J Gastric Cancer.  2010 Dec;10(4):175-181.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Endoscopic Biopsy for Gastric Dysplasia

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea. dhahn@cha.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Pathogy, College of Medicine, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
There is controversy over the treatment for low grade dysplasia, while resection is recommended for high grade dysplasia. But the concordance of the grade of dysplasia between pre- and post-resection is low because of sampling errors with endoscopic biopsy. We attempted to establish a clearer direction for the treatment of dysplasia by clarifying the discrepancy between the pre- and post-resection diagnoses.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
We performed a retrospective review of 126 patients who had undergone resection with the diagnosis of dysplasia on biopsy at Bundang CHA Hospital from 1999 to 2009.
RESULTS
Seventy patients were diagnosed with low grade dysplasia and 56 patients were diagnosed with high grade dysplasia. Among the 33 patients who received gastrectomy with lymph node dissection, 30 patients were revealed to have invasive cancers and 4 patients showed lymph node metastasis. Discordance between the diagnoses from biopsy and resection occurred in 55 patients (44%). There was no correlation on the comparative analysis between the size, location or gross type of lesion and the grade of dysplasia.
CONCLUSIONS
The rate of discordance between the diagnoses of endoscopic biopsy and the post resection pathologic report was as high as 44%. Endoscopic mucosal resection was not sufficient for some patients who were diagnosed with dysplasia on biopsy due to the presence of lymph node metastasis. It is necessary to be prudent when determining the follow-up and treatment based solely on the result of the biopsy.

Keyword

Gastric epithelial dysplasia; Endoscopic biopsy; Resection; Lymph node metastasis

MeSH Terms

Biopsy
Gastrectomy
Humans
Lymph Node Excision
Lymph Nodes
Neoplasm Metastasis
Retrospective Studies
Selection Bias

Reference

1. Ming SC, Bajtai A, Correa P, Elster K, Jarvi OH, Munoz N, et al. Gastric dysplasia. Significance and pathologic criteria. Cancer. 1984. 54:1794–1801.
Article
2. Morson BC, Sobin LH, Grundmann E, Johansen A, Nagayo T, Serck-Hanssen A. Precancerous conditions and epithelial dysplasia in the stomach. J Clin Pathol. 1980. 33:711–721.
Article
3. Ghandur-Mnaymneh L, Paz J, Roldan E, Cassady J. Dysplasia of nonmetaplastic gastric mucosa. A proposal for its classification and its possible relationship to diffuse-type gastric carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 1988. 12:96–114.
4. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, Borchard F, Cooper HS, Dawsey SM, et al. The Vienna classification of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut. 2000. 47:251–255.
Article
5. Bogomoletz WV. Early gastric cancer. Am J Surg Pathol. 1984. 8:381–391.
Article
6. You WC, Blot WJ, Li JY, Chang YS, Jin ML, Kneller R, et al. Precancerous gastric lesions in a population at high risk of stomach cancer. Cancer Res. 1993. 53:1317–1321.
7. Tosi P, Filipe MI, Luzi P, Miracco C, Santopietro R, Lio R, et al. Gastric intestinal metaplasia type III cases are classified as low-category dysplasia on the basis of morphometry. J Pathol. 1993. 169:73–78.
Article
8. Choi JY, Lee SH. Therapeutic strategy and clinicopathologic analysis of gastric epithelial dysplasia. J Korean Surg Soc. 2004. 67:192–197.
9. Farinati F, Rugge M, Di Mario F, Valiante F, Baffa R. Early and advanced gastric cancer in the follow-up of moderate and severe gastric dysplasia patients. A prospective study. I.G.G.E.D.--Interdisciplinary Group on Gastric Epithelial Dysplasia. Endoscopy. 1993. 25:261–264.
Article
10. Bearzi I, Brancorsini D, Santinelli A, Rezai B, Mannello B, Ranaldi R. Gastric dysplasia: a ten-year follow-up study. Pathol Res Pract. 1994. 190:61–68.
11. Hansson LE, Lindgren A, Nyrén O. Can endoscopic biopsy specimens be used for reliable Laurén classification of gastric cancer? Scand J Gastroenterol. 1996. 31:711–715.
Article
12. Palli D, Bianchi S, Cipriani F, Duca P, Amorosi A, Avellini C, et al. Reproducibility of histologic classification of gastric cancer. Br J Cancer. 1991. 63:765–768.
Article
13. Kim YD, Cho JY, Jung IS, Koh BM, Hong SJ, Ryu CB, et al. Comparison of endoscopic forcep biopsy and the histopathologic diagnosis after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2009. 38:188–192.
14. Hwang JY, Park KS, Hwang JS, Ahn SH, Park SK. Histological comparison of endoscopic forceps biopsy with endoscopic resection in gastric mucosal elevated lesion. Korean J Gastrointest Endosc. 2003. 26:68–72.
15. Kim EY, Kim JJ, Kim B, Park SM. Treatment of gastric epithelial dysplasia that is diagnosed by endoscopic biopsy. J Korean Gastric Cancer Assoc. 2010. 10:1–4.
Article
16. Min JS, Noh SH, Kim HG, Yoo CH, Lee YC. Therapeutic strategy for gastric epithelial dysplasia. Korean J Gastroenterol. 1998. 32:176–183.
Full Text Links
  • JGC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr