Korean J Urol.
2005 Nov;46(11):1173-1179.
The Initial Experience of Intraprostatic Injection of Botulinum Toxin Type A for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Comparative Study of Short-term Effect with Transurethral Resection of Prostate
- Affiliations
-
- 1Department of Urology, College of Medicine, Pochon CHA University, Bundang CHA Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. dsparkmd@cha.ac.kr
Abstract
-
PURPOSE: To retrospectively compare the results of botulinum toxin type A (BTA) with those of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hypertrophy (BPH) and to evaluate the effect of BTA.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
The changes of symptom after BTA injection into prostate (BIP) and TURP in 26 patients treated with BIP and 81 patients treated with TURP were analysed retrospectively. All BPH-related medications were stopped immediately after BTA administration. To evaluate the effect of BIP, the parameters such as International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life (QoL), prostate-specific antigen (PSA), prostate volume, post-void residual urine and maximum flow rate were measured both before and 1 month after BIP.
RESULTS
In both groups, IPSS and QoL were improved significantly after treatment, but the effectiveness of TURP was much superior to that of BIP. Among the patients with a prostate volume under 40ml, IPSS was improved by 27.5% in the BTA group and 38% in the TURP group. QoL was improved by 31.8% in the BTA group and 51% in the TURP group, but the difference between the two groups was not statistically significant. Among the patients with a prostate volume over 40ml, IPSS was improved by 24.7% in the BTA group and 47.6% in the TURP group. QoL was improved by 18.9% in the BTA group and 44.4% in the TURP group, and the difference was statistically significant between the two groups.
CONCLUSIONS
Although both BIP and TURP significantly improved the clinical outcome, the latter was far superior to the former in improving voiding symptoms caused by BPH. However, BIP can be a new therapeutic option for patients with a small prostate volume or who want more minimally invasive treatment.