J Korean Ophthalmol Soc.  2006 Jan;47(1):37-41.

Comparison of Decentration and Tilt in Foldable Acrylic Intraocular Lenses

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea. eyedoc@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare the decentration and tilt between Acrysof(R) Single-piece and Acrysof(R) Multipiece posterior chamber intraocular lenses (PCLs).
METHODS
The subjects of this study comprised 14 patients (15 eyes) using an Acrysof(R) Single-piece and 14 patients (15 eyes) using an Acrysof(R) Multipiece. All of these PCLs were inserted into the capsular bag after continuous curvilinear capsulorhexis and phacoemulsification. The decentration and tilt of the Acrysof(R) Single-piece and the Acrysof(R) Multipiece were measured on the 1st, 30th and 60th postoperative day using an anterior eye segment analysis system (EAS-1000, Nidek, Japan).
RESULTS
There was no statistically significant difference in decentration between the Acrysof(R) Single-piece and the Acrysof(R) Multipiece PCL on the 1st (P=0.254), 30th (P=0.078), or 60th (P=0.520) postoperative day. Also, there was no statistically significant difference in tilt between the two PCLs on the 1st (P=0.165), 30th (P=0.395), or 60th (P=0.419) postoperative day.
CONCLUSIONS
Although the decentration and tilt of the Acrysof(R) Single-piece and the Acrysof(R) Multipiece PCL showed no significant difference after 60 postoperative days, inappropriate insertion into the capsular bag may necessitate more long-term study and follow-up with numerous cases.

Keyword

Acrysof(R) Multipiece; Acrysof(R) Single-piece; Decentration; Tilt

MeSH Terms

Anterior Eye Segment
Capsulorhexis
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lenses, Intraocular*
Phacoemulsification
Full Text Links
  • JKOS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr