J Korean Med Assoc.  2016 Aug;59(8):580-591. 10.5124/jkma.2016.59.8.580.

A study on the philosophical grounds of professional self-regulation

• Jeon D
• Kim Y

• KMID: 2349835
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5124/jkma.2016.59.8.580

Abstract

This article examines the nature of professional self-regulation and clarifies its basis. Traditionally, the western principle of self-regulation has been grounded in social contract theory. However, we argue here that this very analysis results in a weak moral foundation, and it often causes regulatory capture. In support of this argument, we clarify the structure of self-regulation from utilitarian and social contract theory perspectives. We show conclusively that this structure has an intimate relationship with the failure of professional self-regulation. We thus present an alternative view of the nature of self-regulation from Rawlsian theory. We maintain that genuine self-regulation of a community requires grounding not only in social contract theory, but also an appropriate moral philosophical theory.

Keyword

Self-regulation; Regulatory capture; Social contract; Rawls

MeSH Terms

Self-Control*

Reference

1. Davies M. Medical self-regulation: crisis and change. Brighton: University of Sussex;2007.

2. Choi BS. Government regulation: politics & economics of regulation and deregulation. Seoul: Bobmunsa;1992.

3. Baldwin R, Cave M. Understanding regulation: theory, strategy, and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press;1999.

4. Ogus A. Rethinking self-regulation. Oxf J Leg Stud. 1995; 15:97–108.

5. Sagong YH. Paternalistic administrative culture and the capture of regulatory bureaucrats. Korean Rev Public Adm. 1998; 32:113–129.

6. World Federation for Medical Education. The World Federation for Medical Education (WFME) task force report. Copenhagen: World Federation for Medical Education;2010.

7. Rueschemeyer D. Lawyers and their society: a comparative study of the legal profession in Germany and in the United States. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;1973.

8. Abel RL. The politics of the market for legal services. Oxford: M. Robertson;1982.

9. Disney J, Basten J, Redmond P, Ross S, Bell K. Lawyers. 2nd ed. Melbourne: Law Book;1986.

10. Hobbes T. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press;2008.

11. Locke J. Two treatises on civil government. Charleston: Nabu Press;2010.

12. Locke J. An essay concerning the true original, extent, and end of civil government. Boston: Gale ECCO;2010.

13. Rousseau J. Discourse on the origin and foundations of inequality among men. New York: Bedford/St. Martins;2010.

14. Stigler GJ. The theory of economic regulation. Bell J Econ Manag Sci. 1971; 2:3–21.

15. Rawls J. Lectures on the history of political philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;2007.

16. Gunningham N, Rees J. Industry self-regulation: an institutional perspective. Law Policy. 1997; 19:363–414.

17. Allen H. Promises. Stanford: The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy;2014.

18. Rawls J. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;1999.

19. Rawls J. Two concepts of rules. Philos Rev. 1955; 64:3–32.

20. Rawls J. Legal obligation and the duty of fair play. In : Hook S, editor. Law and philosophy. New York: New York University Press;1964.

21. Rawls J, Kelly E. Justice as fairness: a restatement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press;2001.