Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol.
2016 Dec;9(4):385-385. 10.21053/ceo.2016.01018.
In Reply: Dominance of Ossicular Route in Sound Transmission
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. junlee@snu.ac.kr
- KMID: 2360773
- DOI: http://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2016.01018
Abstract
- No abstract available.
Reference
-
1. Anthony WP, Harrison CW. Tympanic membrane perforation: effect on audiogram. Arch Otolaryngol. 1972; Jun. 95(6):506–10.
Article2. Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. How do tympanic-membrane perforations affect human middle-ear sound transmission? Acta Otolaryngol. 2001; Jan. 121(2):169–73.3. Voss SE, Rosowski JJ, Merchant SN, Peake WT. Non-ossicular signal transmission in human middle ears: experimental assessment of the “acoustic route” with perforated tympanic membranes. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007; Oct. 122(4):2135–53.
Article
- Full Text Links
-
- Actions
-
Cited
- CITED
-
- Close
- Share
-
- Similar articles
-
- The Dominance of Ossicular Route in Sound Transmission
- Two Cases of Multiple Ossicular Chain Disruption After Penetrating Injury and Tympanic Membrane Healing
- Time Trends in the Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori Infection and Future Directions in Korea
- Intrafamilial Transmission of Hepatitis C Virus: The Impartant Role of Infection between Spouses
- Postpartum Transmission as a Major Route of Mother-to-Child Helicobacter felis Infection
