Korean J Aerosp Environ Med.
1999 Sep;9(3):291-301.
Diagnostic value of serologric test for detection of Helicobacter pylori infection
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Family Medicine, Medical College, Inha University.
Abstract
-
BACKGROUND: Ever since Helicobacter pylori was discovered in 1983 by Warren and Marshall, many
studies were conducted resulting in drastic change of the previous concept of gastrointestinal
disorders and its treatment. Most people in developing countries are considered to be exposed
to the organism at a very early age, being more susceptible to infection. This study was done
to find out the diagnostic value of serology antibody test for Helicobacter pylori infection by
comparing differences in those checked positive for H. pylori relative to their symptoms and
findings on endoscopy, biopsy, and barium swallow.
METHODS
Subjects totaling 1240 who visited the Health Promotion Center of a university
hospital were surveyed with questionnaire and were performed serology antibody test for H.
pylori. 532 subjects underwent endoscopy and biopsy and in 708 subjects barium swallow was
performed. All subjects were compared with respect to gastrointestinal symptoms, findings of
pathology from the endoscopic and radiologic procedures with their antibody test results and
titration.
RESULTS
Among 1240 patients, 804 (64.8%) were positive for Helicobacter pylori antibody. There
were 449 males (68%), and 355 females (61%), which was statistically significant (p<
0.05).There was no difference in the positive rates of H. pylori according to smoking,
drinking, and exercise. Higher prevalence of family history for gastric cancer was shown among
those positive for H. pylori (p< 0.01). There was no difference noted in relation to gastric
symptoms or past history of gastrointestinal disorders in the two groups. Relative to the
gastric symptoms complained by the patients, the findings on endoscopy, biopsy and radiologic
study, most of those checked positive for H. pylori were shown to have antibody titers in the
range of 20 to 40 units/mL with 83.1% for symptoms, 83.6% for endoscopy, 84.8% for biopsy,
81.7% for barium swallow.
CONCLUSION
There was no significant difference among those positive and negative for serology
antibody test with respect to gastrointestinal symptoms, findings on endoscopy, biopsy, and
barium swallow in this study. But because H. pylori is associated with most of the
gastrointestinal pathology, testing H. pylori with serology antibody method can be beneficial
and useful for its accuracy in primary care setting where further investigation is not
possible.