Korean J Gastroenterol.  2015 Mar;65(3):165-172. 10.4166/kjg.2015.65.3.165.

Medical Professionalism-on Social Responsibilities Viewed from Historical Perspective

• Kim JH

• KMID: 2373202
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4166/kjg.2015.65.3.165

Abstract

What is medical professionalism and does it matter to the patients? Medical professionals take responsibility for their judgements and the consequences that ensue. Traditionally medical professionalism is defined as a set of values, behaviors, and relationships which support the trust the public has in doctors. The public is well aware that absence of professionalism is harmful to their interests. However, the exercise of medical professionalism is endangered by the political and cultural environment. The values of professionalism have been changed throughout the medical history and the meaning of it was also changed according to social theories. Traditional medical professionalism was based on the virtue of autonomy, self-regulation and competency etc. However, in the new millenium era, the meaning of professionalism has changed under the concept of responsibility which includes the classical virtues. The meaning of professionalism nowadays is only based on the structure and conflicting theories which cannot solve all the issues surrounding professionalism in medical practice. The conditions of medical practice are critical determinants for the future of professionalism. The interaction between doctor and patient is central to the medical care, and medical professionalism has roots in almost every aspect of medical care. I argue that doctors have responsibility to act according to the values which have been determined by the medical profession, history and surrounding society. The new millennium medical professionalism which based on the responsibility could initiate a public dialogue about the role of the doctor in creating a fairer society.

Keyword

Professional autonomy; Social responsibility; History of medicine

MeSH Terms

Ethics, Medical
History of Medicine
Humans
Physician-Patient Relations
*Professionalism
Social Responsibility

Reference

References

1. Green MH. Getting to the source: the case of Jacoba Felicie and the impact of the portable medieval reader on the canon of medieval women's history. Medieval Feminist Forum. 2006; 42:49–62.

2. University of Montpellier. [Internet]. University of Montpellier;2015. [cited 2015 Feb 20]. Available from:. http://en.wikipedia.org/wi-ki/University_of_Montpellier.

3. Ramsey M. Professional and popular medicine in France 1770–1830: the social world of medical practice. New York: Cambridge University Press;1988.

4. Bärnighausen T, Sauerborn R. One hundred and eighteen years of the German health insurance system: are there any lessons for middle- and low-income countries? Soc Sci Med. 2002; 54:1559–1587.

5. Krause EA. Death of the guilds: professions, states, and the ad-vance of capitalism, 1930 to the present. New Haven, London: Yale University Press;1996.

6. Parsons T. The professions and social structure. Social Forces. 1939; 17:457–467.

7. Wynia MK, Latham SR, Kao AC, Berg JW, Emanuel LL. Medical professionalism in society. N Engl J Med. 1999; 341:1612–1616.

8. Governmentality. [Internet]. Governmentality;2015. [cited 2015 Feb 20]. Available from:. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Governmentality.

9. Hamann TH. Neoliberalism, governmentality, and ethics. Foucault Stud. 2009; 6:37–59.

10. Cruess RL, Cruess SR. Expectations and obligations: professionalism and medicine's social contract with society. Perspect Biol Med. 2008; 51:579–598.

11. Irvine D. The performance of doctors: the new professionalism. Lancet. 1999; 353:1174–1177.

12. Royal College of Physicians. Doctors in society. Report of a working party: medical professionalism in a changing world. London: Royal College of Physicians of London;2005.

13. Medical Professionalism Project. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physicians' charter. Lancet. 2002; 359:520–522.

14. ABIM Foundation. American Board of Internal Medicine; ACP- ASIM Foundation. American College of Physicians-American Society of Internal Medicine; European Federation of Internal Medicine. Medical professionalism in the new millennium: a physician charter. Ann Intern Med. 2002; 136:243–246.

15. Kim MJ. H. Jonas’ philosophy of life and ‘ethics of life’. J Korean Bioethics Assoc. 2014; 15:57–71.

16. Blackmer J. Professionalism and the medical association. Ferney-Voltaire: World Medical Association;2007.

17. WMA declaration of Madrid on professionally-led regulation. [Internet]. WMA declaration of Madrid on professionally-led regulation;2009. [cited 2015 Feb 20]. Available from:. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/r4/.

18. Kuhn TS, Hacking I. The structure of scientific revolutions. 4th ed.Chicago, London: The University of Chicago Press;2012.