Korean J Urol.  2010 Feb;51(2):115-121.

Comparative Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Photoselective Vaporization of the Prostate for Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia according to Prostate Size

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Urology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea. volley@snu.ac.kr
  • 2Department of Urology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study was conducted to perform a comparative analysis of the efficacy and safety of photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in men with a prostate volume greater than 60 cc.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The clinical data of 249 men with symptomatic BPH who underwent PVP between January 2006 and June 2008 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were classified into two groups according to their prostate volume (group A, <60 cc; group B, > or =60 cc). The preoperative evaluation included a digital rectal exam, urinalysis, prostate-specific antigen levels, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL) score, maximal flow rate (Qmax), postvoid residual urine volume (PVR), and transrectal ultrasonography. The total operative time, used energy (kJ), urethral Foley catheter indwelling period, and the number of hospital days were recorded afterward. The IPSS, QoL score, Qmax, and PVR were evaluated at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS
In both groups, significant improvements in the subjective and objective voiding parameters were achieved and these improvements were sustainable for at least 1 year with minimal complications. During the follow-up period, the PVR in group B significantly increased. Retrograde ejaculation and urethral stricture were the common complications in both groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence rate.
CONCLUSIONS
PVP is safe and efficacious, with durable results for men with symptomatic BPH and large prostate volumes.

Keyword

Prostatic hyperplasia; Laser therapy; Comparative study

MeSH Terms

Catheters
Ejaculation
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Incidence
Laser Therapy
Male
Operative Time
Prostate
Prostate-Specific Antigen
Prostatic Hyperplasia
Quality of Life
Retrospective Studies
Urethral Stricture
Urinalysis
Volatilization
Prostate-Specific Antigen

Figure

  • FIG. 1 Postoperative follow-up outcome parameters of patients who underwent PVP according to prostate size. IPSS: International Prostate Symptom Score, QoL: quality of life, Qmax: maximal urinary flow rate, PVR: postvoid residual volume, Group A: less than 60 ml, Group B: 60 ml or more, a: p<0.01, b: p<0.05, c: p=0.119.


Reference

1. Lee E, Yoo KY, Kim Y, Shin Y, Lee C. Prevalence of lower urinary tract symptoms in Korean men in a community-based study. Eur Urol. 1998; 33:17–21. PMID: 9471036.
Article
2. Madersbacher S, Alivizatos G, Nordling J, Sanz CR, Emberton M, de la Rosette JJ. EAU 2004 guidelines on assessment, therapy and follow-up of men with lower urinary tract symptoms suggestive of benign prostatic obstruction (BPH guidelines). Eur Urol. 2004; 46:547–554. PMID: 15474261.
Article
3. Wasson JH, Reda DJ, Bruskewitz RC, Elinson J, Keller AM, Henderson WG. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group on Transurethral Resection of the Prostate. A comparison of transurethral surgery with watchful waiting for moderate symptoms of benign prostatic hyperplasia. N Engl J Med. 1995; 332:75–79. PMID: 7527493.
Article
4. Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, Hofmann R. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP)--incidence, management, and prevention. Eur Urol. 2006; 50:969–979. PMID: 16469429.
Article
5. Te AE, Malloy TR, Stein BS, Ulchaker JC, Nseyo UO, Hai MA, et al. Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: 12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial. J Urol. 2004; 172:1404–1408. PMID: 15371855.
Article
6. Bachmann A, Schürch L, Ruszat R, Wyler SF, Seifert HH, Müller A, et al. Photoselective vaporization (PVP) versus transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP): a prospective bi-centre study of perioperative morbidity and early functional outcome. Eur Urol. 2005; 48:965–971. PMID: 16126327.
Article
7. Spaliviero M, Araki M, Page JB, Wong C. Catheter-free 120W lithium triborate (LBO) laser photoselective vaporization prostatectomy (PVP) for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Lasers Surg Med. 2008; 40:529–534. PMID: 18798292.
Article
8. Horasanli K, Silay MS, Altay B, Tanriverdi O, Sarica K, Miroglu C. Photoselective potassium titanyl phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization versus transurethral resection of the prostate for prostates larger than 70 mL: a short-term prospective randomized trial. Urology. 2008; 71:247–251. PMID: 18308094.
Article
9. Hwang CH, Cho CK, Lee YK, Hong SJ. Comparative analysis of short-term efficacy and complication of photoselective vaporization for benign prostatic hyperplasia which was classified by prostate size. Korean J Urol. 2007; 48:826–831.
Article
10. Sandhu JS, Ng C, Vanderbrink BA, Egan C, Kaplan SA, Te AE. High-power potassium-titanyl-phosphate photoselective laser vaporization of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia in men with large prostates. Urology. 2004; 64:1155–1159. PMID: 15596189.
Article
11. Choo SH, Han DH, Lee SW. The efficacy and safety of KTP photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: the 2-year results. Korean J Urol. 2008; 49:831–836.
Article
12. Monoski MA, Gonzalez RR, Sandhu JS, Reddy B, Te AE. Urodynamic predictors of outcomes with photoselective laser vaporization prostatectomy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and preoperative retention. Urology. 2006; 68:312–317. PMID: 16904443.
Article
13. Reich O, Bachmann A, Siebels M, Hofstetter A, Stief CG, Sulser T. High power (80 W) potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization of the prostate in 66 high risk patients. J Urol. 2005; 173:158–160. PMID: 15592063.
Article
14. McAllister WJ, Gilling PJ. Vaporization of the prostate. Curr Opin Urol. 2004; 14:31–34. PMID: 15091047.
Article
15. Lee J, Kang SH, Kim JJ. Evaluation of the quality of life and the efficacy of treatment after high power potassium-titanyl-phosphate (KTP) laser vaporization for patients with a prostate volume greater than 40cc. Korean J Urol. 2007; 48:956–964.
Article
16. Yu X, Elliott SP, Wilt TJ, McBean AM. Practice patterns in benign prostatic hyperplasia surgical therapy: the dramatic increase in minimally invasive technologies. J Urol. 2008; 180:241–245. PMID: 18499180.
Article
17. Alivizatos G, Skolarikos A. Greenlight laser in benign prostatic hyperplasia: turning green into gold. Curr Opin Urol. 2008; 18:46–49. PMID: 18090489.
Article
18. Ahmed HU, Thwaini A, Shergill IS, Hammadeh MY, Arya M, Kaisary AV. Greenlight prostatectomy: a challenge to the gold standard? A review of KTP photoselective vaporization of the prostate. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2007; 17:156–163. PMID: 17581457.
Full Text Links
  • KJU
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr