Anesth Pain Med.  2016 Apr;11(2):190-194. 10.17085/apm.2016.11.2.190.

Comparison of spinal anesthesia between the non-elderly and elderly patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Dong-A University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea. cjchung@dau.ac.kr

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The clinical features of spinal anesthesia may differ between young and old patients because of the anatomical and physiological changes that occur with an increase in age. This study was performed retrospectively to compare the clinical aspects of spinal anesthesia between the non-elderly and elderly patients.
METHODS
We investigated the medical records of 1,180 adult patients who received spinal anesthesia during a one-year period. They were divided into two groups on the basis of 65 years of age; the non-elderly patient group (Y group, n = 813) versus the elderly patient group (E group, n = 367). Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data related to spinal anesthesia were collected. The data about satisfaction and causes of dissatisfaction with the procedure were evaluated.
RESULTS
There were significant differences between the two groups in terms of age, height, and weight, except for sex. Significantly more than two attempts at spinal puncture were performed in the E group (37.6%) than in the Y group (21.4%). There were no statistically significant differences in perioperative complications after spinal anesthesia between the two groups. There were no significant differences in the reported causes of dissatisfaction between the two groups. The rate of wanting to undergo spinal anesthesia in the future was 96.4% in the Y group and 97.5% in the E group, which showed no statistically significant difference.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the elderly patients had to undergo more spinal puncture attempts, more than 90% of the elderly patients were satisfied with spinal anesthesia and wanted to undergo spinal anesthesia again for similar surgeries in the future.

Keyword

Elderly patient; Spinal anesthesia

MeSH Terms

Adult
Aged*
Anesthesia, Spinal*
Humans
Medical Records
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Puncture

Reference

1. KOSIS: Korean Statistical Information Service [Internet]. Daejeon (KR): Statistics Korea;. 2011; cited 2015 May 1. Available from: http://www.index.go.kr/potal/main/EachDtlPageDetail.do?idx_cd=1010.
2. John FB, David CM, John DW. Morgan & Mikhail’s Clinical Anesthesiology. 2013. 5th ed. Ohio: McGraw-Hill;p. 938–9.
3. Jin F, Chung F. Minimizing perioperative adverse events in the elderly. Br J Anaesth. 2001; 87:608–24. DOI: 10.1093/bja/87.4.608. PMID: 11878732.
Article
4. Severn A. Anaesthesia and the preparation and management of elderly patients undergoing surgery. Eur J Cancer. 2007; 43:2231–4. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2007.08.013. PMID: 17904356.
Article
5. Lee GY, Han JI, Lee CH. Spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine in elderly patients: influence of aging on spread of analgesia and blood pressure. Korean J Anesthesiol. 1999; 37:436–41. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.1999.37.3.436.
6. Videman T, Battié MC, Gibbons LE, Gill K. Aging changes in lumbar discs and vertebrae and their interaction: a 15-year follow-up study. Spine J. 2014; 14:469–78. DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.11.018. PMID: 24262855.
Article
7. Prescher A. Anatomy and pathology of the aging spine. Eur J Radiol. 1998; 27:181–95. DOI: 10.1016/S0720-048X(97)00165-4.
Article
8. Boon JM, Prinsloo E, Raath RP. A paramedian approach for epidural block: an anatomic and radiologic description. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2003; 28:221–7. DOI: 10.1053/rapm.2003.50129. PMID: 12772140.
Article
9. Jeon SB, Ham TI, Kang MS, Shim HY, Park SL. Spinal subarachnoid hematoma after spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2013; 64:388–9. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2013.64.4.388. PMID: 23646256. PMCID: PMC3640179.
Article
10. Hasuwa K, Nakahashi K, Kuzumoto N, Iwata T, Inoue S, Furuya H. Spinal epidural hematoma after spinal anesthesia using a 27-gauge spinal needle in a patient with normal coagulation profile. Masui. 2009; 58:456–9. PMID: 19364009.
11. Horlocker TT, McGregor DG, Matsushige DK, Schroeder DR, Besse JA. A retrospective review of 4767 consecutive spinal anesthetics: central nervous system complications. Perioperative Outcomes Group. Anesth Analg. 1997; 84:578–84. DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199703000-00021. PMID: 9052305.
12. Rabinowitz A, Bourdet B, Minville V, Chassery C, Pianezza A, Colombani A, et al. The paramedian technique: a superior initial approach to continuous spinal anesthesia in the elderly. Anesth Analg. 2007; 105:1855–7. DOI: 10.1213/01.ane.0000287655.95619.fa. PMID: 18042894.
Article
13. Ryu CG, Ryu HG, Lee CJ, Bahk JH. The effect of angle on the position of the catheter tip in paramedian approach of thoracic epidural catheterization. Anesth Pain Med. 2007; 2:262–5.
14. Kim YS, Kim DK, Lee KC, Kang PS, Woo NS, Lee YC. Study of spinal sensory block height with 0.5% heavy bupivacaine in elderly patients. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2003; 44:488–93. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2003.44.4.488.
Article
15. Kim BK, An DA. Influence of height and vertebral length on spinal anesthesia with 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine. Korean J Anesthesiol. 1998; 35:1089–94. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.1998.35.6.1089.
Article
16. Pitkänen M, Haapaniemi L, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Influence of age on spinal anaesthesia with isobaric 0.5% bupivacaine. Br J Anaesth. 1984; 56:279–84. DOI: 10.1093/bja/56.3.279. PMID: 6704278.
17. Nakasuji M, Suh SH, Nomura M, Nakamura M, Imanaka N, Tanaka M, et al. Hypotension from spinal anesthesia in patients aged greater than 80 years is due to a decrease in systemic vascular resistance. J Clin Anesth. 2012; 24:201–6. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2011.07.014. PMID: 22537572.
Article
18. Kyokong O, Charuluxananan S, Sriprajittichai P, Poomseetong T, Naksin P. The incidence and risk factors of hypotension and bradycardia associated with spinal anesthesia. J Med Assoc Thai. 2006; 89(Suppl 3):S58–64. PMID: 17718270.
19. Lien WH, Chou MY, Liang CK, Liu K, Cho YM. Being older as a risk factor for vomiting in those undergoing spinal anesthesia. J Clin Gerontol Geriatr. 2012; 3:68–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcgg.2012.04.006.
20. Turnbull DK, Shepherd DB. Post-dural puncture headache: pathogenesis, prevention and treatment. Br J Anaesth. 2003; 91:718–29. DOI: 10.1093/bja/aeg231.
Article
21. Wadud R, Laiq N, Qureshi FA, Jan AS. The frequency of postdural puncture headache in different age groups. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2006; 16:389–92. PMID: 16787613.
22. Rhee WJ, Chung CJ, Lim YH, Lee KH, Lee SC. Factors in patient dissatisfaction and refusal regarding spinal anesthesia. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2010; 59:260–4. DOI: 10.4097/kjae.2010.59.4.260. PMID: 21057616. PMCID: PMC2966707.
Article
Full Text Links
  • APM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr