J Korean Neurosurg Soc.  2016 Sep;59(5):492-497. 10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492.

Which One Is Better to Reduce the Infection Rate, Early or Late Cranioplasty?

• Oh JS
• Lee KS
• Shim JJ
• Yoon SM
• Doh JW
• Bae HG

• KMID: 2351718
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2016.59.5.492

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
Decompressive craniectomy is an effective therapy to relieve high intracranial pressure after acute brain damage. However, the optimal timing for cranioplasty after decompression is still controversial. Many authors reported that early cranioplasty may contribute to improve the cerebral blood flow and brain metabolism. However, despite all the advantages, there always remains a concern that early cranioplasty may increase the chance of infection. The purpose of this retrospective study is to investigate whether the early cranioplasty increase the infection rate. We also evaluated the risk factors of infection following cranioplasty.
METHODS
We retrospectively examined the results of 131 patients who underwent cranioplasty in our institution between January 2008 and June 2015. We divided them into early (≤90 days) and late (>90 days after craniectomy) groups. We examined the risk factors of infection after cranioplasty. We analyzed the infection rate between two groups.
RESULTS
There were more male patients (62%) than female (38%). The mean age was 49 years. Infection occurred in 17 patients (13%) after cranioplasty. The infection rate of early cranioplasty was lower than that of late cranioplasty (7% vs. 20%; p=0.02). Early cranioplasty, non-metal allograft materials, re-operation before cranioplasty and younger age were the significant factors in the infection rate after cranioplasty (p<0.05). Especially allograft was a significant risk factor of infection (odds ratio, 12.4; 95% confidence interval, 3.24-47.33; p<0.01). Younger age was also a significant risk factor of infection after cranioplasty by multivariable analysis (odds ratio, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.96-0.99; p=0.02).
CONCLUSION
Early cranioplasty did not increase the infection rate in this study. The use of non-metal allograft materials influenced a more important role in infection in cranioplasty. Actually, timing itself was not a significant risk factor in multivariate analysis. So the early cranioplasty may bring better outcomes in cognitive functions or wound without raising the infection rate.

Keyword

Cranioplasty; Infection; Decompressive craniectomy; Hydroxyapatities

MeSH Terms

Allografts
Brain
Cerebrovascular Circulation
Cognition
Decompression
Decompressive Craniectomy
Female
Humans
Intracranial Pressure
Male
Metabolism
Multivariate Analysis
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Wounds and Injuries

Reference

1. Açikgöz B, Ozcan OE, Erbengi A, Bertan V, Ruacan S, Açikgöz HG. Histopathologic and microdensitometric analysis of craniotomy bone flaps preserved between abdominal fat and muscle. Surg Neurol. 1986; 26:557–561. PMID: 2946089.

2. Adamo MA, Deshaies EM. Emergency decompressive craniectomy for fulminating infectious encephalitis. J Neurosurg. 2008; 108:174–176. PMID: 18173329.

3. Agner C, Dujovny M, Gaviria M. Neurocognitive assessment before and after cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2002; 144:1033–1040. discussion 1040. PMID: 12382131.

4. Bijlenga P, Zumofen D, Yilmaz H, Creisson E, de Tribolet N. Orthostatic mesodiencephalic dysfunction after decompressive craniectomy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007; 78:430–433. PMID: 17119005.

5. Blum KS, Schneider SJ, Rosenthal AD. Methyl methacrylate cranioplasty in children : long-term results. Pediatr Neurosurg. 1997; 26:33–35. PMID: 9361115.

6. Broughton E, Pobereskin L, Whitfield PC. Seven years of cranioplasty in a regional neurosurgical centre. Br J Neurosurg. 2014; 28:34–39. PMID: 23875882.

7. Chang V, Hartzfeld P, Langlois M, Mahmood A, Seyfried D. Outcomes of cranial repair after craniectomy. J Neurosurg. 2010; 112:1120–1124. PMID: 19612971.

8. Costantino PD, Chaplin JM, Wolpoe ME, Catalano PJ, Sen C, Bederson JB, et al. Applications of fast-setting hydroxyapatite cement : cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000; 123:409–412. PMID: 11020176.

9. Dujovny M, Fernandez P, Alperin N, Betz W, Misra M, Mafee M. Post-cranioplasty cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamic changes : magnetic resonance imaging quantitative analysis. Neurol Res. 1997; 19:311–316. PMID: 9192385.

10. Erman T, Demirhindi H, Göçer AI, Tuna M, Ildan F, Boyar B. Risk factors for surgical site infections in neurosurgery patients with antibiotic prophylaxis. Surg Neurol. 2005; 63:107–112. discussion 112-113. PMID: 15680644.

11. Eufinger H, Wehmöller M. Individual prefabricated titanium implants in reconstructive craniofacial surgery : clinical and technical aspects of the first 22 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998; 102:300–308. PMID: 9703063.

12. Fodstad H, Love JA, Ekstedt J, Fridén H, Liliequist B. Effect of cranioplasty on cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics in patients with the syndrome of the trephined. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1984; 70:21–30. PMID: 6741628.

13. Friedman CD, Costantino PD, Synderman CH, Chow LC, Takagi S. Reconstruction of the frontal sinus and frontofacial skeleton with hydroxyapatite cement. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2000; 2:124–129. PMID: 10925438.

14. Fu TS, Jing R, McFaull SR, Cusimano MD. Recent trends in hospitalization and in-hospital mortality associated with traumatic brain injury in Canada : a nationwide, population-based study. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015; 79:449–454. PMID: 26535433.

15. Gladstone HB, McDermott MW, Cooke DD. Implants for cranioplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 1995; 28:381–400. PMID: 7596618.

16. Im SH, Jang DK, Han YM, Kim JT, Chung DS, Park YS. Long-term incidence and predicting factors of cranioplasty infection after decompressive craniectomy. J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2012; 52:396–403. PMID: 23133731.

17. Jho DH, Neckrysh S, Hardman J, Charbel FT, Amin-Hanjani S. Ethylene oxide gas sterilization : a simple technique for storing explanted skull bone. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2007; 107:440–445. PMID: 17695404.

18. Joffe J, Harris M, Kahugu F, Nicoll S, Linney A, Richards R. A prospective study of computer-aided design and manufacture of titanium plate for cranioplasty and its clinical outcome. Br J Neurosurg. 1999; 13:576–580. PMID: 10715726.

19. Klinger DR, Madden C, Beshay J, White J, Gambrell K, Rickert K. Autologous and acrylic cranioplast : a review of 10 years and 258 cases. World Neurosurg. 2014; 82:e525–e530. PMID: 24036124.

20. Liang W, Xiaofeng Y, Weiguo L, Gang S, Xuesheng Z, Fei C, et al. Cranioplasty of large cranial defect at an early stage after decompressive craniectomy performed for severe head trauma. J Craniofac Surg. 2007; 18:526–532. PMID: 17538313.

21. Maas CS, Merwin GE, Wilson J, Frey MD, Maves MD. Comparison of biomaterials for facial bone augmentation. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1990; 116:551–556. PMID: 2158331.

22. Marchac D, Greensmith A. Long-term experience with methylmethacrylate cranioplasty in craniofacial surgery. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2008; 61:744–752. discussion 753. PMID: 18474454.

23. Matsuno A, Tanaka H, Iwamuro H, Takanashi S, Miyawaki S, Nakashima M, et al. Analyses of the factors influencing bone graft infection after delayed cranioplasty. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2006; 148:535–540. discussion 540. PMID: 16467959.

24. Moreira-Gonzalez A, Jackson IT, Miyawaki T, Barakat K, DiNick V. Clinical outcome in cranioplasty : critical review in long-term follow-up. J Craniofac Surg. 2003; 14:144–153. PMID: 12621283.

25. Sarov M, Guichard JP, Chibarro S, Guettard E, Godin O, Yelnik A, et al. Sinking skin flap syndrome and paradoxical herniation after hemicraniectomy for malignant hemispheric infarction. Stroke. 2010; 41:560–562. PMID: 20056926.

26. Schiffer J, Gur R, Nisim U, Pollak L. Symptomatic patients after craniectomy. Surg Neurol. 1997; 47:231–237. PMID: 9068692.

27. Segal DH, Oppenheim JS, Murovic JA. Neurological recovery after cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 1994; 34:729–731. discussion 731. PMID: 8008174.

28. Shoakazemi A, Flannery T, McConnell RS. Long-term outcome of subcutaneously preserved autologous cranioplasty. Neurosurgery. 2009; 65:505–510. discussion 510. PMID: 19687696.

29. Yadla S, Campbell PG, Chitale R, Maltenfort MG, Jabbour P, Sharan AD. Effect of early surgery, material, and method of flap preservation on cranioplasty infections : a systematic review. Neurosurgery. 2011; 68:1124–1129. discussion 1130. PMID: 21242830.