Ann Occup Environ Med.  2016 ;28(1):51. 10.1186/s40557-016-0132-1.

Comparisons of hearing threshold changes in male workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss exposed to workplace noise: a retrospective cohort study for 8 years

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877 Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033 Republic of Korea. oemdoc@naver.com
  • 2Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Ulsan University Hospital, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 877, Bangeojinsunhwando-ro, Dong-gu, Ulsan, 44033 Republic of Korea.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The purpose of this study was to investigate hearing threshold changes of workers with unilateral conductive hearing loss who were exposed to workplace noise for 8-years.
METHODS
Among 1819 workers at a shipyard in Ulsan, 78 subjects with an air-bone gap ≥10 dBHL in unilateral ears were selected. Factors that could affect hearing were acquired from questionnaires, physical examinations, and biochemistry examinations. Paired t-test was conducted to compare the hearing threshold changes over time between conductive hearing loss (CHL) ear and sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) ear.
RESULTS
The study included male subjects aged 48.7"‰±"‰2.9, having worked for 29.8"‰±"‰2.7 years. Hearing thresholds increased significantly in CHL ears and SNHL ears at all frequencies (0.5-6 kHz) during follow-up period (p"‰<"‰0.05). The threshold change at 4 kHz was 3.2 dBHL higher in SNHL ears which was statistically significant (p"‰<"‰0.05). When workers were exposed to noise levels of 85 dBA and above, threshold change at 4 kHz was 5.6 dBHL higher in SNHL ears which was statistically significant (p"‰<"‰0.05). Among workers aged below 50, the threshold change values were lower in low-frequency (0.5-2 kHz) in SNHL ears, with a small range of changes, whereas in high-frequency (3-6 kHz), the range of changes was greater SNHL ears (p"‰<"‰0.05). Among workers aged 50 and above, SNHL ears showed a wider range of changes in both high- and low-frequency areas (p"‰<"‰0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
At high-frequencies, particularly at 4 kHz, the range of hearing threshold changes was lower in ears with conductive hearing loss than in contralateral ears. This is suggested as a protective effect against noise exposure.

Keyword

Keywords; Conductive hearing loss; Noise-induced hearing loss; Noise; Retrospective cohort study

MeSH Terms

Biochemistry
Cohort Studies*
Ear
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing Loss, Conductive*
Hearing Loss, Noise-Induced
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural
Hearing*
Humans
Male*
Noise*
Physical Examination
Retrospective Studies*
Ulsan
Full Text Links
  • AOEM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr