J Korean Acad Prosthodont.  2016 Jul;54(3):273-279. 10.4047/jkap.2016.54.3.273.

Oral rehabilitation of a patient with severely worn dentition using monolithic zirconia

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Prosthodontics, Department of Dentistry, Anam Hospital, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea. koprosth@unitel.co.kr

Abstract

Severe tooth wear may lead to pathological changes of pulp, imbalance in occlusion as well as functional and esthetic problems. In this case, 34-year-old male came to the hospital because of generally worn dentition due to attrition and erosion. After evaluation, a full mouth restoration with elevation of the vertical dimension of occlusion was planned. After occlusion was stabilized by an occlusal stabilization appliance, centric relation position was recorded and subsequent provisional restorations were fabricated. After evaluation, a CAD-CAM (computer aided design-computer aided manufacturing) prosthetic restoration was carried out using monolithic zirconia. After 12 months of follow up observation, the patient was satisfied with function and esthetic appearance.

Keyword

Oral rehabilitation; Monolithic zirconia; Bruxism; Erosion

MeSH Terms

Adult
Bruxism
Centric Relation
Computer-Aided Design
Dentition*
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Male
Mouth
Rehabilitation*
Tooth Wear
Vertical Dimension

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Initial intra-oral photographs. (A) Maxillary occlusal view, (B) Right lateral view, (C) Frontal view, (D) Left lateral view, (E) Mandibular occlusal view.

  • Fig. 2. Initial panoramic radiographic image.

  • Fig. 3. Initial TMJ series. (A) Right side on closed state, (B) Right side on opened state, (C) Left side on closed state, (D) Left side on opened state.

  • Fig. 4. Facial analysis. (A) Frontal view, (B) Lateral view.

  • Fig. 5. Diagnostic wax up. (A) Frontal view, (B) Maxillary occlusal view, (C) Mandibular occlusal view.

  • Fig. 6. Provisional restoration delivery. (A) Frontal view, (B) Maxillary occlusal view, (C) Mandibular occlusal view.

  • Fig. 7. (A) Full contour wax up on master cast. (B) Monolithic zirconia crown on master cast.

  • Fig. 8. Final prostheses with monolithic zirconia crown. (A) Maxillary occlusal view, (B) Right lateral view, (C) Frontal view, (D) Left lateral view, (E) Mandibular occlusal view.

  • Fig. 9. Analysis of smile line.


Reference

1.Young WG. The oral medicine of tooth wear. Aust Dent J. 2001. 46:236–50.
Article
2.ten Cate JM., Imfeld T. Dental erosion, summary. Eur J Oral Sci. 1996. 104:241–4.
Article
3.Khan F., Young WG., Daley TJ. Dental erosion and bruxism. A tooth wear analysis from south east Queensland. Aust Dent J. 1998. 43:117–27.
Article
4.Murphy T. Compensatory mechanisms in face height adjustment to functional tooth attrition. Aust Dent J. 2009. 4:312–23.
5.Berry DC., Poole DF. Attrition: possible mechanisms of compensation. J Oral Rehabil. 1976. 3:201–6.
Article
6.Faigenblum M. Removable prostheses. Br Dent J. 1999. 186:273–6.
Article
7.Turner KA., Missirlian DM. Restoration of the extremely worn dentition. J Prosthet Dent. 1984. 52:467–74.
Article
8.Ibbetson RJ., Setchell DJ. Treatment of the worn dentition: 2. Dent Update. 1989. 16:300–2. 305–7.
9.Ganss C., Lussi A. Diagnosis of erosive tooth wear. Monogr Oral Sci. 2006. 20:32–43.
Article
10.Khan F., Young WG., Law V., Priest J., Daley TJ. Cupped lesions of early onset dental erosion in young southeast Queensland adults. Aust Dent J. 2001. 46:100–7.
Article
11.Young WG., Khan F. Sites of dental erosion are saliva-dependent. J Oral Rehabil. 2002. 29:35–43.
Article
12.Brunton PA., McCord JF. An analysis of nasolabial angles and their relevance to tooth position in the edentulous patient. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 1993. 2:53–6.
13.Dawson PE. Functional occlusion: From TMJ to smile design. Elsevier inc.;2007. p. 430–52.
14.Abduo J., Lyons K. Clinical considerations for increasing occlusal vertical dimension: a review. Aust Dent J. 2012. 57:2–10.
Article
15.Tinschert J., Natt G., Mautsch W., Augthun M., Spiekermann H. Fracture resistance of lithium disilicate-, alumina-, and zirconia-based three-unit fixed partial dentures: a laboratory study. Int J Prosthodont. 2001. 14:231–8.
16.Christel P., Meunier A., Heller M., Torre JP., Peille CN. Mechanical properties and short-term in-vivo evaluation of yttrium-oxide-partially-stabilized zirconia. J Biomed Mater Res. 1989. 23:45–61.
17.Miyazaki T., Nakamura T., Matsumura H., Ban S., Kobayashi T. Current status of zirconia restoration. J Prosthodont Res. 2013. 57:236–61.
Article
18.Baldissara P., Llukacej A., Ciocca L., Valandro FL., Scotti R. Translucency of zirconia copings made with different CAD/CAM systems. J Prosthet Dent. 2010. 104:6–12.
Article
19.Rojas-Vizcaya F. Full zirconia fixed detachable implant-retained restorations manufactured from monolithic zirconia: clinical report after two years in service. J Prosthodont. 2011. 20:570–6.
Article
20.Limmer B., Sanders AE., Reside G., Cooper LF. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results. J Prosthodont. 2014. 23:267–75.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKAP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr