Clin Orthop Surg.  2015 Dec;7(4):436-442. 10.4055/cios.2015.7.4.436.

Calcar Preservation Arthroplasty for Unstable Intertrochanteric Femoral Fractures in Elderly

Affiliations
  • 1Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Private Ortopedia Hospital, Adana, Turkey. mstfceliktas@yahoo.com
  • 2Orthopaedics and Traumatology Department, Antalya Training and Research Hospital, Antalya, Turkey.

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly is still controversial. The purpose of this study is to present treatment strategies for unstable intertrochanteric fractures with hemiarthroplasty using standard uncemented collared femoral stems and at the same time preserving the fractured calcar fragment.
METHODS
Fifty-four patients aged 75 years or older with unstable intertrochanteric fractures were included in this prospective cohort study. All patients were treated with calcar preserving hemiarthroplasty using cementless collored femoral stems. Fractured calcar fragment was stabilized either by compaction between the implant and femur or fixed with cable grip system. Follow-up evaluations were performed at least 24 months and later. Palmer and Parker mobility score and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score were assessed. We also analyzed radiographs of the operated hip at each follow-up visit.
RESULTS
The patients were 15 males and 39 females with a mean age of 81.3 years (range, 75 to 93 years). The average operative time was 86.6 minutes. The mean transfused blood units were 1.2 units. The average duration of hospital stay was 5.3 days. The preoperative mean mobility score was 6.20. This score was found to be 4.96 on postoperative third day and 5.90 at 24 months postoperatively. The results of the statistical analysis revealed significant increase in the mobility scores at each follow-up after three days. Radiological interpretation revealed no loosening in the cable-grip systems, and no significant subsidence (> 5 mm) of prosthesis was observed.
CONCLUSIONS
Calcar preservation arthroplasty is a good option for elderly patients with severe osteoporosis, frail constitution and the patients who are at higher risk for second operation due to unstable intertrochanteric fractures.

Keyword

Hemiarthroplasty; Hip fractures; Weight-bearing

MeSH Terms

Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects/*methods
Female
Femur/pathology/radiography/surgery
Hemiarthroplasty/adverse effects/*methods
Hip/pathology/radiography/surgery
Hip Fractures/physiopathology/radiography/*surgery
Humans
Male
Pain Measurement
Postoperative Complications
Prospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Pre- and postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of a 77-year-old female patient. (A) Preoperative radiograph of an unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the right hip with classification of AO/OTA type 31-A2. (B) Immediate postoperative radiograph. Calcar regional stability was achieved by compaction between the implant and femur without the need for extra fixation of the neck and trochanter minor. (C) Postoperative 4 months radiograph. There is trochanteric lysis due to distal press fit manner. (D) Postoperative 36 months radiograph showing well-fixed prosthesis and integrated trochanter minor and major.

  • Fig. 2 Pre- and postoperative anteroposterior radiographs of an 86-year-old female patient. (A) Preoperative radiograph showing an unstable intertrochanteric fracture of the left hip with classification of AO/OTA type 31-A3. (B) Immediate postoperative radiograph. After the prosthesis was inserted in a distal press-fit manner, trochanteric regional stability was achieved by binding both the trochanter major and minor. (C) Postoperative 24 months radiograph showing well-fixed prosthesis.


Cited by  3 articles

Fixation of Trochanteric Fragments in Cementless Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fracture: Cerclage Wiring
Young-Kyun Lee, Chan Ho Park, Kyung-Hoi Koo
Hip Pelvis. 2017;29(4):262-269.    doi: 10.5371/hp.2017.29.4.262.

Comparison between Cementless and Cemented Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty for Treatment of Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Jun-Il Yoo, Yong-Han Cha, Kap-Jung Kim, Ha-Yong Kim, Won-Sik Choy, Sun-Chul Hwang
Hip Pelvis. 2018;30(4):241-253.    doi: 10.5371/hp.2018.30.4.241.

Selecting Arthroplasty Fixation Approach Based on Greater Trochanter Fracture Type in Unstable Intertrochanteric Fractures
Min-Wook Kim, Young-Yool Chung, Sung-an Lim, Seung-Woo Shim
Hip Pelvis. 2019;31(3):144-149.    doi: 10.5371/hp.2019.31.3.144.


Reference

1. Dharmarajan TS, Banik P. Hip fracture: risk factors, preoperative assessment, and postoperative management. Postgrad Med. 2006; 119(1):31–38.
2. Liporace FA, Egol K, Koval KJ. Operative treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: an overview of modern advances and techniques. Oper Tech Orthop. 2002; 12(2):83–91.
Article
3. Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD. Intertrochanteric fractures. In : Bucholz RW, Heckman JD, editors. Rockwood and Green's fractures in adults. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins;2001. p. 1635–1663.
4. Lu-Yao GL, Baron JA, Barrett JA, Fisher ES. Treatment and survival among elderly Americans with hip fractures: a population-based study. Am J Public Health. 1994; 84(8):1287–1291.
Article
5. Kayali C, Agus H, Ozluk S, Sanli C. Treatment for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: internal fixation versus cone hemiarthroplasty. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2006; 14(3):240–244.
Article
6. Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK. Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures: a prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87(10):2186–2192.
Article
7. Choy WS, Ahn JH, Ko JH, Kam BS, Lee DH. Cementless bipolar hemiarthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Clin Orthop Surg. 2010; 2(4):221–226.
Article
8. Parker MJ, Palmer CR. A new mobility score for predicting mortality after hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1993; 75(5):797–798.
Article
9. Lichtblau S. The unstable intertrochanteric hip fracture. Orthopedics. 2008; 31(8):792–797.
Article
10. Den Hartog BD, Bartal E, Cooke F. Treatment of the unstable intertrochanteric fracture: effect of the placement of the screw, its angle of insertion, and osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1991; 73(5):726–733.
Article
11. Larsson S, Friberg S, Hansson LI. Trochanteric fractures: influence of reduction and implant position on impaction and complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990; (259):130–139.
12. Baumgaertner MR, Curtin SL, Lindskog DM, Keggi JM. The value of the tip-apex distance in predicting failure of fixation of peritrochanteric fractures of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77(7):1058–1064.
Article
13. Bendo JA, Weiner LS, Strauss E, Yang E. Collapse of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed with sliding screws. Orthop Rev. 1994; Suppl. 30–37.
14. Kyle RF, Gustilo RB, Premer RF. Analysis of six hundred and twenty-two intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1979; 61(2):216–221.
Article
15. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma. 2001; 15(6):394–400.
Article
16. Fritz T, Hiersemann K, Krieglstein C, Friedl W. Prospective randomized comparison of gliding nail and gamma nail in the therapy of trochanteric fractures. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119(1-2):1–6.
Article
17. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (9):CD000093.
Article
18. Leung KS, So WS, Shen WY, Hui PW. Gamma nails and dynamic hip screws for peritrochanteric fractures: a randomised prospective study in elderly patients. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992; 74(3):345–351.
Article
19. Suriyajakyuthana W. Intertrochanteric fractures of the femur: results of treatment with 95 degrees Condylar Blade Plate. J Med Assoc Thai. 2004; 87(12):1431–1438.
20. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, De Boeck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients: primary bipolar arthroplasty compared with internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1989; 71(8):1214–1225.
Article
21. Andress HJ, Kahl S, Kranz C, Gierer P, Schurmann M, Lob G. Clinical and finite element analysis of a modular femoral prosthesis consisting of a head and stem component in the treatment of pertrochanteric fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000; 14(8):546–553.
Article
22. Sidhu AS, Singh AP, Singh AP, Singh S. Total hip replacement as primary treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Int Orthop. 2010; 34(6):789–792.
Article
23. Liu XZ, Yang W, Yang SH, Xu WH, Ye SN. Total hip arthroplasty for treatment of elderly patients with comminuted intertrochanteric fracture accompanied by femoral head necrosis. Chin J Traumatol. 2008; 11(6):359–363.
Article
24. Fan L, Dang X, Wang K. Comparison between bipolar hemiarthroplasty and total hip arthroplasty for unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly osteoporotic patients. PLoS One. 2012; 7(6):e39531.
Article
25. Geiger F, Zimmermann-Stenzel M, Heisel C, Lehner B, Daecke W. Trochanteric fractures in the elderly: the influence of primary hip arthroplasty on 1-year mortality. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007; 127(10):959–966.
Article
26. Sancheti Kh, Sancheti P, Shyam A, Patil S, Dhariwal Q, Joshi R. Primary hemiarthroplasty for unstable osteoporotic intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: a retrospective case series. Indian J Orthop. 2010; 44(4):428–434.
Article
27. Bao NR, Zhao JN, Zhou LW, Zeng XF, Guo T. Complications of bipolar hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly. Zhongguo Gu Shang. 2010; 23(5):329–331.
28. Jones HW, Johnston P, Parker M. Are short femoral nails superior to the sliding hip screw? A meta-analysis of 24 studies involving 3,279 fractures. Int Orthop. 2006; 30(2):69–78.
Article
Full Text Links
  • CIOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr