J Korean Med Sci.  2016 Mar;31(3):435-442. 10.3346/jkms.2016.31.3.435.

Simplified Radiographic Damage Index for Affected Joints in Chronic Gouty Arthritis

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 2Department of Radiology, Fatima Hospital, Daegu, Korea.
  • 3Department of Preventive Medicine, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea.
  • 4Division of Rheumatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Arthritis & Autoimmunity Research Center, Catholic University of Daegu School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. kimsk714@cu.ac.kr

Abstract

The aim of this study was to develop and validate a new radiographic damage scoring method (DAmagE index of GoUt; DAEGU) in chronic gout using plain radiography. Two independent observers scored foot x-rays from 15 patients with chronic gout according to the DAEGU method and the modified Sharp/van der Heijde (SvdH) method. The 10 metatarsophalangeal (MTP) and 2 interphalangeal (IP) joints of the first toes of both feet were scored to assess the degrees of erosion and joint space narrowing (JSN). The intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were analyzed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and minimal detectable change (MDC). The correlation between the DAEGU and SvdH methods was analyzed by calculating the Spearman's rho correlation coefficients and Kappa coefficients. The DAEGU method was found to be highly reproducible (0.945-0.987 for the intraobserver and 0.993-0.996 for the interobserver ICC values). The erosion, JSN, and total scores exhibited strong positive correlations between the DAEGU and SvdH methods and also within each method (r = 0.860-0.969, P < 0.001 for all parameters). The DAEGU and SvdH methods were in very good agreement as determined by Kappa coefficient analysis [0.732 (0.387-1.000) for erosion and 1.000 (1.000-1.000) for JSN]. In conclusion, this study revealed that DAEGU method was a reliable and feasible tool in the assessment of radiographic damage in chronic gout. The DAEGU method may provide a more easy assessment of structural damage in chronic gout in the real clinical practice.

Keyword

Gout; Radiography; Bone Erosion; Reliability

MeSH Terms

Adult
Arthritis, Gouty/*diagnostic imaging/pathology
Chronic Disease
Female
Humans
Joints/*diagnostic imaging/pathology
Male
Middle Aged
Severity of Illness Index
*Tomography, X-Ray Computed

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Radiographic scores for each joint change by DAEGU method. (A) Bone erosion, (B) joint space narrowing, (C) individual examples at affected joints in chronic gout patients. Black areas at periarticular and intraarticular structures indicate bone erosion.

  • Fig. 2 Spearman's correlation analysis for median values of bone erosion and joint space narrowing calculated by two radiologists within and between SvdH and DAEGU scoring methods.


Reference

1. Choi HK, Mount DB, Reginato AM; American College of Physicians; American Physiological Society. Pathogenesis of gout. Ann Intern Med. 2005; 143:499–516.
2. Bloch C, Hermann G, Yu TF. A radiologic reevaluation of gout: a study of 2,000 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1980; 134:781–787.
3. Dalbeth N, Collis J, Gregory K, Clark B, Robinson E, McQueen FM. Tophaceous joint disease strongly predicts hand function in patients with gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2007; 46:1804–1807.
4. Dalbeth N, Clark B, Gregory K, Gamble G, Sheehan T, Doyle A, McQueen FM. Mechanisms of bone erosion in gout: a quantitative analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009; 68:1290–1295.
5. Dalbeth N, Aati O, Kalluru R, Gamble GD, Horne A, Doyle AJ, McQueen FM. Relationship between structural joint damage and urate deposition in gout: a plain radiography and dual-energy CT study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2015; 74:1030–1036.
6. Kavanaugh A, Han C, Bala M. Functional status and radiographic joint damage are associated with health economic outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2004; 31:849–855.
7. Gladman DD, Farewell VT, Wong K, Husted J. Mortality studies in psoriatic arthritis: results from a single outpatient center. II. Prognostic indicators for death. Arthritis Rheum. 1998; 41:1103–1110.
8. Shi D, Xu JX, Wu HX, Wang Y, Zhou QJ, Yu RS. Methods of assessment of tophus and bone erosions in gout using dual-energy CT: reproducibility analysis. Clin Rheumatol. 2015; 34:755–765.
9. McQueen FM, Doyle A, Reeves Q, Gao A, Tsai A, Gamble GD, Curteis B, Williams M, Dalbeth N. Bone erosions in patients with chronic gouty arthropathy are associated with tophi but not bone oedema or synovitis: new insights from a 3 T MRI study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014; 53:95–103.
10. van der Heijde D. How to read radiographs according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. J Rheumatol. 2000; 27:261–263.
11. Dalbeth N, Clark B, McQueen F, Doyle A, Taylor W. Validation of a radiographic damage index in chronic gout. Arthritis Rheum. 2007; 57:1067–1073.
12. Dalbeth N, Doyle A, Boyer L, Rome K, Survepalli D, Sanders A, Sheehan T, Lobo M, Gamble G, McQueen FM. Development of a computed tomography method of scoring bone erosion in patients with gout: validation and clinical implications. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011; 50:410–416.
13. Conaghan P, Bird P, Ejbjerg B, O’Connor P, Peterfy C, McQueen F, Lassere M, Emery P, Shnier R, Edmonds J, et al. The EULAR-OMERACT rheumatoid arthritis MRI reference image atlas: the metacarpophalangeal joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005; 64:Suppl 1. i11–i21.
14. Wallace SL, Robinson H, Masi AT, Decker JL, McCarty DJ, Yü TF. Preliminary criteria for the classification of the acute arthritis of primary gout. Arthritis Rheum. 1977; 20:895–900.
15. Shrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull. 1979; 86:420–428.
16. Hallgren KA. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012; 8:23–34.
17. Lu WS, Wang CH, Lin JH, Sheu CF, Hsieh CL. The minimal detectable change of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement measure. J Rehabil Med. 2008; 40:615–619.
18. Zhu Y, Pandya BJ, Choi HK. Prevalence of gout and hyperuricemia in the US general population: the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2007-2008. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63:3136–3141.
19. Dalbeth N, Doyle AJ. Imaging of gout: an overview. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012; 26:823–838.
20. Dalbeth N, Smith T, Nicolson B, Clark B, Callon K, Naot D, Haskard DO, McQueen FM, Reid IR, Cornish J. Enhanced osteoclastogenesis in patients with tophaceous gout: urate crystals promote osteoclast development through interactions with stromal cells. Arthritis Rheum. 2008; 58:1854–1865.
21. Lee SJ, Nam KI, Jin HM, Cho YN, Lee SE, Kim TJ, Lee SS, Kee SJ, Lee KB, Kim N, et al. Bone destruction by receptor activator of nuclear factor κB ligand-expressing T cells in chronic gouty arthritis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011; 13:R164.
22. Dalbeth N, Pool B, Gamble GD, Smith T, Callon KE, McQueen FM, Cornish J. Cellular characterization of the gouty tophus: a quantitative analysis. Arthritis Rheum. 2010; 62:1549–1556.
23. Muehleman C, Li J, Aigner T, Rappoport L, Mattson E, Hirschmugl C, Masuda K, Rosenthal AK. Association between crystals and cartilage degeneration in the ankle. J Rheumatol. 2008; 35:1108–1117.
24. Pascual E, Ordóñez S. Orderly arrayed deposit of urate crystals in gout suggest epitaxial formation. Ann Rheum Dis. 1998; 57:255.
25. Dalbeth N, Milligan A, Doyle AJ, Clark B, McQueen FM. Characterization of new bone formation in gout: a quantitative site-by-site analysis using plain radiography and computed tomography. Arthritis Res Ther. 2012; 14:R165.
26. Roddy E. Revisiting the pathogenesis of podagra: why does gout target the foot? J Foot Ankle Res. 2011; 4:13.
27. Kim SK, Lee H, Kim JH, Park SH, Lee SK, Choe JY. Potential interest of dual-energy computed tomography in gout: focus on anatomical distribution and clinical association. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013; 52:402–403.
Full Text Links
  • JKMS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr