J Korean Med Assoc.  2016 Nov;59(11):888-895. 10.5124/jkma.2016.59.11.888.

Current status of health services research in primary care in Korea

• Lee HY
• Park JH
• Choi YJ

• KMID: 2358437
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2016.59.11.888

Abstract

Primary care is a key component of a health care system and many countries have been making efforts to strengthen their primary care. We aimed to outline the status of health service research on primary care in Korea. In Medline and nine Korean databases, we searched the original articles published in peer-reviewed journals through December 2015, and summarized and classified the articles. Their publication year, journal name, research methods and research topics were presented. The main categories of research topics were health care delivery, utilization, quality, workforce, resources, financing, and others. The total number of research papers was 297, and these were mainly published in domestic Korean journals (92.6%). The most frequently adopted research methods were quantitative ones, and various types of data were used. The most two common topics were health care delivery and quality of care. Diversity of data sources, lack of public research funding and low participation of primary care physicians were also found. A clarification of the scope of health services research and refinement of topic classification will be beneficial. In short, this study provides a basis for building a primary care health services research database and can be used as a data source for subsequent research. It is also necessary to set research priorities for the development and evaluation of primary care policy.

Keyword

Primary health care; Health services research; Health policy; Review

MeSH Terms

Classification
Delivery of Health Care
Financial Management
Health Policy
Health Services Research*
Health Services*
Humans
Information Storage and Retrieval
Korea*
Physicians, Primary Care
Primary Health Care*
Publications

Figure

• 

  Figure 1 Selection process of health services research in primary care.

• 

  Figure 2 Number of health services research in primary care by year.

Reference

1. Starfield B, editor. Primary care: balancing health needs, services, and technology. New York: Oxford University Press;1998.

2. World Health Organization. The world health report 2008: primary health care–now more than ever. Geneva: World Health Organization;2008.

3. Choi YJ, Ko BS, Cho KH, Lee JH. Concept, values, current status and prospect of primary care in Korea. J Korean Med Assoc. 2013; 56:856–865.

4. Saltman RB, Rico A, Boerma W. Primary care in the driver's seat? Organizational reform in European primary care. Maidenhead: Open University Press;2006.

5. Willcox S, Lewis G, Burgers J. Strengthening primary care: recent reforms and achievements in Australia, England, and the Netherlands. Issue Brief (Commonw Fund). 2011; 27:1–19.

6. Ham C, Hunter DJ, Robinson R. Evidence based policymak-ing. BMJ. 1995; 310:71–72.

7. Kim CY. Health systems research. In : Shin YS, Ahn YO, editors. Research methodology in medicine. Seoul: Seoul National University Press;1997. p. 282–297.

8. Lohr KN, Steinwachs DM. Health services research: an evolving definition of the field. Health Serv Res. 2002; 37:7–9.

9. Kim SY, Choi MY, Shin SS, Ji SM, Park JJ, Yoo JH, Lyu DH, Park SH. NECA's handbook for clinical practice guideline developer. Seoul: National Evidence-based Healthcare Collaborating Agency;2015.

10. Higgins JP, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [Internet]. [place unknown]: Cochrane Collaboration;2011. cited 2016 Aug 30. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org.

11. Kleczkowski BM, Roemer MI, Van Der Werff A. National health systems and their reorientation towards health for all: guidance for policy-making. Geneva: World Health Organization;1984.

12. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. PLoS Med. 2009; 6:e1000097.

13. Choi YJ. A study on recent trends of health services research in Korea. Health Policy Manag. 2001; 11:129–152.

14. Choi YJ, Lee TJ, Lee EK, Kim Y. Current status of cost-effectiveness analysis of pharmaceuticals in Korea. Korean Health Econ Rev. 2003; 9:59–78.

15. Lee KS, Brouwer WB, Lee SI, Koo HW. Critical review of health care economic evaluation methodology: with a special reference to study design and cost estimation. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2004; 14:58–77.

16. Son KB, Lee TJ. Review of pharmaceutical economic evaluation studies in Korea. J Health Technol Assess. 2014; 2:83–92.

17. Jeon JK, Lee J, Lee DR. Comparison of research trends in Korean and international family medicine in journals of family medicine. Korean J Fam Med. 2014; 35:265–275.

18. Thomas T, Fahey T, Somerset M. The content and methodology of research papers published in three United Kingdom primary care journals. Br J Gen Pract. 1998; 48:1229–1232.

19. Crabtree BF, Miller WL. Doing qualitative research. 2nd ed. London: Sage Publications;1999.

20. Kim CB, Lee SY. Trends and its policy implications of copayment system on office-based medical care during the last decade in Korea. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2001; 11:1–20.

21. Chung SH, Park EC, Jeong HS. Influence of review system using computerized program for acute respiratory infection upon practicing doctors' behaviour. Korean J Health Policy Adm. 2006; 16:49–76.

22. Chae JM, Lee SO, Kim DS, Song HJ, Jang S. Prescribing incentive scheme demonstration project and efforts to reduce pharmaceutical cost: qualitative and quantitative mixed method. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2013; 19:79–98.

23. Han E, Chae SM, Kim NS, Park S. Effects of pharmaceutical cost containment policies on doctors' prescribing behavior: focus on antibiotics. Health Policy. 2015; 119:1245–1254.

24. Cho JJ, Kwon YJ, Jung SH. Community based health care service design on chronic disease for enhancing primary care and the status of community based primary care project. Korean J Family Pract. 2015; 5:173–178.

25. Cho JJ. The direction of reform for enhancing primary care. J Korean Med Assoc. 2016; 59:482–485.

26. Kissick WL. Medicine's dilemmas: infinite needs versus finite resources. New Haven: Yale University Press;1994.

27. Min DK, Choi SA, Choi YH, Lee JH. Possession of a medical doctor as a usual source of care in patients with diabetes and its associated socioeconomic factors in South Korea. Korean J Fam Pract. 2015; 5:289–295.

28. Cheong C, Lee TJ. The effect of increase in coinsurance rate for tertiary hospital visits on the choice among different types of medical facilities stratified by income levels in Korea. Korean J Health Econ Policy. 2015; 21:103–124.

29. Huh BY, Cho BL, Lim JH, Doh BW, Kim HJ, Hwang HS. Building the 'private office-based research network' to activate primary care: application of the 'lifetime health monitoring program' in the office. Korean J Fam Med. 1999; 20:1661–1671.