J Periodontal Implant Sci.  2013 Apr;43(2):51-57.

Occlusion for implant-supported fixed dental prostheses in partially edentulous patients: a literature review and current concepts

• Yuan JC
• Sukotjo C

Abstract

Implant treatment has become the treatment of choice to replace missing teeth in partially edentulous areas. Dental implants present different biological and biomechanical characteristics than natural teeth. Occlusion is considered to be one of the most important factors contributing to implant success. Most literature on implant occlusal concepts is based on expert opinion, anecdotal experiences, in vitro and animal studies, and only limited clinical research. Furthermore, scientific literature regarding implant occlusion, particularly in implant-supported fixed dental prostheses remains controversial. In this study, the current status of implant occlusion was reviewed and discussed. Further randomized clinical research to investigate the correlation between implant occlusion, the implant success rate, and its risk factors is warranted to determine best clinical practices.

Keyword

Dental implants; Dental occlusion; Fixed partial denture; Implant-supported dental prosthesis; Review

MeSH Terms

Animals
Dental Implants
Dental Occlusion
Dental Prosthesis
Dental Prosthesis, Implant-Supported
Denture, Partial, Fixed
Expert Testimony
Risk Factors
Tooth
Dental Implants

Reference

1. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, Bragger U, Pjetursson BE, Lang NP, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. 20:441–451.

2. Albrektsson T, Donos N. Working Group 1. Implant survival and complications. The Third EAO consensus conference 2012. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. 23:Suppl 6. 63–65.

3. Jung RE, Pjetursson BE, Glauser R, Zembic A, Zwahlen M, Lang NP. A systematic review of the 5-year survival and complication rates of implant-supported single crowns. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. 19:119–130.

4. Pjetursson BE, Bragger U, Lang NP, Zwahlen M. Comparison of survival and complication rates of tooth-supported fixed dental prostheses (FDPs) and implant-supported FDPs and single crowns (SCs). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. 18:Suppl 3. 97–113.

5. Goodacre CJ, Bernal G, Rungcharassaeng K, Kan JY. Clinical complications with implants and implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 2003. 90:121–132.

6. Sadowsky SJ. The role of complete denture principles in implant prosthodontics. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2003. 31:905–909.

7. Rangert BR, Sullivan RM, Jemt TM. Load factor control for implants in the posterior partially edentulous segment. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997. 12:360–370.

8. Schulte W. Implants and the periodontium. Int Dent J. 1995. 45:16–26.

9. Falcón-Antenucci RM, Pellizzer EP, de Carvalho , Goiato MC, Noritomi PY. Influence of cusp inclination on stress distribution in implant-supported prostheses: a three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthodont. 2010. 19:381–386.

10. Kaukinen JA, Edge MJ, Lang BR. The influence of occlusal design on simulated masticatory forces transferred to implant-retained prostheses and supporting bone. J Prosthet Dent. 1996. 76:50–55.

11. Weinberg LA. Reduction of implant loading with therapeutic biomechanics. Implant Dent. 1998. 7:277–285.

12. Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. 1993. 3rd ed. St. Louis: Mosby.

13. Morneburg TR, Proschel PA. In vivo forces on implants influenced by occlusal scheme and food consistency. Int J Prosthodont. 2003. 16:481–486.

14. Gunne J, Rangert B, Glantz PO, Svensson A. Functional loads on freestanding and connected implants in three-unit mandibular prostheses opposing complete dentures: an in vivo study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1997. 12:335–341.

15. Kim Y, Oh TJ, Misch CE, Wang HL. Occlusal considerations in implant therapy: clinical guidelines with biomechanical rationale. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2005. 16:26–35.

16. Nedir R, Bischof M, Szmukler-Moncler S, Belser UC, Samson J. Prosthetic complications with dental implants: from an up-to-8-year experience in private practice. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2006. 21:919–928.

17. Romeo E, Lops D, Margutti E, Ghisolfi M, Chiapasco M, Vogel G. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prostheses in partially edentulous arches. A seven-year prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2003. 14:303–311.

18. Romeo E, Tomasi C, Finini I, Casentini P, Lops D. Implant-supported fixed cantilever prosthesis in partially edentulous jaws: a cohort prospective study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2009. 20:1278–1285.

19. Yokoyama S, Wakabayashi N, Shiota M, Ohyama T. The influence of implant location and length on stress distribution for three-unit implant-supported posterior cantilever fixed partial dentures. J Prosthet Dent. 2004. 91:234–240.

20. Gross MD. Occlusion in implant dentistry. A review of the literature of prosthetic determinants and current concepts. Aust Dent J. 2008. 53:Suppl 1. S60–S68.

21. Blanes RJ, Bernard JP, Blanes ZM, Belser UC. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. 18:707–714.

22. Misch CE, Goodacre CJ, Finley JM, Misch CM, Marinbach M, Dabrowsky T, et al. Consensus conference panel report: crown-height space guidelines for implant dentistry-part 1. Implant Dent. 2005. 14:312–318.

23. Nissan J, Ghelfan O, Gross O, Priel I, Gross M, Chaushu G. The effect of crown/implant ratio and crown height space on stress distribution in unsplinted implant supporting restorations. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011. 69:1934–1939.

24. Schneider D, Witt L, Hammerle CH. Influence of the crown-to-implant length ratio on the clinical performance of implants supporting single crown restorations: a cross-sectional retrospective 5-year investigation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012. 23:169–174.

25. Schulte J, Flores AM, Weed M. Crown-to-implant ratios of single tooth implant-supported restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2007. 98:1–5.

26. Assunção WG, Gomes EA, Barao VA, Delben JA, Tabata LF, de Sousa EA. Effect of superstructure materials and misfit on stress distribution in a single implant-supported prosthesis: a finite element analysis. J Craniofac Surg. 2010. 21:689–695.

27. Cibirka RM, Razzoog ME, Lang BR, Stohler CS. Determining the force absorption quotient for restorative materials used in implant occlusal surfaces. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 67:361–364.

28. Erneklint C, Odman P, Ortengren U, Rasmusson L. Tolerance test of five different types of crowns on single-tooth implants. Int J Prosthodont. 1998. 11:233–239.

29. Sevimay M, Usumez A, Eskitascioglu G. The influence of various occlusal materials on stresses transferred to implant-supported prostheses and supporting bone: a three-dimensional finite-element study. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater. 2005. 73:140–147.

30. Skalak R. Biomechanical considerations in osseointegrated prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1983. 49:843–848.

31. Naert I, Quirynen M, van Steenberghe D, Darius P. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part II: Prosthetic aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 68:949–956.

32. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D, Nys L. A study of 589 consecutive implants supporting complete fixed prostheses. Part I: Periodontal aspects. J Prosthet Dent. 1992. 68:655–663.

33. Lindquist LW, Carlsson GE, Jemt T. A prospective 15-year follow-up study of mandibular fixed prostheses supported by osseointegrated implants: clinical results and marginal bone loss. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996. 7:329–336.

34. Papaspyridakos P, Lal K. Computer-assisted design/computer-assisted manufacturing zirconia implant fixed complete prostheses: clinical results and technical complications up to 4 years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2013. 24:659–665.

35. Johansson A, Omar R, Carlsson GE. Bruxism and prosthetic treatment: a critical review. J Prosthodont Res. 2011. 55:127–136.

36. Manfredini D, Bucci MB, Sabattini VB, Lobbezoo F. Bruxism: overview of current knowledge and suggestions for dental implants planning. Cranio. 2011. 29:304–312.

37. Manfredini D, Poggio CE, Lobbezoo F. Is bruxism a risk factor for dental implants? A systematic review of the literature. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2012. 11. 13. [Epub]. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cid.12015.

38. Sarmento HR, Dantas RV, Pereira-Cenci T, Faot F. Elements of implant-supported rehabilitation planning in patients with bruxism. J Craniofac Surg. 2012. 23:1905–1909.

39. Lobbezoo F, Brouwers JE, Cune MS, Naeije M. Dental implants in patients with bruxing habits. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. 33:152–159.

40. Lobbezoo F, Van Der Zaag J, Naeije M. Bruxism: its multiple causes and its effects on dental implants: an updated review. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. 33:293–300.

41. Maló P, Nobre Md, Lopes A. The rehabilitation of completely edentulous maxillae with different degrees of resorption with four or more immediately loaded implants: a 5-year retrospective study and a new classification. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2011. 4:227–243.

42. De Boever AL, Keersmaekers K, Vanmaele G, Kerschbaum T, Theuniers G, De Boever JA. Prosthetic complications in fixed endosseous implant-borne reconstructions after an observations period of at least 40 months. J Oral Rehabil. 2006. 33:833–839.

43. Siebers D, Gehrke P, Schliephake H. Delayed function of dental implants: a 1- to 7-year follow-up study of 222 implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2010. 25:1195–1202.

44. Zupnik J, Kim SW, Ravens D, Karimbux N, Guze K. Factors associated with dental implant survival: a 4-year retrospective analysis. J Periodontol. 2011. 82:1390–1395.

45. Luongo G, Oteri G. A noninterventional study documenting use and success of implants with a new chemically modified titanium surface in daily dental practice. J Oral Implantol. 2010. 36:305–314.

46. Eckert SE, Meraw SJ, Weaver AL, Lohse CM. Early experience with Wide-Platform Mk II implants. Part I: Implant survival. Part II: Evaluation of risk factors involving implant survival. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2001. 16:208–216.

47. Ji TJ, Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Roe P, Lozada JL. Immediate loading of maxillary and mandibular implant-supported fixed complete dentures: a 1- to 10-year retrospective study. J Oral Implantol. 2012. 38 Spec No:469–476.

48. Brägger U, Aeschlimann S, Burgin W, Hammerle CH, Lang NP. Biological and technical complications and failures with fixed partial dentures (FPD) on implants and teeth after four to five years of function. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001. 12:26–34.

49. Kinsel RP, Lin D. Retrospective analysis of porcelain failures of metal ceramic crowns and fixed partial dentures supported by 729 implants in 152 patients: patient-specific and implant-specific predictors of ceramic failure. J Prosthet Dent. 2009. 101:388–394.

50. Adell R, Eriksson B, Lekholm U, Branemark PI, Jemt T. Long-term follow-up study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of totally edentulous jaws. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1990. 5:347–359.

51. Rangert B, Jemt T, Jorneus L. Forces and moments on Branemark implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1989. 4:241–247.

52. Taylor TD, Wiens J, Carr A. Evidence-based considerations for removable prosthodontic and dental implant occlusion: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent. 2005. 94:555–560.

53. Lang NP, Zitzmann NU. Working Group 3 of the VIII European Workshop on Periodontology. Clinical research in implant dentistry: evaluation of implant-supported restorations, aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Periodontol. 2012. 39:Suppl 12. 133–138.

54. Carlsson GE. Dental occlusion: modern concepts and their application in implant prosthodontics. Odontology. 2009. 97:8–17.

55. Taylor TD, Belser U, Mericske-Stern R. Prosthodontic considerations. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000. 11:Suppl 1. 101–107.

56. Klineberg I, Kingston D, Murray G. The bases for using a particular occlusal design in tooth and implant-borne reconstructions and complete dentures. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2007. 18:Suppl 3. 151–167.

57. Brånemark PI, Hansson BO, Adell R, Breine U, Lindstrom J, Hallen O, et al. Osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Experience from a 10-year period. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Suppl. 1977. 16:1–132.

58. Sekine H, Komiyama Y, Potta H, Yoshida K. van Steenberghe D, Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Henry PJ, Holt R, Liden G, editors. Mobility characteristics and tactile sensitivity of osseointegrated fixture-supporting systems. Tissue integration in oral and maxillofacial reconstruction. 1986. Amsterdam: Excerpta Medica;326–332.

59. Parfitt GJ. Measurement of the physiological mobility of individual teeth in an axial direction. J Dent Res. 1960. 39:608–618.

60. Hillam DG. Stresses in the periodontal ligament. J Periodontal Res. 1973. 8:51–56.

61. Wiskott HW, Cugnoni J, Scherrer SS, Ammann P, Botsis J, Belser UC. Bone reactions to controlled loading of endosseous implants: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. 19:1093–1102.

62. Duyck J, Ronold HJ, Van Oosterwyck H, Naert I, Vander Sloten J, Ellingsen JE. The influence of static and dynamic loading on marginal bone reactions around osseointegrated implants: an animal experimental study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001. 12:207–218.

63. Zarb GA, Schmitt A. The longitudinal clinical effectiveness of osseointegrated dental implants: the Toronto Study. Part II: The prosthetic results. J Prosthet Dent. 1990. 64:53–61.

64. Wood MR, Vermilyea SG. Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. A review of selected dental literature on evidence-based treatment planning for dental implants: report of the Committee on Research in Fixed Prosthodontics of the Academy of Fixed Prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 2004. 92:447–462.

65. Misch CE. Occlusal considerations for implant supported prostheses. 1999. St. Louis: Mosby.

66. Adell R, Lekholm U, Rockler B, Branemark PI. A 15-year study of osseointegrated implants in the treatment of the edentulous jaw. Int J Oral Surg. 1981. 10:387–416.

67. Fu JH, Hsu YT, Wang HL. Identifying occlusal overload and how to deal with it to avoid marginal bone loss around implants. Eur J Oral Implantol. 2012. 5:Suppl. S91–S103.

68. Isidor F. Loss of osseointegration caused by occlusal load of oral implants: a clinical and radiographic study in monkeys. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1996. 7:143–152.

69. Miyata T, Kobayashi Y, Araki H, Ohto T, Shin K. The influence of controlled occlusal overload on peri-implant tissue. Part 3: a histologic study in monkeys. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000. 15:425–431.

70. Quirynen M, Naert I, van Steenberghe D. Fixture design and overload influence marginal bone loss and fixture success in the Brånemark system. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1992. 3:104–111.

71. Rangert B, Krogh PH, Langer B, Van Roekel N. Bending overload and implant fracture: a retrospective clinical analysis. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1995. 10:326–334.

72. Rosenberg ES, Torosian JP, Slots J. Microbial differences in 2 clinically distinct types of failures of osseointegrated implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1991. 2:135–144.

73. Heitz-Mayfield LJ, Schmid B, Weigel C, Gerber S, Bosshardt DD, Jonsson J, et al. Does excessive occlusal load affect osseointegration? An experimental study in the dog. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004. 15:259–268.

74. Isidor F. Histological evaluation of peri-implant bone at implants subjected to occlusal overload or plaque accumulation. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997. 8:1–9.

75. Duyck J, Van Oosterwyck H, Vander Sloten J, De Cooman M, Puers R, Naert I. Magnitude and distribution of occlusal forces on oral implants supporting fixed prostheses: an in vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000. 11:465–475.

76. Hoshaw SJ, Brunski JB, Cochran GV. Mechanical loading of branemark implants affects interfacial bone modeling and remodeling. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994. 9:345–360.

77. Bornstein MM, Valderrama P, Jones AA, Wilson TG, Seibl R, Cochran DL. Bone apposition around two different sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implant surfaces: a histomorphometric study in canine mandibles. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2008. 19:233–241.

78. Cochran D, Oates T, Morton D, Jones A, Buser D, Peters F. Clinical field trial examining an implant with a sand-blasted, acid-etched surface. J Periodontol. 2007. 78:974–982.

79. Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol. 1999. 70:1523–1539.

80. Cochran DL, Jackson JM, Bernard JP, ten Bruggenkate CM, Buser D, Taylor TD, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011. 26:1324–1332.

81. Salvi GE, Gallini G, Lang NP. Early loading (2 or 6 weeks) of sandblasted and acid-etched (SLA) ITI implants in the posterior mandible. A 1-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004. 15:142–149.

82. Gotfredsen K, Berglundh T, Lindhe J. Bone reactions adjacent to titanium implants subjected to static load: a study in the dog (I). Clin Oral Implants Res. 2001. 12:1–8.

83. Celletti R, Pameijer CH, Bracchetti G, Donath K, Persichetti G, Visani I. Histologic evaluation of osseointegrated implants restored in nonaxial functional occlusion with preangled abutments. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 1995. 15:562–573.

84. Asikainen P, Klemetti E, Vuillemin T, Sutter F, Rainio V, Kotilainen R. Titanium implants and lateral forces. An experimental study with sheep. Clin Oral Implants Res. 1997. 8:465–468.

85. Schwarz MS. Mechanical complications of dental implants. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000. 11:Suppl 1. 156–158.

86. Dario LJ. How occlusal forces change in implant patients: a clinical research report. J Am Dent Assoc. 1995. 126:1130–1133.

87. Stuart C. Articulation of human teeth. 1955. South Pasadena: Scientific press.

88. Schuyler C. Considerations of occlusioin in fixed partial dentures. Dent Clin North Am. 1959. 37:175–185.

89. D'Amico A. The canine teeth: normal functional relation of the natural teeth of man. J South Calif Dent Assoc. 1958. 26:194–241.

90. Misch CE, Bidez MW. Implant-protected occlusion: a biomechanical rationale. Compendium. 1994. 15:1330. 1332. 1334.

91. Stanford CM. Issues and considerations in dental implant occlusion: what do we know, and what do we need to find out? J Calif Dent Assoc. 2005. 33:329–336.

92. Rilo B, da Silva JL, Mora MJ, Santana U. Guidelines for occlusion strategy in implant-borne prostheses: a review. Int Dent J. 2008. 58:139–145.

93. Engelman MJ. Occlusion. 1996. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co..

94. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitset LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 1997. 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co..

95. Branemark PI, Zarb G, Albrektsson T. Tissue integrated prosthesis. 1985. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing Co..

96. Hobkirk JA, Psarros KJ. The influence of occlusal surface material on peak masticatory forces using osseointegrated implant-supported prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1992. 7:345–352.