J Breast Cancer.  2010 Jun;13(2):174-179. 10.4048/jbc.2010.13.2.174.

Characteristics of Invasive Micropapillary Carcinoma of the Breast: In Comparison with Invasive Ductal Carcinoma

Affiliations
  • 1Division of Breast and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. paojlus@hanmail.net

Abstract

PURPOSE
Invasive micropapillary carcinoma (IMPC) of the breast is a rare and associated with high incidence of lymph node metastasis and poor outcome. The aims of this study were to provide a comprehensive analysis of clinicopathologic and immunohistochemical characteristics of IMPC and to elucidate the differences between IMPC and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC).
METHODS
Sixty-one patients of IMPC were identified by retrospective review of database from January 2004 to December 2008. 221 patients were randomly selected among the IDC patients who received operation during the same period. Two groups were compared with uni- and multivariate analysis.
RESULTS
We observed significant differences in mean number of metastatic lymph nodes (6.1 vs. 1.9, p=0.001), positivity of lymph node (70.5% vs. 45.2%, p<0.001), and presence of lymphatic vessel invasion (75.4% vs. 34.8%, p<0.001) between IMPC and IDC patients. Although it has been known that triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) have lymphotropic tendency in their early T stage, 11.8% (26/221) of IDC and 3.3% (2/61) of IMPC patients were TNBC in this study (p=0.050). In multivariate analysis, IMPC histology showed no correlation with disease-free survival (DFS) and the lymphatic vessel invasion was a significant predictor of DFS.
CONCLUSION
The results of this study confirm that IMPC is unique subtype of breast cancer that is commonly accompanied by axillary lymph node metastasis and shows poor outcome, although it rarely presents the pattern of TNBC. Lymphatic vessel invasion rather than histology of IMPC seems to be more closely related to DFS.

Keyword

Breast; Carcinoma; Lymphatic metastasis; Prognosis

MeSH Terms

Breast
Breast Neoplasms
Carcinoma, Ductal
Disease-Free Survival
Glycosaminoglycans
Humans
Incidence
Lymph Nodes
Lymphatic Metastasis
Lymphatic Vessels
Multivariate Analysis
Neoplasm Metastasis
Prognosis
Retrospective Studies
Glycosaminoglycans

Figure

  • Figure 1 Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Photomicrograph reveals carcinoma composed of small clusters of tumor cells within the clear stromal spaces (H&E stain, ×100).


Reference

1. Siriaunkgul S, Tavassoli FA. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol. 1993. 6:660–662.
2. Zekioglu O, Erhan Y, Ciris M, Bayramoglu H, Ozdemir N. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: high incidence of lymph node metastasis with extranodal extension and its immunohistochemical profile compared with invasive ductal carcinoma. Histopathology. 2004. 44:18–23.
Article
3. Paterakos M, Watkin WG, Edgerton SM, Moore DH 2nd, Thor AD. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: a prognostic study. Hum Pathol. 1999. 30:1459–1463.
4. Nassar H, Wallis T, Andea A, Dey J, Adsay V, Visscher D. Clinicopathologic analysis of invasive micropapillary differentiation in breast carcinoma. Mod Pathol. 2001. 14:836–841.
Article
5. Walsh MM, Bleiweiss IJ. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: eighty cases of an underrecognized entity. Hum Pathol. 2001. 32:583–589.
Article
6. Kim MJ, Gong G, Joo HJ, Ahn SH, Ro JY. Immunohistochemical and clinicopathologic characteristics of invasive ductal carcinoma of breast with micropapillary carcinoma component. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2005. 129:1277–1282.
Article
7. Luna-More S, Casquero S, Perez-Mellado A, Rius F, Weill B, Gornemann I. Importance of estrogen receptors for the behavior of invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Review of 68 cases with follow-up of 54. Pathol Res Pract. 2000. 196:35–39.
Article
8. Pettinato G, Manivel CJ, Panico L, Sparano L, Petrella G. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast: clinicopathologic study of 62 cases of a poorly recognized variant with highly aggressive behavior. Am J Clin Pathol. 2004. 121:857–866.
9. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA, et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007. 13:4429–4434.
Article
10. Singletary SE, Connolly JL. Breast cancer staging: working with the sixth edition of the AJCC Cancer Staging Manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2006. 56:37–47.
Article
11. Elston CW, Ellis IO. Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up. Histopathology. 1991. 19:403–410.
Article
12. Fisher ER, Palekar AS, Redmond C, Barton B, Fisher B. Pathologic findings from the National Surgical Adjuvant Breast Project (protocol no. 4). VI. Invasive papillary cancer. Am J Clin Pathol. 1980. 73:313–322.
Article
13. Yu JH, Kim SW, Han WS, Kim SW, Park IA, Youn YK, et al. Micropapillary carcinoma of breast. J Korean Breast Cancer Soc. 2004. 7:132–135.
Article
14. Luna-More S, Gonzalez B, Acedo C, Rodrigo I, Luna C. Invasive micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. A new special type of invasive mammary carcinoma. Pathol Res Pract. 1994. 190:668–674.
15. Middleton LP, Tressera F, Sobel ME, Bryant BR, Alburquerque A, Grases P, et al. Infiltrating micropapillary carcinoma of the breast. Mod Pathol. 1999. 12:499–504.
16. Beck T, Weller EE, Weikel W, Brumm C, Wilkens C, Knapstein PG. Usefulness of immunohistochemical staining for p53 in the prognosis of breast carcinomas: correlations with established prognosis parameters and with the proliferation marker, MIB-1. Gynecol Oncol. 1995. 57:96–104.
Article
17. Haffty BG, Yang Q, Reiss M, Kearney T, Higgins SA, Weidhaas J, et al. Locoregional relapse and distant metastasis in conservatively managed triple negative early-stage breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2006. 24:5652–5657.
Article
18. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, Andre F, Tordai A, Mejia JA, et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008. 26:1275–1281.
Article
19. Tan DS, Marchio C, Jones RL, Savage K, Smith IE, Dowsett M, et al. Triple negative breast cancer: molecular profiling and prognostic impact in adjuvant anthracycline-treated patients. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2008. 111:27–44.
Article
Full Text Links
  • JBC
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr