Korean J Adult Nurs.  2013 Dec;25(6):622-632.

A Comparative Study of the Nurse Licensure Exam Systems between the United States and South Korea

• Kwak C
• Yun SN
• Kim SJ

Abstract

PURPOSE
This study was conducted to compare the nurse licensure examination system in Korea with that of the United States (US).
METHODS
Focus interviews with the administrative staff of the National Council of State Boards of Nursing (NCSBN) were held. two areas were explored in the interviews: the item development process and the general administrative operating procedures.
RESULTS
NCLEX-RN items are designed for entry-level practice. The items are subjected to a series of 12 steps including a item writing panel, a content and editorial review, a sensitivity panel, a pre-test, a Differential item functioning panel and a committee review. NCSBN is responsible for the test for registered nurses and one for practical nurses. In contrast the Korean National Health Personnel Licensing Board (KNHPLB) is responsible for nursing is and 21 other health related licensure. Another difference is that in Korea there is no consistent and specialized staff to develop question items. Items are developed by educators who are not active nurses (this last statemtne is not a finding but a point of view usually not given in findings.).
CONCLUSION
Korean nurses form the largest group of health related job categories and the most direct to health care consumers. Therefore, the nursing licensure exam should be acknowledged as the most influential licensure exam in health care services. We recommend a nursing specialized licensing institution to be established with active nurse'participation in item development process to reflect clinical practice into licensure exam.

MeSH Terms

Delivery of Health Care
Health Personnel
Humans
Korea
Licensure*
Licensure, Nursing
Nursing
Republic of Korea*
United States*
Writing

Figure

• 

  Figure 1. Process of item development.

• 

  Figure 2. Item development process in Korea. Retrieved from the report of the National Health Personnel Licensing Board (2010).

Reference

Emory J.2013. Standardized mastery content assessments for predicting NCLEX-RN outcomes. Nurse Education. 38(2):

Jacobs P.., Koehn M. L.2006. Implementing a standardized testing program: preparing students for the NCLEX-RN. Journal of Professional Nursing. 22(6):373–379.

Kim J. J.., Kang H. S.., Park S. A.., Song J. H.., Lee S. J.., Lee J. S., et al. 2002. Standards of item development for the Korean national nurse's license examination. Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors.

Kim J. J.., Lee H. R.., Song J. H.., Lee S. J.., Kang H. S.., Park S. A., et al. 2004. Development of the basic core test items of national nurse's license examination. Journal of Educational Evaluation for Health Professions. 1(1):27–36.

Kim M. S.., Song H. J.., Kim B. H.2000. A study on the development of test items standard of national nurse's license examination. National Health Personnel Licensing Examination Board Report.

Lee H. R.., Kim J. J.., Lee S. J.., Park H. R.., Lee I. S.., Kim H. J., et al. 2005. A study of the validity of the Korean nurses' licensing examination. Journal of Educational Evaluational for Health Professions. 2(1):31–42.

McGahee J.2009. How to read and really use an item analysis. Nurse Educator. 34(4):166–171.

Oh G. S.2006. A study of globalization for Korean nurse license examination. Institution of Health Policy in Yonsei University, Seoul.

Smith J. E.., Crawford L. H.2002. The link between entry-level RN practice and the NCLEX-RN (R) examination. Nurse Education. 27(3):109–112.

Song R. Y.., Shin S. J.., Suh Y. O.., Shin S. R.., Park Y. H.., Kang Y. H., et al. 2011. The future direction of learning objectives and national nurse's licensing examination in adult health nursing. Korean Journal of Adult Nursing. 23(5):503–513.

Spanier A.1988. Issues. National Council of State Boards of Nursing. 9(2):1–2. , 6-8.

Yoon S. N.2005. How to cope with international migration among nurses. Report from the health policy forum. Department of Health and Social Welfare. 37–42.