J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2007 Nov;48(11):1506-1511.

Phacoemulsification in Patients with Ahmed Glaucoma Valve Implant

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. mdahn@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effects of phacoemulsification in glaucomatous eyes with a functioning Ahmed glaucoma valve insertion.
METHODS
This retrospective analysis followed 28 eyes from 26 patients with a functioning Ahmed glaucoma valve who had clear corneal phacoemulsification from December 1999 to February 2006. Intraocular pressure (IOP), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), number of glaucoma medications and additional glaucoma surgeries were measured.
RESULTS
The mean IOP before phacoemulsification was 17.4 mmHg +/- 5.8 (SD). Postoperative IOP was 13.6 +/- 4.4 mmHg, 13.7 +/- 4.0 mmHg, 14.1 +/- 4.0 mmHg and 15.4 +/- 3.8 mmHg at 1, 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The change in the number of glaucoma medications significantly changed at 1 month (p<0.05), but did not change at 2, 6 and 12 months (p>0.05) postoperatively. The IOP significantly changed at 1 week, 1 month, 2 months, and 6 months (p<0.05), but did not significantly change at 12 months (p>0.05) postoperatively. No eyes required additional surgery. BCVA improved in 23 eyes; the mean improvement was 3.7 +/- 2.9 Snellen lines at 2 months postoperatively.
CONCLUSIONS
Phacoemulsification in glaucomatous eyes with a functioning Ahmed glaucoma valve improved BCVA and maintained control of IOP.

Keyword

Ahmed glaucoma valve implant; Phacoemulsification

MeSH Terms

Glaucoma*
Humans
Intraocular Pressure
Phacoemulsification*
Retrospective Studies
Visual Acuity

Figure

  • Figure 1. Change in number of antiglaucoma medications before phacoemusification to 12 months after surgery.

  • Figure 2. Graphs demonstrating the course of the intraocular pressure (IOP) (left) and the number of medications (right) before and after phacoemulsification in eyes with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Each dot represents the average IOP or the number of medications at each time point (95% confidence interval).


Reference

References

1. AGIS Investigators. The Advanced Glaucoma Intervention Study, 8: risk of cataract formation after trabeculectomy. Arch Ophthalmol. 2001; 119:1771–80.
2. Quigley HA. Reappraising the risks and benefits of aggressive glaucoma therapy. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:1985–6.
Article
3. Wilensky JT, Chen TC. Long-term results of trabeculectomy in eyes that were initially successful. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1996; 94:147–59.
Article
4. Chen PP, Weaver YK, Budenz DL, et al. Trabeculectomy function after cataract extraction. Ophthalmology. 1998; 105:1928–35.
5. Verges C, Cazal J, Lavin C. Surgical strategies in patients with cataract and glaucoma. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005; 16:44–52.
Article
6. Caprioli J, Park HJ, Kwon YH, Weitzman M. Temporal corneal phacoemulsification in filtered glaucoma patients. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc. 1997; 95:153–67.
7. Gujral S, Nouri-Mahdavi K, Caprioli J. Outcomes of small-incision cataract surgery in eyes with preexisting Ahmed glaucoma valves. Am J Ophthalmol. 2005; 140:911–3.
Article
8. Sa HS, Kee C. Effect of temporal clear corneal phacoemulsification on intraocular pressure in eyes with prior Ahmed glaucoma valve insertion. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1011–4.
Article
9. Erie JC, Baratz KH, Mahr MA, et al. Phacoemulsification in patients with Baerveldt tube shunts. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2006; 32:1489–91.
Article
10. Chung HW, Kook MS, Tchah HW. Ahmed valve implant and penetrating keratoplasty. J Korean Ophthalmol Soc. 2003; 44:73–80.
11. Bhattacharyya CA, WuDunn D, Lakhani V, et al. Cataract surgery after tube shunts. J Glaucoma. 2000; 9:453–7.
Article
12. Huang MC, Netland PA, Coleman AL, et al. Intermediate-term clinical experience with the Ahmed glaucoma valve implant. Am J Ophthalmol. 1999; 127:27–33.
13. Wilson MR, Mendis U, Paliwal A, et al. Long-term follow-up of primary glaucoma surgery with Ahmed glaucoma valve implant versus trabeculectomy. Am J Ophthalmol. 2003; 136:464–70.
Article
14. Mandal AK, Chelerkar V, Jain SS, et al. Outcome of cataract extraction and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation following glaucoma filtration surgery. Eye. 2005; 19:1000–8.
Article
15. Seah SKL, Jap A, Prata JA Jr, et al. Cataract surgery after trabeculectomy. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers. 1996; 27:587–94.
Article
16. Bigger JF, Becker B. Cataracts and primary open-angle glaucoma: the effect of uncomplicated cataract extraction on glaucoma control. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol. 1971; 75:260–72.
17. Shingleton BJ, O'Donoghue MW, Hall PE. Results of phacoemulsification in eyes with preexisting glaucoma filters. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003; 29:1093–6.
Article
18. Mangione CM, Phillips RS, Lawrence MG, et al. Improved visual function and attenuation of declines in health-related quality of life after cataract extraction. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994; 112:1419–25.
Article
19. Hayashi K, Hayashi H, Nakao F, Hayashi F. Influence of cataract surgery on automated perimetry in patients with glaucoma. Am J Ophthalmol. 2001; 132:41–6.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr