J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg.  2017 Apr;43(2):70-76. 10.5125/jkaoms.2017.43.2.70.

Short dental implants in the posterior maxilla: a review of the literature

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • 2Department of Periodontics, School of Dentistry, Shahid Sadoughi University of Medical Sciences, Yazd, Iran. e.karami1361@gmail.com
  • 3International Branch, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to perform a literature review of short implants in the posterior maxilla and to assess the influence of different factors on implant success rate. A comprehensive search was conducted to retrieve articles published from 2004 to 2015 using short dental implants with lengths less than 10 mm in the posterior maxilla with at least one year of follow-up. Twenty-four of 253 papers were selected, reviewed, and produced the following results. (1) The initial survival rate of short implants in the posterior maxilla was not related to implant width, surface, or design; however, the cumulative success rate of rough-surface short implants was higher than that of machined-surface implants especially in performance of edentulous dental implants of length <7 mm. (2) While bone augmentation can be used for rehabilitation of the atrophic posterior maxilla, short dental implants may be an alternative approach with fewer biological complications. (3) The increased crown-to-implant (C/I) ratio and occlusal table (OT) values in short dental implants with favorable occlusal loading do not seem to cause peri-implant bone loss. Higher C/I ratio does not produce any negative influence on implant success. (4) Some approaches that decrease the stress in posterior short implants use an implant designed to increase bone-implant contact surface area, providing the patient with a mutually protected or canine guidance occlusion and splinting implants together with no cantilever load. The survival rate of short implants in the posterior edentulous maxilla is high, and applying short implants under strict clinical protocols seems to be a safe and predictable technique.

Keyword

Dental implants; Maxilla

MeSH Terms

Clinical Protocols
Dental Implants*
Dental Occlusion
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Maxilla*
Rehabilitation
Splints
Survival Rate
Dental Implants

Cited by  1 articles

7-mm-long dental implants: retrospective clinical outcomes in medically compromised patients
Truc Thi Hoang Nguyen, Mi Young Eo, Yun Ju Cho, Hoon Myoung, Soung Min Kim
J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;45(5):260-266.    doi: 10.5125/jkaoms.2019.45.5.260.


Reference

1. Sato T, Abe T, Nakamoto N, Tomaru Y, Koshikiya N, Nojima J, et al. Nicotine induces cell proliferation in association with cyclin D1 up-regulation and inhibits cell differentiation in association with p53 regulation in a murine pre-osteoblastic cell line. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2008; 377:126–130. PMID: 18835254.
Article
2. Mertens C, Meyer-Bäumer A, Kappel H, Hoffmann J, Steveling HG. Use of 8-mm and 9-mm implants in atrophic alveolar ridges: 10-year results. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27:1501–1508. PMID: 23189302.
3. Sennerby L, Roos J. Surgical determinants of clinical success of osseointegrated oral implants: a review of the literature. Int J Prosthodont. 1998; 11:408–420. PMID: 9922733.
4. Kim YK, Hwang JY, Yun PY. Relationship between prognosis of dental implants and maxillary sinusitis associated with the sinus elevation procedure. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:178–183. PMID: 23377064.
Article
5. Kim BJ, Lee JH. The retrospective study of survival rate of implants with maxillary sinus floor elevation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2010; 36:108–118.
Article
6. Morand M, Irinakis T. The challenge of implant therapy in the posterior maxilla: providing a rationale for the use of short implants. J Oral Implantol. 2007; 33:257–266. PMID: 17987857.
Article
7. Lee JH, Frias V, Lee KW, Wright RF. Effect of implant size and shape on implant success rates: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005; 94:377–381. PMID: 16198176.
Article
8. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Felice P, Karatzopoulos G, Worthington HV, Coulthard P. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: horizontal and vertical bone augmentation techniques for dental implant treatment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009; (4):CD003607. PMID: 19821311.
Article
9. Queiroz TP, Aguiar SC, Margonar R, de Souza Faloni AP, Gruber R, Luvizuto ER. Clinical study on survival rate of short implants placed in the posterior mandibular region: resonance frequency analysis. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26:1036–1042. PMID: 24735480.
Article
10. Esposito M, Felice P, Worthington HV. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (5):CD008397. PMID: 24825543.
Article
11. Kennedy KS, Jones EM, Kim DG, McGlumphy EA, Clelland NL. A prospective clinical study to evaluate early success of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013; 28:170–177. PMID: 23377063.
Article
12. Oikarinen K, Raustia AM, Hartikainen M. General and local contraindications for endosseal implants--an epidemiological panoramic radiograph study in 65-year-old subjects. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1995; 23:114–118. PMID: 7781299.
13. Misch CE, Steignga J, Barboza E, Misch-Dietsh F, Cianciola LJ, Kazor C. Short dental implants in posterior partial edentulism: a multicenter retrospective 6-year case series study. J Periodontol. 2006; 77:1340–1347. PMID: 16937587.
Article
14. Srinivasan M, Vazquez L, Rieder P, Moraguez O, Bernard JP, Belser UC. Efficacy and predictability of short dental implants (<8 mm): a critical appraisal of the recent literature. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27:1429–1437. PMID: 23189293.
15. Grant BT, Pancko FX, Kraut RA. Outcomes of placing short dental implants in the posterior mandible: a retrospective study of 124 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009; 67:713–717. PMID: 19304026.
Article
16. Nedir R, Bischof M, Briaux JM, Beyer S, Szmukler-Moncler S, Bernard JP. A 7-year life table analysis from a prospective study on ITI implants with special emphasis on the use of short implants. Results from a private practice. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:150–157. PMID: 15085870.
17. Testori T, Del Fabbro M, Feldman S, Vincenzi G, Sullivan D, Rossi R Jr, et al. A multicenter prospective evaluation of 2-months loaded Osseotite implants placed in the posterior jaws: 3-year follow-up results. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13:154–161. PMID: 11952735.
Article
18. Monje A, Chan HL, Fu JH, Suarez F, Galindo-Moreno P, Wang HL. Are short dental implants (<10 mm) effective? a meta-analysis on prospective clinical trials. J Periodontol. 2013; 84:895–904. PMID: 22917114.
19. Romeo E, Chiapasco M, Ghisolfi M, Vogel G. Long-term clinical effectiveness of oral implants in the treatment of partial edentulism. Seven-year life table analysis of a prospective study with ITI dental implants system used for single-tooth restorations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2002; 13:133–143. PMID: 11952733.
20. Atieh MA, Zadeh H, Stanford CM, Cooper LF. Survival of short dental implants for treatment of posterior partial edentulism: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2012; 27:1323–1331. PMID: 23189281.
21. Anitua E, Orive G, Aguirre JJ, Andía I. Five-year clinical evaluation of short dental implants placed in posterior areas: a retrospective study. J Periodontol. 2008; 79:42–48. PMID: 18166091.
Article
22. Anitua E, Orive G. Short implants in maxillae and mandibles: a retrospective study with 1 to 8 years of follow-up. J Periodontol. 2010; 81:819–826. PMID: 20450361.
Article
23. Kotsovilis S, Fourmousis I, Karoussis IK, Bamia C. A systematic review and meta-analysis on the effect of implant length on the survival of rough-surface dental implants. J Periodontol. 2009; 80:1700–1718. PMID: 19905941.
Article
24. Hagi D, Deporter DA, Pilliar RM, Arenovich T. A targeted review of study outcomes with short (< or = 7 mm) endosseous dental implants placed in partially edentulous patients. J Periodontol. 2004; 75:798–804. PMID: 15295944.
25. Menchero-Cantalejo E, Barona-Dorado C, Cantero-Álvarez M, Fernández-Cáliz F, Martínez-González JM. Meta-analysis on the survival of short implants. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2011; 16:e546–e551. PMID: 21196883.
Article
26. Ketabi M, Farkhani N, Amini S. Comparing the implant stability and radiographic crestal bone loss between HA/coated and RBM short Dentis implants in posterior maxilla. J Res Dent Sci. 2014; 11:54–59.
27. Peng W, Kim IK, Cho HY, Pae SP, Jung BS, Cho HW, et al. Assessment of the autogenous bone graft for sinus elevation. J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 39:274–282. PMID: 24516817.
Article
28. Nedir R, Nurdin N, Khoury P, El Hage M, Abi Najm S, Bischof M. Paradigm shift in the management of the atrophic posterior maxilla. Case Rep Dent. 2014; 2014:486949. PMID: 25431689.
Article
29. Barone A, Orlando B, Tonelli P, Covani U. Survival rate for implants placed in the posterior maxilla with and without sinus augmentation: a comparative cohort study. J Periodontol. 2011; 82:219–226. PMID: 20831372.
Article
30. Esposito M, Grusovin MG, Rees J, Karasoulos D, Felice P, Alissa R, et al. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: augmentation procedures of the maxillary sinus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (3):CD008397. PMID: 20238367.
Article
31. Corbella S, Taschieri S, Del Fabbro M. Long-term outcomes for the treatment of atrophic posterior maxilla: a systematic review of literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17:120–132. PMID: 23656352.
Article
32. Thoma DS, Zeltner M, Hüsler J, Hämmerle CH, Jung RE. EAO Supplement Working Group 4--EAO CC 2015 Short implants versus sinus lifting with longer implants to restore the posterior maxilla: a systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015; 26(Suppl 11):154–169. PMID: 25997901.
33. Shi JY, Qiao SC, Gu YX, Zhu Y, Lai HC. Treatment strategies in moderate atrophic posterior maxilla: short dental implants or sinus floor elevation? Musculoskelet Regen. 2015; 2:e1002.
Article
34. Schincaglia GP, Thoma DS, Haas R, Tutak M, Garcia A, Taylor TD, et al. Randomized controlled multicenter study comparing short dental implants (6 mm) versus longer dental implants (11-15 mm) in combination with sinus floor elevation procedures. Part 2: clinical and radiographic outcomes at 1 year of loading. J Clin Periodontol. 2015; 42:1042–1051. PMID: 26425812.
35. Tawil G, Aboujaoude N, Younan R. Influence of prosthetic parameters on the survival and complication rates of short implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21:275–282. PMID: 16634499.
36. Karoussis IK, Salvi GE, Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Brägger U, Hämmerle CH, Lang NP. Long-term implant prognosis in patients with and without a history of chronic periodontitis: a 10-year prospective cohort study of the ITI Dental Implant System. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003; 14:329–339. PMID: 12755783.
Article
37. Albrektsson T, Zarb G, Worthington P, Eriksson AR. The long-term efficacy of currently used dental implants: a review and proposed criteria of success. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1986; 1:11–25. PMID: 3527955.
38. Birdi H, Schulte J, Kovacs A, Weed M, Chuang SK. Crown-to-implant ratios of short-length implants. J Oral Implantol. 2010; 36:425–433. PMID: 20545533.
Article
39. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997; 12:360–370. PMID: 9197101.
40. Friberg B, Gröndahl K, Lekholm U, Brånemark PI. Long-term follow-up of severely atrophic edentulous mandibles reconstructed with short Brånemark implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2000; 2:184–189. PMID: 11359277.
41. Bahat O. Brånemark system implants in the posterior maxilla: clinical study of 660 implants followed for 5 to 12 years. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000; 15:646–653. PMID: 11055131.
42. Anitua E, Piñas L, Orive G. Retrospective study of short and extra-short implants placed in posterior regions: influence of crown-to-implant ratio on marginal bone loss. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015; 17:102–110. PMID: 23656303.
Article
43. Chiapasco M, Zaniboni M, Boisco M. Augmentation procedures for the rehabilitation of deficient edentulous ridges with oral implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2006; 17(Suppl 2):136–159. PMID: 16968389.
Article
44. Donos N, Mardas N, Chadha V. Clinical outcomes of implants following lateral bone augmentation: systematic assessment of available options (barrier membranes, bone grafts, split osteotomy). J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):173–202. PMID: 18724850.
Article
45. Pjetursson BE, Tan WC, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the success of sinus floor elevation and survival of implants inserted in combination with sinus floor elevation. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):216–240. PMID: 18724852.
Article
46. Rocchietta I, Fontana F, Simion M. Clinical outcomes of vertical bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):203–215. PMID: 18724851.
Article
47. Tonetti MS, Hämmerle CH. Advances in bone augmentation to enable dental implant placement: Consensus Report of the Sixth European Workshop on Periodontology. J Clin Periodontol. 2008; 35(8 Suppl):168–172. PMID: 18724849.
Article
48. Pjetursson BE, Tan K, Lang NP, Brägger U, Egger M, Zwahlen M. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of fixed partial dentures (FPDs) after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004; 15:667–676. PMID: 15533127.
49. Wyatt CC, Zarb GA. Treatment outcomes of patients with implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1998; 13:204–211. PMID: 9581406.
50. Telleman G, Raghoebar GM, Vissink A, den Hartog L, Huddleston Slater JJ, Meijer HJ. A systematic review of the prognosis of short (<10 mm) dental implants placed in the partially edentulous patient. J Clin Periodontol. 2011; 38:667–676. PMID: 21564158.
51. Blanes RJ. To what extent does the crown-implant ratio affect the survival and complications of implant-supported reconstructions? A systematic review. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009; 20(Suppl 4):67–72.
Article
52. das Neves FD, Fones D, Bernardes SR, do Prado CJ, Neto AJ. Short implants--an analysis of longitudinal studies. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006; 21:86–93. PMID: 16519186.
Article
53. Bergkvist G, Simonsson K, Rydberg K, Johansson F, Dérand T. A finite element analysis of stress distribution in bone tissue surrounding uncoupled or splinted dental implants. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2008; 10:40–46. PMID: 18254739.
Article
54. Misch CE, Dietsh-Misch F, Hoar J, Beck G, Hazen R, Misch CM. A bone quality-based implant system: first year of prosthetic loading. J Oral Implantol. 1999; 25:185–197. PMID: 10551149.
Article
55. Tada S, Stegaroiu R, Kitamura E, Miyakawa O, Kusakari H. Influence of implant design and bone quality on stress/strain distribution in bone around implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2003; 18:357–368. PMID: 12814310.
56. Deporter D, Todescan R, Caudry S. Simplifying management of the posterior maxilla using short, porous-surfaced dental implants and simultaneous indirect sinus elevation. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000; 20:476–485. PMID: 11203585.
57. Renouard F, Nisand D. Short implants in the severely resorbed maxilla: a 2-year retrospective clinical study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2005; 7(Suppl 1):S104–S110. PMID: 16137095.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAOMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr