J Korean Soc Spine Surg.  2011 Jun;18(2):43-50.

Clinical Characteristics and Surgical Results of Spinal Intradural Tumor

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Eulji University School of Medicine, Korea. hjkim@eulji.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Daejeon Veterans Hospital, Korea.
  • 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hongseong Medical Center, Korea.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study about spinal intradural tumor.
OBJECTIVES
We analyzed clinical symptom, findings of MRI, and surgical outcome of spinal intradural tumor. SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW: Intradural tumors are not commonly reported and they show non-specific clinical features.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
In this study, 18 patients who underwent surgical treatment and radiologically and pathologically diagnosed as spinal intradural tumor from 1997 to 2009 were reviewed. We evaluated pain, neurological symptoms, location of tumor as well as degrees of signal intensity and its enhancement of MRI(T1 and T2). And clinical outcomes were analyzed according to Klekamp-Samii scoring system and Visual Analogue Scale(VAS).
RESULTS
All patients were clinically suffered from back pain and radiating pain of lower extremity including 3 patients with neurological symptoms. We radiologically found single tumor in 16 cases and masses more than two lesion in 2 cases. 1 case was located on cord level(T7), 14 cases cauda equine level, and 3 cases sacral level. We performed laminectomy in 18 cases and posterior instrumentation was applied to 8 cases. In clinical features, mean Klekamp-Samii score was improved from 21.6 to 23.5(p<0.05) and VAS was recovered from 5.2 to 3.0 (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS
Spinal intradural tumor has non-specific clinical symptoms. Therefore we should perform MRI to find intradural tumor and active management including surgical treatment should be performed due to clinically good results.

Keyword

Spinal intradural tumor; MRI; Clinical symptom

MeSH Terms

Back Pain
Humans
Laminectomy
Lower Extremity
Retrospective Studies

Figure

  • Fig. 1. Anteroposterior(A) and lateral(B) radiographs show non-specific findings.

  • Fig. 2. There are well-defined masses lesion with intermediate signal intensity on both T1(A) and T2 weighted images(B) at the level of L1 and L4, re-spectively. The lesions show homogenous, strong enhancement(C).

  • Fig. 3. Intraoperative photograph shows totally encapsulated intradural mass(A). Two encapsulated tumors are resected from different locations(B, C).

  • Fig. 4. Histopathologic findings show excised mass consists of Antony A and Antony B type portions.

  • Fig. 5. Enhanced MRI show schwannoma with peripheral enhancement on sagittal (A) and axial(B) images.


Reference

1. Ahn SJ, Song MH, Yoo SH, Lee MS, Kang SW, Kim BJ. Solitary intradural metastatic tumor from renal cell carcino-ma. A case report. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2009; 16:299–303.
Article
2. Ha KY, Ryoo SJ, Lee JS, Cho YH. Distant intradural metastasis by direct seeding through dural opening from the metastasis of rectal cancer. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2005; 12:83–6.
Article
3. Van Goethem JW, van den Hauwe L, Ozsarlak O, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM. Spinal tumors. Eur J Radiol. 2004; 50:159–76.
Article
4. Conti P, Pansini G, Mouchaty H, Capuano C, Conti R. Spinal neurinomas: retrospective analysis and longterm outcome of 179 consecutively operated cases and review of the literature. Surg Neurol. 2004; 61:34–43.
Article
5. Klekamp J, Samii M. Surgical results for spinal meningiomas. Surg Neurol. 1999; 52:552–62.
Article
6. el-Mahdy W, Kane PJ, Powell MP, Crockard HA. Spinal intradural tumours: Part I–Extramedullary. Br J Neurosurg. 1999; 13:550–7.
Article
7. Shin BJ, Lee JC, Yoon TK, et al. Surgical treatments of intradural extramedullary tumor. J Korean Soc Spine Surg. 2002; 9:230–7.
Article
8. Jinnai T, Koyama T. Clinical characteristics of spinal nerve sheath tumors: analysis of 149 cases. Neurosurgery. 2005; 56:510–5.
Article
9. Friedman DP, Tartaglino LM, Flanders AE. Intradural schwannomas of the spine: MR findings with emphasis on contrast-enhancement characteristics. AJR Am J Roent-genol. 1992; 158:1347–50.
Article
10. Roux FX, Nataf F, Pinaudeau M, Borne G, Devaux B, Meder JF. Intraspinal meningiomas: review of 54 cases with discussion of poor prognosis factors and modern therapeutic management. Surg Neurol. 1996; 46:458–63.
Article
11. Gezen F, Kahraman S, Canakci Z, Beduk A. Review of 36 cases of spinal cord meningioma. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000; 25:727–31.
Article
12. Harry N. The spine. The textbook of spinal surgey. 4th. Philadelphia: WB Saunders Co;1998. p. 1366.
13. Stein BM, McCormick PC. Intramedullary neoplasms and vascular malformations. Clin Neurosurg. 1992; 39:361–87.
14. Kane PJ, el-Mahdy W, Singh A, Powell MP, Crockard HA. Spinal intradural tumours: Part II–Intramedullary. Br J Neurosur. 1999; 13:558–63.
Article
15. Miller DC. Surgical pathology of intramedullary spinal cord neoplasms. J Neurooncol. 2000; 47:189–94.
16. Traul DE, Shaffrey ME, Schiff D. Part I: spinal-cord neo-plasms-intradural neoplasms. Lancet Oncol. 2007; 8:35–45.
Article
17. Cushing H, Eisenhardt L. Meningiomas: their classification, regional behavior, life history and surgical end results. 1st. Ilinois, Spingfield: Charles C Thomas;1938. p. 735.
18. McCormick PC. Anatomic principles of intradural spinal surgery. Clin Neurosurg. 1994; 41:204–23.
Full Text Links
  • JKSS
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr