Neurointervention.  2016 Sep;11(2):99-104. 10.5469/neuroint.2016.11.2.99.

Comparison Between Balloon-Assisted and Stent-Assisted Technique for Treatment of Unruptured Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysms

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. bmoon21@hanmail.net
  • 2Department of Neurosurgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Severance Hospital Stroke Center, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To compare clinical and angiographic outcomes between balloon-assisted (BAC) and stent-assisted coiling for internal carotid artery unruptured aneurysms (ICA-UA).
MATERIALS AND METHODS
A total of 227 ICA-UA in 190 patients were treated with BAC (120 patients, 141 ICA-UA) or SAC (70 patients, 86 ICA-UA. We compared characteristics of patients and ICA-UA, and clinical and angiographic outcomes between groups.
RESULTS
Aneurysm size and neck diameter were greater for SAC than in BAC, but aneurysm volume and coil packing density were not different between groups. Immediate angiographic occlusion grade was better for BAC than for SAC. Periprocedural thromboembolic events were more frequent during SAC (11.6%) than BAC (2.4%) per aneurysm, but hemorrhagic events were the opposite (2.4% for BAC and none for SAC per aneurysm) (p < 0.05). At discharge, treatment-related morbi-mortality rates were 1.6% for BAC and 1.4% per patient for SAC. At clinical follow-up (BAC, 118 patients [98.3%] for a mean of 48.4 months; SAC, 69 patients [98.6%], for a mean of 37.4 months), 1 additional treatment-related infarction occurred during SAC, resulting in a modified Rankin scale score of 4. Thus, overall treatment-related morbi-mortality rates were 1.7% in BAC and 2.9% in SAC. At imaging follow-up (BAC, 135 aneurysms [95.7%] for 28.3 months; SAC, 81 aneurysms [94.1%] for 23.9 months), BAC and SAC showed stable or improved occlusion in 94.1% and 95.0%, minor recurrence in 4.4% and 2.5%, and major recurrence in 1.5% and 2.5%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
Both BAC and SAC were safe and effective techniques for ICA-UA. There were no differences in morbi-mortality and recurrence rates between groups.

Keyword

Aneurysm; Internal carotid artery; Coil embolization; Balloon; Stent

MeSH Terms

Aneurysm*
Carotid Artery, Internal*
Embolization, Therapeutic
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Infarction
Neck
Recurrence
Stents

Cited by  2 articles

A Newly-Developed Flow Diverter (FloWise) for Internal Carotid Artery Aneurysm: Results of a Pilot Clinical Study
Byung Moon Kim, Keun Young Park, Jae Whan Lee, Joonho Chung, Dong Joon Kim, Dong Ik Kim
Korean J Radiol. 2019;20(3):505-512.    doi: 10.3348/kjr.2018.0421.

Microguidewire Looping to Traverse Stented Parent Arteries of Intracranial Aneurysms
Young Dae Cho, Jong Kook Rhim, Dong Hyun Yoo, Hyun-Seung Kang, Jeong Eun Kim, Moon Hee Han
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017;60(2):262-268.    doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0707.009.


Reference

1. Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, Clarke M, Sneade M, Yarnold JA, Sandercock P. International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT) Collaborative Group. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet. 2005; 366:809–817. PMID: 16139655.
Article
2. Ryttlefors M, Enblad P, Kerr RS, Molyneux AJ. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling: subgroup analysis of 278 elderly patients. Stroke. 2008; 39:2720–2726. PMID: 18669898.
3. Lanzino G, Murad MH, d'Urso PI, Rabinstein AA. Coil embolization versus clipping for ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a meta-analysis of prospective controlled published studies. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2013; 34:1764–1768. PMID: 23578672.
Article
4. Raftopoulos C, Mathurin P, Boscherini D, Billa RF, Van Boven M, Hantson P. Prospective analysis of aneurysm treatment in a series of 103 consecutive patients when endovascular embolization is considered the first option. J Neurosurg. 2000; 93:175–182. PMID: 10930001.
Article
5. Ross IB, Dhillon GS. Balloon assistance as a routine adjunt to the endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Surg Neurol. 2006; 66:593–601. PMID: 17145318.
6. Pierot L, Spelle L, Leclerc X, Cognard C, Bonafe A, Moret J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms: comparison of safety of remodeling technique and standard treatment with coils. Radiology. 2009; 251:846–855. PMID: 19318586.
Article
7. Pierot L, Cognard C, Anxionnat R, Ricolfi F. CLARITY Investigators. Remodeling technique for endovascular treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms had a higher rate of adequate postoperative occlusion than did conventional coil embolization with comparable safety. Radiology. 2011; 258:546–553. PMID: 21131582.
Article
8. Pierot L, Cognard C, Spelle L, Moret J. Safety and efficacy of balloon remodeling technique during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: critical review of the literature. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:12–15. PMID: 21349960.
Article
9. Shapiro M, Babb J, Becske T, Nelson PK. Safety and efficacy of adjunctive balloon remodeling during endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a literature review. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008; 29:1777–1781. PMID: 18719039.
Article
10. Rho MH, Kim BM, Suh SH, Kim DJ, Kim DI. Initial experience with the new double-lumen scepter balloon catheter for treatment of wide-necked aneurysms. Korean J Radiol. 2013; 14:832–840. PMID: 24043982.
Article
11. Kim BM, Kim DJ, Kim DI. Stent application for the treatment of cerebral aneurysms. Neurointervention. 2011; 6:53–70. PMID: 22125751.
Article
12. Chalouhi N, Jabbour P, Singhal S, Drueding R, Starke RM, Dalyai RT, et al. Stent-assisted coiling of intracranial aneurysms: predictors of complications, recanalization, and outcome in 508 cases. Stroke. 2013; 44:1348–1353. PMID: 23512976.
Article
13. Jeon P, Kim BM, Kim DI, Park SI, Kim KH, Kim DJ, et al. Reconstructive endovascular treatment of fusiform or ultrawideneck circumferential aneurysms with multiple overlatpping Enterprise stents and coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2012; 33:965–971. PMID: 22268079.
14. Colby GP, Paul AR, Radvany MG, Gandhi D, Gailloud P, Huang J, et al. A single center comparison of coiling versus stent assisted coiling in 90 consecutive paraophthalmic region aneurysms. J Neurointerv Surg. 2012; 4:116–120. PMID: 21990478.
Article
15. Roy D, Milot G, Raymond J. Endovascular treatment of unruptured aneurysms. Stroke. 2001; 32:1998–2004. PMID: 11546888.
Article
16. Jeon P, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Kim DI, Suh SH. Treatment of multiple intracranial aneurysms with 1-stage coiling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014; 35:1170–1173. PMID: 24371032.
Article
17. Jeon HJ, Kim BM, Kim DJ, Park KY, Kim JW, Kim DI. Combination of multicatheter plus stent or balloon for treatment of complex aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; 37:311–316. PMID: 26381558.
Article
Full Text Links
  • NI
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr