Korean J Urol.  2006 Aug;47(8):866-869. 10.4111/kju.2006.47.8.866.

Inaccuracy in Ultrasonographic Measurement of the Testicular Volume in Children

• Cha MH
• Ahn BC
• Kim YS

• KMID: 2294116
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2006.47.8.866

Abstract

PURPOSE: For the measurement of testicular volume, we tried to evaluate the differences between the 1) ultrasonographic and intraoperative ruler measurements, 2) the performances by a radiologist and urologic residents and also 3) the difference among the various formulas for volume calculation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The sizes of 108 testes of 96 children (mean age: 4) were measured preoperatively for the length (L) and width (W) with using ultrasonography by a radiologist. These testes were also measured intraoperatively for the L, W and thickness (T) with using a ruler. Of the 108 testes, 57 testes were also scanned with using ultrasonography by urologic residents to measure the L, W and T. The testicular volumes were calculated with three different formulas: LxW2x0.52 (F1), LxWxTx0.52 (F2) and LxWxTx0.71 (F3).
RESULTS
The mean volumes of the 108 testes measured with ultrasonography by the radiologist and with a ruler were 0.27+/-0.2ml vs. 0.87+/-0.56ml, respectively (p<0.001). The mean difference between the volumes measured with ultrasonography and a ruler was 0.61+/-0.47ml. The mean volume of 57 testes measured with ultrasonography by the urologic residents was not significantly different from that measured by a radiologist (p=0.235), and it was also smaller than the volume measured with an intraoperative ruler (p<0.001).
CONCLUSIONS
The testicular volume in children was much underestimated by ultrasonography with statistical significance. Therefore, the possibility of underestimation must be considered in clinical settings. The testicular volumes measured with ultrasonography by the radiologist and by the urologic residents had no significant difference.

Keyword

Ultrasonography; Testis; Volume; Children

MeSH Terms

Child*
Humans
Testis
Ultrasonography

Figure

• 

  Fig. 1 Measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography. The calipers measure testicular length (A) and width (B). Testicular volumes are calculated by using the formula: volume=LxW2x0.52 (formula for a prolate spheroid). Black arrow: epididymis, white arrow: tunica albuginea.

• 

  Fig. 2 Comparison of the ultrasonographic and intraoperative ruler measurements of 108 testes. US: ultrasonography, rad: single pediatric radiologist, Vol.: volume, F1: LxW2x0.52 (formula for a prolate spheroid).

Reference

1. Sigman M, Jarow JP. Walsh PC, Retik AB, Vaughan ED, Wein AJ, editors. Male infertility. Campbell's urology. 2002. 8th ed. Philadelphia: Saunders;1475–1531.

2. Kim DS, Kim SC, Kim JI, Ryu SB, Park YY, Park WK. Urology. 2001. 3rd ed. Seoul: Korea Publishing Inc;509.

3. Takihara H, Cosentino MJ, Sakatoku J, Cockett AT. Significance of testicular size measurement in andrology: II. correlation of testicular size with testicular function. J Urol. 1987. 137:416–419.

4. Rivkees SA, Hall DA, Boepple PA, Crawford JD. Accuracy and reproducibility of clinical measures of testicular volume. J Pediatr. 1987. 110:914–917.

5. Taskinen S, Taavitsainen M, Wikstrom S. Measurement of testicular volume: comparison of 3 different methods. J Urol. 1996. 155:930–933.

6. Paltiel HJ, Diamond DA, Canzio JD, Zurakowski D, Borer JG, Atala A. Testicular volume: comparison of orchidometer and US measurements in Dogs. Radiology. 2002. 222:114–119.

7. Takihara H, Sakatoku J, Fujii M, Nasu T, Cosentino MJ, Cockett AT. Significance of testicular size measurement in andrology. I. A new orchiometer and its clinical application. Fertil Steril. 1983. 39:836–840.

8. Schiff JD, Li PS, Goldstein M. Correlation of ultrasonographic and orchidometer measurements of testis volume in adults. BJU Int. 2004. 93:1015–1017.

9. Taskinen S, Taavitsainen M, Wikstrom S. Measurement of testicular volume: comparison of 3 different methods. J Urol. 1996. 155:930–933.

10. Behre HM, Nashan D, Nieschlag E. Objectve measurement of testicular volume by ultrasonography: evaluation of the technique and comparison with orchidometer estimates. Int J Androl. 1989. 12:395–403.

11. Lambert B. The frequency of mumps and of mumps orchitis and the consuquences for sexuality and fertility. Acta Genet Stat Med. 1951. 2:Suppl 1. 1–166.