J Korean Soc Med Inform.  2009 Sep;15(3):273-284.

The Consumers' Perceptions and Requirements for Personal Health Records in Korea

• Kim SY
• Kim HR
• Bae JB
• Kim Y

Abstract

OBJECTIVE
The aim of the study was to identify factors influencing the willingness of healthcare consumers to use personal health records (PHR) and to investigate the requirements for PHR services.
METHODS
A face-to-face interview was conducted with 400 healthcare consumers from the 3rd-18th of July 2008 using a structured questionnaire. To identity factors affecting the willingness to use PHR and to pay for PHR services, logistic regression analysis was performed. To investigate the requirements for PHR services according to the willingness of the consumers to use PHR and to pay for PHR services, t-test analysis was conducted.
RESULTS
Of the 400 healthcare consumers, 239 (59.8%) were willing to use PHR and 111 (27.8%) were willing to pay for PHR services. The willingness to use PHR was higher in the elderly, those with a disease, and those with experience to use health information on the Internet, and the willingness to pay for PHR services was higher in those with a relatively high income (p<0.05). The willingness to use PHR was approximately 13.5 (95% CI=1.43-126.55) and 3 times (95% CI=1.18-8.74) higher in those with average monthly household incomes >6,000,000 won and 4,500,000-6,000,000 won, respectively, than in those earning <1,500,000 won, and approximately 1.96 times (95% CI=1.18-3.27) higher in those with experience using health information on the Internet than in those without experience. The willingness to pay for PHR services was approximately 5.9 times (95% CI=1.84-19.06) higher in those with an income of 4,500,000-6,000,000 won than in those with an income <1,500,000 won (p<0.05). Demands for test results, medication history, family history, problem list, genetic information, clinical trial information, and social history were significantly higher in those with a willingness to use PHR and those with a willingness to pay for PHR services than in those without willingness to use PHR and those without a willingness to pay for PHR services (p<0.05). Compared to those without a willingness to pay for PHR services, those with a willingness to pay for PHR services showed a significantly higher demand for all the functions (p<0.01).
CONCLUSION
The results of this study suggest that healthcare consumers potentially have a considerable demand for PHR services, and although it is not recognized and used widely yet, PHR is an essential service. In order to enhance people's awareness of PHR and to promote people to use PHR services, we need efforts and initiatives to execute campaigns and education for people to ease access to the service, and to reduce the gap in service utilization skills.

Keyword

EHR; Electronic Health Records; Personal Health Records; Personal Health Records System; PHR; u-Health

MeSH Terms

Aged
Delivery of Health Care
Electronic Health Records
Family Characteristics
Health Records, Personal
Humans
Internet
Korea
Logistic Models
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Kim YS. Lifetime health maintenance program for Korean. J Korea Assoc Health Promot. 2004. 2(2):99–116.

2. Lester B. From disease prevention to health promotion. JAMA. 1999. 281(11):1030–1033.

3. Eysenbach G. Consumer health informatics. BMJ. 2000. 320(7251):1713–1716.

4. Ball MJ, Smith C, Bakalar RS. Personal health records: empowering consumers. J Healthc Inf Manag. 2007. 21(1):76–86.

5. Smith R. The future of healthcare systems. BMJ. 1997. 314(7093):1495–1496.

6. Kassirer JP. Patients, physicians, and the internet. Health Aff. 2000. 19(6):115–123.

7. Endsley S, Kibbe DC, Linares A, Colorafi K. An introduction to personal health records. Fam Pract Manag. 2006. 05. 13(5):57–62.

8. Tang PC, Ash JS, Bates DW, Overhage JM, Sands JZ. Personal health records: definition, benefits, and strategies for overcoming barriers to adoption. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006. 13(2):121–126.

9. A public-private collaboration. the personal health working group final report. Markle Foundation. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.markle.org/downloadable_assets/final_phwg_report1.pdf.

10. AHIMA e-HIM Personal Health Record Work Group. The Role of the Personal Health Record in the EHR. J AHIMA. 2005. 76(7):64A–64D.

11. HIMSS. Personal Health Records Definition and Position Statement. The Personal Health Record Steering Committee Report. 2007. 09. 28.

12. NAHIT. Defining Key health Information Technology Terms. The National Alliance for Health Information Technology Report. 2008. 04. 28.

13. Tang PC, Lansky D. The missing link: bridging the patient-provider health information gap. Health Affairs. 2005. 24(5):1290–1295.

14. Halamka JD, Mandl KD, Tang PC. Early experiences with personal health records. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2008. 15(1):1–7.

15. NIA. Informatization White Paper. The National Information Society Agency of Korea Final Report. 2008.

16. NIDA. Survey on the Computer and Internet Usage. The National Internet Development Agency of Korea Final Report. 2008. 02.

17. NIDA. Survey on the Internet Usage. The National Internet Development Agency of Korea Final Report. 2008. 11.

18. HL7. PHR-System Functional Model, Release 1. Draft Standard for Trial Use. 2008. 11. The EHR Technical Committee.

19. NCVHS. Personal Health Records and Personal Health Record Systems. The National Committee on Vital and Health Statistics Final Report. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.ncvhs.hhs.gov/0602nhiirpt.pdf.

20. HIMSS. Personal Health Records. HIMSS Vantage Point July 2006;4(1):1. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.himss.org/content/files/vantagepoint/pdf/vantagepoint_0706.pdf.

21. Attitudes of Americans regarding personal health records and nationwide electronic health information exchange. Key findings from two surveys of Americans conducted by Public Opinion Strategies, Alexandria, Va. Markle Foundation. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/101105_survey_summary.pdf.

22. Americans Overwhelmingly Believe Electronic PHR Could Improve Their Health. Markle Foundation. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.connectingforhealth.org/resources/ResearchBrief-200806.pdf.

23. Kim JH. Needs for healthcare consumer related Informatization in Healthcare Sector. Korea Health Industry Development Institute Final Report. 2006. 06.

24. Taylor H, Leitman R, editors. Patient/physician online communication: many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice doctors and health plans. Harris Interactive Health Care News. 2002;2(8):1-3. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2002Vol2_Iss08.pdf.

25. Gullo K, editor. Many Nationwide Believe in the Potential Benefits of Electronic Medical Records and are Interested in Online Communications with Physicians. Harris Interactive Health Care News. 2005;4(4):1-5. 2009. Retrieved July 31. Available at: http://harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/wsjhealthnews/WSJOnline_HI_Health-CarePoll2005vol4_iss04.pdf.

26. Adler KG. Web portals in primary care: an evaluation of patient readiness and willingness to pay for online services. J Med Internet Res. 2006. 8(4):e26.

27. Cho SK, Kim JY, Na YJ, Lee MJ. How to Improve the Electoral Polls?: the case of the 2006 local elections. J Korean Assoc Survey Res. 2007. 8(1):31–54.