The literature was searched using keywords employed in the American Medical Informatics Association year-in-review process and organized into 14 topics used in that process. Data were analyzed using word clouds, social network analysis, and association rules.
RESULTS
The literature search yielded 370 references and 1,123 unique keywords. "˜Electronic Health Record' (EHR) (78.6%) was the most frequently appearing keyword in the articles published in the five studied journals, followed by "˜telemedicine' (2.1%). EHR (37.6%) was also the most frequently studied topic area, followed by clinical informatics (12.0%). However, "˜telemedicine' (17.0%) was the most frequently appearing keyword in articles published in HIR, followed by "˜telecommunications' (4.5%). Telemedicine (47.1%) was the most frequently studied topic area, followed by EHR (14.7%).
CONCLUSIONS
The study findings reflect the Korean government's efforts to introduce telemedicine into the Korean healthcare system and reactions to this from the stakeholders associated with telemedicine.

Keyword

Medical Informatics; Review; Text Mining; Computer Graphics

MeSH Terms

Computer Graphics
Data Mining
Delivery of Health Care
Informatics*
Medical Informatics
Telemedicine

Figure

  • Figure 1 Flowchart of literature selection.

  • Figure 2 Word clouds of keywords and topics of articles published in the five included journals. EHR: Electronic Health Record, EMR: Electronic Medical Record, NLP: natural language processing, PHR: personal health record, HIE: health information exchange.

  • Figure 3 Word clouds with keywords and topics of articles published in Healthcare Informatics Research. EHR: Electronic Health Record, HIE: health information exchange.

  • Figure 4 Visualization obtained by social network analysis of keywords of the articles published in the five journals. EHR: Electronic Health Record, NLP: natural language processing.

  • Figure 5 Visualization obtained by social network analysis of keywords of the articles published in Healthcare Informatics Research. EHR: Electronic Health Record.

  • Figure 6 Parallel coordinate plot for 19 association rules for keywords of the articles published in the five journals. PHR: personal health record, EHR: Electronic Health Record, NLP: natural language processing.

  • Figure 7 Parallel coordinate plot for 14 association rules for keywords of the articles published in Healthcare Informatics Research.


Reference

1. Herland M, Khoshgoftaar TM, Wald R. A review of data mining using big data in health informatics. J Big Data. 2014; 1:2.
Article
2. Yergens DW, Tam-Tham H, Minty EP. Visualization of the IMIA yearbook of medical informatics publications over the last 25 years. Yearb Med Inform. 2016; Suppl 1. S130–S138.
Article
3. MasysD. AMIA informatics 2006 year in review [Internet]. Washington (DC): AMIA Annual Symposium;2006. cited at 2016 Nov 29. Available from: http://faculty.washington.edu/dmasys/YearInReview/2006index.htm.
4. Roberts K, Boland MR, Pruinelli L, Dcruz J, Berry A, Georgsson M, et al. Biomedical informatics advancing the national health agenda: the AMIA 2015 year-in-review in clinical and consumer informatics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(e1):e185–e190.
Article
5. Hersh W, Ash J. AMIA Annual Symposium 2014 year in review [Internet]. Washington (DC): AMIA Annual Symposium;2014. cited 2016 Nov 29. Available from: https://dmice.ohsu.edu/hersh/yearinreview2014.html.
6. Hahsler M, Chelluboina S. Visualizing association rules: introduction to the R-extension package arulesViz. R Proj Modul. 2011; 2011:223–238.
7. Fridsma DB. Moving beyond the physician's EHR. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1277.
Article
8. Christensen B, Ellingsen G. Evaluating Model-Driven Development for large-scale EHRs through the openEHR approach. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 89:43–54.
Article
9. Cohen MF. Impact of the HITECH financial incentives on EHR adoption in small, physician-owned practices. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 94:143–154.
Article
10. Kannry J, Sengstack P, Thyvalikakath TP, Poikonen J, Middleton B, Payne T, et al. The Chief Clinical Informatics Officer (CCIO): AMIA Task Force report on CCIO knowledge, education, and skillset requirements. Appl Clin Inform. 2016; 7(1):143–176.
11. Longhurst CA, Pageler NM, Palma JP, Finnell JT, Levy BP, Yackel TR, et al. Early experiences of accredited clinical informatics fellowships. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016; 23(4):829–834.
Article
12. Zelmer J, Ronchi E, Hypponen H, Lupianez-Villanueva F, Codagnone C, Nohr C, et al. International health IT benchmarking: learning from cross-country comparisons. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017; 24(2):371–379.
Article
13. Berry AB, Butler KA, Harrington C, Braxton MO, Walker AJ, Pete N, et al. Using conceptual work products of health care to design health IT. J Biomed Inform. 2016; 59:15–30.
Article
14. Bourne PE, Bonazzi V, Dunn M, Green ED, Guyer M, Komatsoulis G, et al. The NIH Big Data to Knowledge (BD2K) initiative. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1114.
Article
15. Cooper GF, Bahar I, Becich MJ, Benos PV, Berg J, Espino JU, et al. The center for causal discovery of biomedical knowledge from big data. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1132–1136.
Article
16. Paten B, Diekhans M, Druker BJ, Friend S, Guinney J, Gassner N, et al. The NIH BD2K center for big data in translational genomics. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2015; 22(6):1143–1147.
Article
17. Klaassen B, van Beijnum BJ, Hermens HJ. Usability in telemedicine systems: a literature survey. Int J Med Inform. 2016; 93:57–69.
18. Kwon IH. High time to discuss future-oriented telemedicine. Healthc Inform Res. 2015; 21(4):211–212.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HIR
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr