Hip Pelvis.  2016 Dec;28(4):191-200. 10.5371/hp.2016.28.4.191.

The Current Concepts of Total Hip Arthroplasty

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, CHA Bundang Medical Center, CHA University, Seongnam, Korea. drjmlee@naver.com

Abstract

No abstract available.


MeSH Terms

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip*

Reference

1. Pivec R, Johnson AJ, Mears SC, Mont MA. Hip arthroplasty. Lancet. 2012; 380:1768–1777.
Article
2. Hernigou P. Earliest times before hip arthroplasty: from John Rhea Barton to Themistocles Glück. Int Orthop. 2013; 37:2313–2318.
Article
3. Wiles P. The surgery of the osteoarthritic hip. Br J Surg. 1958; 45:488–497.
Article
4. Moore AT. The self-locking metal hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1957; 39-A:811–827.
Article
5. Thompson FR. Two and a half years' experience with a vitallium intramedullary hip prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954; 36-A:489–502.
Article
6. McKee GK, Watson-Farrar J. Replacement of arthritic hips by the McKee-Farrar prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1966; 48:245–259.
Article
7. Charnley J, Cupic Z. The nine and ten year results of the low-friction arthroplasty of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1973; (95):9–25.
Article
8. Charnley J. Anchorage of the femoral head prosthesis to the shaft of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1960; 42-B:28–30.
Article
9. Charnley J. Arthroplasty of the hip. A new operation. Lancet. 1961; 1:1129–1132.
Article
10. Berry DJ, Harmsen WS, Cabanela ME, Morrey BF. Twenty-five-year survivorship of two thousand consecutive primary Charnley total hip replacements: factors affecting survivorship of acetabular and femoral components. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2002; 84-A:171–177.
11. Callaghan JJ, Templeton JE, Liu SS, et al. Results of Charnley total hip arthroplasty at a minimum of thirty years. A concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004; 86-A:690–695.
12. Ereth MH, Weber JG, Abel MD, et al. Cemented versus noncemented total hip arthroplasty--embolism, hemodynamics, and intrapulmonary shunting. Mayo Clin Proc. 1992; 67:1066–1074.
Article
13. Parvizi J, Holiday AD, Ereth MH, Lewallen DG. The frank stinchfield award. Sudden death during primary hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1999; (369):39–48.
14. Koessler MJ, Fabiani R, Hamer H, Pitto RP. The clinical relevance of embolic events detected by transesophageal echocardiography during cemented total hip arthroplasty: a randomized clinical trial. Anesth Analg. 2001; 92:49–55.
Article
15. Jones LC, Hungerford DS. Cement disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; (225):192–206.
Article
16. Clohisy JC, Harris WH. Matched-pair analysis of cemented and cementless acetabular reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2001; 16:697–705.
Article
17. Hartofilakidis G, Georgiades G, Babis GC. A comparison of the outcome of cemented all-polyethylene and cementless metal-backed acetabular sockets in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24:217–225.
Article
18. Voigt JD, Mosier MC. Cemented all-polyethylene acetabular implants vs other forms of acetabular fixation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27:1544–1553.e10.
19. González Della Valle A, Sharrock N, Barlow M, Caceres L, Go G, Salvati EA. The modern, hybrid total hip arthroplasty for primary osteoarthritis at the Hospital for Special Surgery. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B:1 Suppl A. 54–59.
Article
20. Harris WH, Maloney WJ. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; (249):21–29.
Article
21. Berger RA, Kull LR, Rosenberg AG, Galante JO. Hybrid total hip arthroplasty: 7- to 10-year results. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; (333):134–146.
22. Lee AJ, Ling RS, Vangala SS. Some clinically relevant variables affecting the mechanical behaviour of bone cement. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1978; 92:1–18.
Article
23. Lehil MS, Bozic KJ. Trends in total hip arthroplasty implant utilization in the United States. J Arthroplasty. 2014; 29:1915–1918.
Article
24. Boyan BD, Lossdörfer S, Wang L, et al. Osteoblasts generate an osteogenic microenvironment when grown on surfaces with rough microtopographies. Eur Cell Mater. 2003; 6:22–27.
Article
25. DiFazio FA. The current status of acetabular fixation in total hip replacement. Orthop Rev. 1992; 21:1067–1071.
26. Miyakawa S, Kawamura H, Mishima H, Yasumoto J. Grit-blasted and hydroxyapatite-coated total hip arthroplasty: an 11- to 14-year follow-up study. J Orthop Sci. 2004; 9:462–467.
Article
27. Delaunay CP, Kapandji AI. Survivorship of rough-surfaced threaded acetabular cups. 382 consecutive primary Zweymüller cups followed for 0.2-12 years. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998; 69:379–383.
Article
28. Cheung KW, Yung SH, Wong KC, Chiu KH. Early failure of smooth hydroxyapatite-coated press-fit acetabular cup--7 years of follow-up. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:627–631.
29. Aldinger PR, Breusch SJ, Lukoschek M, Mau H, Ewerbeck V, Thomsen M. A ten- to 15-year follow-up of the cementless spotorno stem. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003; 85:209–214.
Article
30. Müller LA, Wenger N, Schramm M, Hohmann D, Forst R, Carl HD. Seventeen-year survival of the cementless CLS Spotorno stem. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2010; 130:269–275.
Article
31. Khanuja HS, Vakil JJ, Goddard MS, Mont MA. Cementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:500–509.
Article
32. McMinn D, Treacy R, Lin K, Pynsent P. Metal on metal surface replacement of the hip. Experience of the McMinn prothesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 329 Suppl. S89–S98.
33. Amstutz HC, Le Duff MJ. Eleven years of experience with metal-on-metal hybrid hip resurfacing: a review of 1000 conserve plus. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:6 Suppl 1. 36–43.
34. Jameson SS, Langton DJ, Natu S, Nargol TV. The influence of age and sex on early clinical results after hip resurfacing: an independent center analysis. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:6 Suppl 1. 50–55.
Article
35. Kim PR, Beaulé PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 09. 23:6 Suppl 1. 44–49.
Article
36. Willert HG, Bertram H, Buchhorn GH. Osteolysis in alloarthroplasty of the hip. The role of ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene wear particles. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (258):95–107.
37. Jacobs CA, Christensen CP, Greenwald AS, McKellop H. Clinical performance of highly cross-linked polyethylenes in total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89:2779–2786.
Article
38. Hanna SA, Somerville L, McCalden RW, Naudie DD, MacDonald SJ. Highly cross-linked polyethylene decreases the rate of revision of total hip arthroplasty compared with conventional polyethylene at 13 years' follow-up. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B:28–32.
Article
39. Kim YH, Park JW, Kulkarni SS, Kim YH. A randomised prospective evaluation of ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in the same patients with primary cementless total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop. 2013; 37:2131–2137.
Article
40. Fukui K, Kaneuji A, Sugimori T, Ichiseki T, Matsumoto T. Wear comparison between conventional and highly cross-linked polyethylene against a zirconia head: a concise follow-up, at an average 10 years, of a previous report. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28:1654–1658.
Article
41. Brown TD, Elkins JM, Pedersen DR, Callaghan JJ. Impingement and dislocation in total hip arthroplasty: mechanisms and consequences. Iowa Orthop J. 2014; 34:1–15.
42. Heiner AD, Galvin AL, Fisher J, Callaghan JJ, Brown TD. Scratching vulnerability of conventional vs highly cross-linked polyethylene liners because of large embedded third-body particles. J Arthroplasty. 2012; 27:742–749.
Article
43. Mendenhall S. Editorial--Hidden costs in cap prices. Orthop Netw News. 2015; 26:466–469.
44. Malerba G, De Santis V, Francesco B, et al. Wear in total hip arthroplasty using ceramic head: 10 years maximum FU. Bone Joint J. 2016; 98-B:Suppl 9. 9th.
45. Urban JA, Garvin KL, Boese CK, et al. Ceramic-on-polyethylene bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty. Seventeen to twenty-one-year results. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2001; 83-A:1688–1694.
46. Amstutz HC, Grigoris P. Metal on metal bearings in hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1996; 329 Suppl. S11–S34.
Article
47. Cuckler JM. The rationale for metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005; 441:132–136.
Article
48. Levy YD, Ezzet KA. Poor short term outcome with a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2013; 28:1212–1217.
Article
49. Fehring TK, Odum S, Sproul R, Weathersbee J. High frequency of adverse local tissue reactions in asymptomatic patients with metal-on-metal THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014; 472:517–522.
Article
50. Witzleb WC, Ziegler J, Krummenauer F, Neumeister V, Guenther KP. Exposure to chromium, cobalt and molybdenum from metal-on-metal total hip replacement and hip resurfacing arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2006; 77:697–705.
Article
51. de Steiger RN, Hang JR, Miller LN, Graves SE, Davidson DC. Five-year results of the ASR XL Acetabular System and the ASR Hip Resurfacing System: an analysis from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Replacement Registry. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011; 93:2287–2293.
Article
52. Smith AJ, Dieppe P, Vernon K, Porter M, Blom AW. Failure rates of stemmed metal-on-metal hip replacements: analysis of data from the National Joint Registry of England and Wales. Lancet. 2012; 379:1199–1204.
Article
53. Sedel L. Evolution of alumina-on-alumina implants: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000; (379):48–54.
54. Massin P, Lopes R, Masson B, Mainard D. Does Biolox Delta ceramic reduce the rate of component fractures in total hip replacement? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014; 100:6 Suppl. S317–S321.
Article
55. Migaud H, Putman S, Kern G, et al. Do the reasons for ceramic-on-ceramic revisions differ from other bearings in total hip arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016; 474:2190–2199.
Article
56. Mai K, Verioti C, Ezzet KA, Copp SN, Walker RH, Colwell CW Jr. Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:413–417.
Article
57. Keurentjes JC, Kuipers RM, Wever DJ, Schreurs BW. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008; 466:1438–1443.
Article
58. Walter WL, O'toole GC, Walter WK, Ellis A, Zicat BA. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplasty. 2007; 22:496–503.
59. Restrepo C, Matar WY, Parvizi J, Rothman RH, Hozack WJ. Natural history of squeaking after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:2340–2345.
Article
60. Seo BH, Ryu DJ, Kang JS, Moon KH. Primary total hip arthroplasty using 3rd generation ceramic-on-ceramic articulation. Hip Int. 2016; 26:468–473.
Article
61. Lee GC, Bistolfi A. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: A new standard. Semin Arthroplasty. 2015; 26:11–15.
Article
62. Kang BJ, Ha YC, Ham DW, Hwang SC, Lee YK, Koo KH. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: 14 to 16-year follow-up study. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30:411–415.
Article
63. Lee GC, Knox DE, Garino JP. Long-term results of hybrid alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: 10-14-year results. Semin Arthroplasty. 2013; 24:202–205.
Article
64. Crowninshield RD, Maloney WJ, Wentz DH, Humphrey SM, Blanchard CR. Biomechanics of large femoral heads: what they do and don't do. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004; (429):102–107.
65. Burroughs BR, Hallstrom B, Golladay GJ, Hoeffel D, Harris WH. Range of motion and stability in total hip arthroplasty with 28-, 32-, 38-, and 44-mm femoral head sizes. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:11–19.
Article
66. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N, Kahn B, Cahill J, Sculco TP. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:139–144.
67. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ, et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003; 85-A:2235–2246.
68. Wall SJ, Mears SC. Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 2008; 23:7 Suppl. 55–58.
Article
69. Kim YH. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty. 2006; 21:1092–1098.
Article
70. Reininga IH, Zijlstra W, Wagenmakers R, et al. Minimally invasive and computer-navigated total hip arthroplasty: a qualitative and systematic review of the literature. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2010; 11:92.
Article
71. Sugano N. Computer-assisted orthopedic surgery. J Orthop Sci. 2003; 8:442–448.
Article
72. Wixson RL, MacDonald MA. Total hip arthroplasty through a minimal posterior approach using imageless computer-assisted hip navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2005; 20:7 Suppl 3. 51–56.
Article
73. DiGioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ, Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty. 2003; 18:123–128.
Article
74. Adili A. Robot-assisted orthopedic surgery. Semin Laparosc Surg. 2004; 11:89–98.
Article
Full Text Links
  • HP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr