Yonsei Med J.  2016 Mar;57(2):313-320. 10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.313.

Role of Baroreflex Sensitivity in Predicting Tilt Training Response in Patients with Neurally Mediated Syncope

• Chun KJ
• Yim HR
• Park J
• Park SJ
• Park KM
• On YK
• Kim JS

• KMID: 2374034
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3349/ymj.2016.57.2.313

Abstract

PURPOSE
An association between baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and the response to tilt training has not been reported in patients with neurally mediated syncope (NMS). This study sought to investigate the role of BRS in predicting the response to tilt training in patients with NMS.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We analyzed 57 patients who underwent tilt training at our hospital. A responder to tilt training was defined as a patient with three consecutive negative responses to the head-up tilt test (HUT) during tilt training.
RESULTS
After tilt training, 52 patients (91.2%) achieved three consecutive negative responses to the HUT. In the supine position before upright posture during the first session of tilt training for responders and non-responders, the mean BRS was 18.17+/-10.09 ms/mm Hg and 7.99+/-5.84 ms/mm Hg (p=0.008), respectively, and the frequency of BRS > or =8.945 ms/mm Hg was 45 (86.5%) and 1 (20.0%; p=0.004), respectively. Age, male gender, frequency of syncopal events before HUT, type of NMS, phase of positive HUT, total number of tilt training sessions, and mean time of tilt training did not differ between the study groups. In the multivariate analysis, BRS <8.945 ms/mm Hg in the supine position (odds ratio 23.10; 95% CI 1.20-443.59; p=0.037) was significantly and independently associated with non-response to tilt training.
CONCLUSION
The BRS value in the supine position could be a predictor for determining the response to tilt training in patients with NMS who are being considered for inpatient tilt training.

Keyword

Baroreflex sensitivity; tilt training; neurally mediated syncope

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged
Baroreflex/*physiology
Blood Pressure
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Multivariate Analysis
Posture
Predictive Value of Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Syncope, Vasovagal/*diagnosis/*physiopathology
Tilt-Table Test/*methods
Triazoles
Triazoles

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Enrollment of patients in the study and response to tilt training. A plus sign indicates a positive response to the tilt test.

• 

  Fig. 2 BRS and hemodynamic parameters during head-up tilt test. Recordings during 5 min in the supine position immediately before upright posture (A) and during 5 min in a standing position immediately after an upright posture (B) are shown. SBP, systolic blood pressure; DBP, diastolic blood pressure; HR, heart rate; xBRS, cross-correlation baroreflex sensitivity.

• 

  Fig. 3 Methods used to compute cross-correlation BRS. (A and B) Beat to beat SBP and IBI data were fitted with cubic spline functions and resampled at 1-s intervals. (C) In 10-s windows, the correlation and regression slopes between SBP and IBI were computed. Delays of 0- to 5-s increments in IBI were computed, and the delay with the highest positive coefficient of correlation was selected; this optimal delay (Tau) was stored. (D) The slope between SBP and IBI was recorded as an xBRS estimate if the correlations was significant at p=0.01. SBP, systolic blood pressure; IBI, interbeat interval; xBRS, cross-correlation baroreflex sensitivity.

• 

  Fig. 4 Changes in responses to the tilt test before and after tilt training. This graph describes the BRS and hemodynamic parameters during the head-up tilt test in one patient (tilt training no. 134). A (first session of tilt training): Heart rate and systolic blood pressure decreased in the passive phase, and the patient lost consciousness transiently (mixed type). B (fifth session of tilt training): The patient felt mild chest discomfort; however, heat rate and blood pressure did not decrease in the passive and isoproterenol phases. HR, heart rate; xBRS, cross-correlation baroreflex sensitivity.

Reference

1. Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Syncope. European Society of Cardiology (ESC). European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Heart Failure Association (HFA). Heart Rhythm Society (HRS). Moya A, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of syncope (version 2009). Eur Heart J. 2009; 30:2631–2671.

2. Mosqueda-Garcia R, Furlan R, Tank J, Fernandez-Violante R. The elusive pathophysiology of neurally mediated syncope. Circulation. 2000; 102:2898–2906.

3. Béchir M, Binggeli C, Corti R, Chenevard R, Spieker L, Ruschitzka F, et al. Dysfunctional baroreflex regulation of sympathetic nerve activity in patients with vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 2003; 107:1620–1625.

4. Freitas J, Pereira S, Lago P, Costa O, Carvalho MJ, Falcão de Freitas A. Impaired arterial baroreceptor sensitivity before tilt-induced syncope. Europace. 1999; 1:258–265.

5. Morillo CA, Eckberg DL, Ellenbogen KA, Beightol LA, Hoag JB, Tahvanainen KU, et al. Vagal and sympathetic mechanisms in patients with orthostatic vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1997; 96:2509–2513.

6. Thomson HL, Wright K, Frenneaux M. Baroreflex sensitivity in patients with vasovagal syncope. Circulation. 1997; 95:395–400.

7. Jardine DL, Ikram H, Frampton CM, Frethey R, Bennett SI, Crozier IG. Autonomic control of vasovagal syncope. Am J Physiol. 1998; 274(6 Pt 2):H2110–H2115.

8. Samniah N, Sakaguchi S, Ermis C, Lurie KG, Benditt DG. Transient modification of baroreceptor response during tilt-induced vasovagal syncope. Europace. 2004; 6:48–54.

9. Iacoviello M, Guida P, Forleo C, Sorrentino S, D'Alonzo L, Favale S. Impaired arterial baroreflex function before nitrate-induced vasovagal syncope during head-up tilt test. Europace. 2008; 10:1170–1175.

10. el-Sayed H, Hainsworth R. Relationship between plasma volume, carotid baroreceptor sensitivity and orthostatic tolerance. Clin Sci (Lond). 1995; 88:463–470.

11. Pitzalis M, Parati G, Massari F, Guida P, Di Rienzo M, Rizzon B, et al. Enhanced reflex response to baroreceptor deactivation in subjects with tilt-induced syncope. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003; 41:1167–1173.

12. Iacoviello M, Forleo C, Guida P, Sorrentino S, D'Andria V, Rodio M, et al. Independent role of reduced arterial baroreflex sensitivity during head-up tilt testing in predicting vasovagal syncope recurrence. Europace. 2010; 12:1149–1155.

13. Jeong JO, Kim JS, Kim JK, Kwak MH, Oh JH, Lee SY, et al. Head-up tilt test in subjects with no history of syncope or presyncope. Korean Circ J. 2000; 30:841–846.

14. On YK, Park J, Huh J, Kim JS. Is home orthostatic self-training effective in preventing neurally mediated syncope. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2007; 30:638–643.

15. Imholz BP, Wieling W, van Montfrans GA, Wesseling KH. Fifteen years experience with finger arterial pressure monitoring: assessment of the technology. Cardiovasc Res. 1998; 38:605–616.

16. Gisolf J, Immink RV, van Lieshout JJ, Stok WJ, Karemaker JM. Orthostatic blood pressure control before and after spaceflight, determined by time-domain baroreflex method. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2005; 98:1682–1690.

17. Westerhof BE, Gisolf J, Stok WJ, Wesseling KH, Karemaker JM. Time-domain cross-correlation baroreflex sensitivity: performance on the EUROBAVAR data set. J Hypertens. 2004; 22:1371–1380.

18. Duygu H, Zoghi M, Turk U, Akyuz S, Ozerkan F, Akilli A, et al. The role of tilt training in preventing recurrent syncope in patients with vasovagal syncope: a prospective and randomized study. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2008; 31:592–596.

19. Gajek J, Zys´ko D, Mazurek W. Efficacy of tilt training in patients with vasovagal syncope. Kardiol Pol. 2006; 64:602–608.

20. Ector H, Willems R, Heidbüchel H, Reybrouck T. Repeated tilt testing in patients with tilt-positive neurally mediated syncope. Europace. 2005; 7:628–633.

21. Verheyden B, Ector H, Aubert AE, Reybrouck T. Tilt training increases the vasoconstrictor reserve in patients with neurally mediated syncope evoked by head-up tilt testing. Eur Heart J. 2008; 29:1523–1530.