J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2013 Aug;54(8):1208-1212.

Changes in Optical Quality of Cataract Patients' Corrected Visual Acuity before and after Phacoemulsification

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Institute for Visual Science College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. ckjoo@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE
To evaluate objectively the improvement level of a patient's visual function using the NEI-VFQ-25 questionnaire pre- and post-operatively and the OQAS results from the patient group who had the same corrected visual acuity pre- and post-operatively.
METHODS
We examined and compared the NEI-VFQ-25 test, OSI, MTF cut-off, strehl ratio, OQAS, and width at 50% and 10% in 24 eyes of 24 patients who had cataract surgery between December 2011 and February 2012. The patients' corrected visual acuity in both eyes had no change (0.8 and 0.8) pre-operatively and 2 months post-operatively (1.0 and 1.0).
RESULTS
The satisfaction level regarding the patients' visual function increased. The NEI-VFQ-25 test was 71.54 +/- 14.88 points pre-operatively and 85.70 +/- 6.17 points post-operatively. OSI decreased to 3.13 +/- 1.66 (OSI value) and 1.53 +/- 0.58 (OSI value), and MTF cut off value improved from 14.51 +/- 6.97 (C/deg) to 27.63 +/- 8.98 (C/deg). Strehl ratio was improved to 0.09 +/- 0.03 and 0.14 +/- 0.03, width at 50% improved to 8.44 +/- 3.73 and 4.52 +/- 1.90 and width at 10% improved to 35.30 +/- 15.22 and 18.04 +/- 8.87 pre- and post-operatively, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS
The NEI-VFQ-25 test reflected the vision improvement in patients where after cataract surgery, determination of the visual function improvement only through vision would not be possible. In addition, the OQAS showed the quality of vision improved through quantified values.

Keyword

Cataract surgery; MTF; NEI-VFQ-25; OQAS; OSI

MeSH Terms

Cataract
Eye
Humans
Phacoemulsification
Surveys and Questionnaires
Vision, Ocular
Visual Acuity

Figure

  • Figure 1. Illustration of a double-pass system

  • Figure 2. Modulation transfer function.

  • Figure 3. A representative OQAS result of a patient.


Reference

References

1. Koch DD. Glare and contrast sensitivity testing in cataract patients. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1989; 15:158–64.
Article
2. Vilaseca M, Arjona M, Pujol J. . Optical quality of foldable monofocal intraocular lenses before and after injection aaComparative evaluation using a double-pass system. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009; 35:1415–23.
3. Benito A, Pérez GM, Mirabet S. . Objective optical assessment of tear-film quality dynamics in normal and mildly symptomatic dry eyes. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011; 37:1481–7.
Article
4. Díaz-Doutón F, Benito A, Pujol J. . Comparison of the retinal image quality with a hartmann-shack wavefront sensor and a dou-ble-pass instrument. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2006; 47:1710–6.
5. Cabot F, Saad A, McAlinden C. . Objective assessment of crystalline lens opacity level by measuring ocular light scattering with a double-pass system. Am J Ophthalmol. 2013; 155:629–635,e1-2.
Article
6. Martínez-Roda JA, Vilaseca M, Ondategui JC. . Optical qual-ity and intraocular scattering in a healthy young population. Clin Exp Optom. 2011; 94:223–9.
7. Artal P, Benito A, Pérez GM. . An objective scatter index based on double-pass retinal images of a point source to classify cataracts. PLoS One. 2011; 6:e16823.
Article
8. Heo JW, Yoon HS, Shin JP. . A validation and reliability study of the Korean version of national eye institute visual function questionnaire 25. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2010; 51:1354–67.
Article
9. Kang SM, Kang IB, Kim JH. Visual acuity prediction with the illuminated near card in cataract patients. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2006; 47:1568–74.
10. The potential role of the retinal acuity meter for predicting visual outcome after cataract surgery. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2007; 48:898–904.
11. Ahn SM, Seok SS, Park CY. Considering spherical aberration in choosing the wavefront map for laser vision correction. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2011; 52:147–56.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr