Korean J Perinatol.  2013 Sep;24(3):180-186. 10.14734/kjp.2013.24.3.180.

Comparison of Obstetric and Neonatal Outcomes According to Oral Glucose Challenge Test in Korean Pregnant Women

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, National Health Insurance Corporation Ilsan Hospital, Goyang-si, Korea. raksumi10@gmail.com
  • 2Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, CHA University, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
The purpose of the study was to compare obstetric and perinatal outcomes according to glucose challenge test (GCT) in a single institution.
METHODS
One thousand six women, who were underwent antepartum gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening by a GCT in mid-pregnancy and delivered at National Health Service between January 1, 2007 and July 31, 2012, were included in the study. The medical records of patients were analyzed retrospectively. The Subjects were categorized into three groups according to the results of 50 g oral GTC and 100 g oral GTC; normal glucose tolerance (NGT, n=826), less than 140 mg/dL; gestational impaired glucose tolerance (GIGT, n=128), more than 140 mg/dL but non-GDM ; gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM, n=52). Pre-existed maternal DM or hypertension and twin pregnancy were excluded. Obstetric and perinatal outcomes were compared among the three groups.
RESULTS
Maternal age, parity, and pre-pregnancy body mass index were higher in the GDM. The preterm delivery and gestational hypertension increased across the groups from NGT to GIGT to GDM (13.9% vs. 18.8% vs. 25.0%, P<0.01, and 1.9% vs.5.5% vs. 13.5%, P<0.01, respectively). Large for gestational age (LGA) and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit admission rate were higher in order in NGT, GIGT, and GDM (6.2% vs. 15.6% vs. 15.4%, P<0.01, and 12.3% vs. 24.2% vs. 38.5%, P<0.01), but other complications requiring intensive care were not different among the groups, including meconium aspiration syndrome and birth asphyxia.
CONCLUSION
GDM was a risk factor of cesarean section, preterm delivery, and gestational hypertension. In addition, GIGT was positively correlated with gestational hypertension, preterm labor, cesarean section rate, and LGA. This study suggests that there is a need to develop a guideline for Korean pregnant women who were diagnosed with GIGT.

Keyword

Gestational diabetes mellitus; Glucose challenge test; Pregnancy outcomes

MeSH Terms

Asphyxia
Body Mass Index
Cesarean Section
Diabetes, Gestational
Female
Gestational Age
Glucose*
Humans
Hypertension
Hypertension, Pregnancy-Induced
Infant, Newborn
Critical Care
Intensive Care, Neonatal
Mass Screening
Maternal Age
Meconium Aspiration Syndrome
Medical Records
National Health Programs
Obstetric Labor, Premature
Parity
Parturition
Pregnancy
Pregnancy Outcome
Pregnancy, Twin
Pregnant Women*
Retrospective Studies
Risk Factors
Glucose

Cited by  2 articles

Late Preterm Infants' Outcome Born from Mothers with Positive Screening but Negative Diagnostic Test for Gestational Diabetes
Jeong Min Lee, Bo Seon Seo, Eun Sun Kim
Korean J Perinatol. 2015;26(3):200-207.    doi: 10.14734/kjp.2015.26.3.200.

Abdominal skin subcutaneous fat thickness over the gestational period in Korean pregnant women: a descriptive observational study
Moon Sook Hwang
Korean J Women Health Nurs. 2021;27(4):318-325.    doi: 10.4069/kjwhn.2021.12.12.


Reference

1). Metzger BE., Coustan DR. Summary and recommendations of the Fourth International Workshop-Conference on Gestational Diabetes Mellitus. The Organizing Committee. Diabetes Care. 1998. 21(Suppl 2):B161–7.
2). American Diabetes Association: Gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 2000. 23(Suppl1):77–9.
3). Moore TR. Diabetes in pregnancy. Creasy RK, Resnik R, Iams JD, editors. editors.Maternal-Fetal medicine. Principles and practice. 5th ed.Philadelphia: Saunders;2004. p. 1023–61.
Article
4). Narayan KM., Boyle JP., Thompson TJ., Sorensen SW., Williamson DF. Lifetime risk for diabetes mellitus in the United States. JAMA. 2003. 290:1884–90.
Article
5). Classification and diagnosis of diabetes mellitus and other categories of glucose intolerance. National Diabetes Data Group. Diabetes. 1979. 28:1039–57.
6). Crowther CA., Hiller JE., Moss JR., McPhee AJ., Jeffries WS., Robinson JS. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005. 352:2477–86.
Article
7). Sheffield JS., Butler-Koster EL., Casey BM., McIntire DD., Leveno KJ. Maternal diabetes mellitus and infant malformations. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 100:925–30.
Article
8). Silverman BL., Rizzo TA., Cho NH., Metzger BE. Long-term effects of the intrauterine environment. The Northwestern University Diabetes in Pregnancy Center. Diabetes Care. 1998. 21(Suppl 2):B142–9.
9). Lobner K., Knopff A., Baumgarten A., Mollenhauer U., Ma-rienfeld S., Garrido-Franco M, et al. Predictors of postpartum diabetes in women with gestational diabetes. Diabetes. 2006. 55:792–70.
10). Kjos SL., Buchanan TA. Gestational diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1999. 341:1749–56.
Article
11). Kang HJ., Kwak HM., Kim YS., Park JS., Yoon G., Oh SY, et al. Obstetric and neonatal outcomes after treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus class A1 and class A2. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2010. 53:681–6.
Article
12). Sim KS., Lee HS., Bai JW., Cha SH., Jung SJ. A Clinical observation on infants of diabetic mother. Kor J Perinatol. 1995. 6:421–8.
13). Kim SH., Kim PS., Yuk JS., Oh SO., Park CH., Hong SY, et al. Comparative study of maternal and perinatal complications in overt and gestational diabetes. Kor J Perinatol. 2004. 15:274–80.
14). Retnakaran R., Qi Y., Connelly PW., Sermer M., Zinman B., Hanley AJ. Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and postpartum risk of metabolic syndrome in young women, J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010. 95:670–7.
15). Retnakaran R., Qi Y., Sermer M., Connelly PW., Hanley AJ., Zinman B. Glucose intolerance in pregnancy and future risk of pre-diabetes or diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2008. 31:2026–31.
Article
16). Seo K., Park YW., Park CK. Birthweight distribution by gestational age and constructing cut off value for fetal growth retardation (FGR); their statistical consideration. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 1989. 32:530–40.
17). Lucas MJ., Lowe TW., Bowe L., McIntire DD. Class A1 gestational diabetes: a meaningful diagnosis? Obstet Gynecol. 1993. 82:260–5.
18). Sheffield JS., Butler-Koster EL., Casey BM., McIntire DD., Leveno KJ. Maternal diabetes mellitus and infant malformations. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. 100:925–30.
Article
19). Metzger BE., Coustan DM. Organizing committee: summary and recommendations of the fourth international workshop-conference on gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Care. 1998.
20). Ryu JW., Rho YH., Han SW., Ha HY., Kim EH. The pros and cons of different modes of delivery at a single institution. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2011. 54:279–85.
Article
21). Werner EF., Savitz DA., Janevic TM., Ehsanipoor RM., Thung SF., Funai EF, et al. Mode of delivery and neonatal outcomes in preterm, small-for-gestational-age newborns. Obstet Gynecol. 2012. 120:560–4.
Article
22). Caren GS., Steven WG., Michael FG., Ellen WS. Glucose intolerance as a predictor of hypertension in pregnancy. Hypertension. 1994. 23:717–21.
Article
23). Johnson SR., Kolberg BH., Vance MW., Railsback LD. Maternal obesity and pregnancy. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1987. 164:431–7.
Article
24). Ehrenberg HM., Mercer BM., Catalano PM. The influence of obesity and diabetes on the prevalence of macrosomia. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004. 191:964–8.
Article
25). Turok DK., Ratcliffe SD., Baxley AG. Management of gestational diabetes mellitus. Am Fam Physician. 2003. 68:1769–72.
26). Xiang AH., Peters RK., Trigo E., Kjos SL., Lee WP., Buchanan TA. Multiple metabolic defects during late pregnancy in women at high risk for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes. 1999. 48:848–54.
27). Catalano PM., Huston L., Amini SB., Kalhan SC. Longitudinal changes in glucose metabolism during pregnancy in obese women with normal glucose tolerance and gestational diabetes. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1999. 180:903–16.
28). Oded L., Yariv Y., Elly MJ., Loid B. Overweight and obese in gestational diabetes: The impact on pregnancy outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005. 192:1768–76.
Full Text Links
  • KJP
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr