World J Mens Health.  2013 Dec;31(3):268-271.

A Case of Duplicated Vas Deferens Found Incidentally during Varicocelectomy

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. dock97@hanm ail.net

Abstract

Duplication of the vas deferens is a very rare congenital anomaly in which two vasa deferentia coexist within the spermatic cord. Duplication of the vas deferens can be found during herniorrhaphy, vasectomy, and varicocelectomy performed on the spermatic cord or around the spermatic cord. However, it is estimated that the incidence of duplication of the vas deferens is under-reported and under-recognized. Unless anomalies of the vas deferens such as duplication of the vas deferens are recognized by surgeons, it will be difficult to reduce vas deferens injuries and achieve a satisfactory surgical outcome. In addition, care should be taken in cases of duplication of the vas deferens because it can be complicated by non-testicular genitourinary anomalies. We report a case of duplication of the vas deferens discovered during routine varicocelectomy.

Keyword

Congenital abnormalities; Varicocele; Vas deferens

MeSH Terms

Congenital Abnormalities
Herniorrhaphy
Incidence
Spermatic Cord
Varicocele
Vas Deferens*
Vasectomy

Figure

  • Fig. 1 (A) Duplication of the vas deferens identified during left sided varicocelectomy. The arrows mark two parallel vasa deferentia at the level of the inguinal canal. A spermatic artery hung with silk sutures. (B) Two vasa deferentia enter into the epididymal tail (held by vessel loops).


Reference

1. Akay F, Atug F, Turkeri L. Partial duplication of the vas deferens at the level of inguinal canal. Int J Urol. 2005; 12:773–775.
Article
2. Liang MK, Subramanian A, Weedin J, Griffith DP, Awad SS. True duplication of the vas deferens: a case report and review of literature. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012; 44:385–391.
Article
3. Shariat SF, Naderi AS, Miles B, Slawin KM. Anomalies of the wolffian duct derivatives encountered at radical prostatectomy. Rev Urol. 2005; 7:75–80.
4. Binderow SR, Shah KD, Dolgin SE. True duplication of the vas deferens. J Pediatr Surg. 1993; 28:269–270.
Article
5. Carr R. Apparent bilateral duplication of the vas deferens. Br J Urol. 1993; 71:354.
Article
6. Vohra S, Morgentaler A. Congenital anomalies of the vas deferens, epididymis, and seminal vesicles. Urology. 1997; 49:313–321.
Article
7. Coetzee T. Double vas deferens: a case report. Br J Urol. 1959; 31:336–339.
Article
8. Wiedemann A, Jaussi R, Rabs U. Testicular torsion in testicular duplication. Kasuistik und Literaturubersicht. Urologe A. 2005; 44:162–165.
9. Tolete-Velcek F, Leddomado E, Hansbrough F, Thelmo WL. Alleged resection of the vas deferens: medicolegal implications. J Pediatr Surg. 1988; 23:21–23.
Article
Full Text Links
  • WJMH
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr