Korean J Obstet Gynecol.  2011 Jan;54(1):53-56. 10.5468/KJOG.2011.54.1.53.

Sustained fetal sinus bradycardia after maternal cardioversion

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kyungpook National University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea. duchess7@naver.com

Abstract

Direct current cardioversion is reported as a safe procedure during pregnancy. However, the impact of cardioversion on fetal haemodynamics remains unclear. A 28-year-old woman at 10 2/7 weeks of gestation developed shortness of breath while walking. Under the confirmation of atrial flutter by a 12-lead electro-cardiogram, synchronized shock was proceeded at 17 weeks of gestation and the maternal heart rhythm was converted to sinus rhythm. After 3 months, the baseline of fetal heart rate decreased to 110 beats per minute. Fetal bradycardia was aggravated at term, and caesarean section was performed. Following caesarean section, the infant made a full recovery. Although cardioversion during pregnancy is known to be safe, monitoring of fetal heart rate during maternal cardioversion is advisable considering the possibility of severe fetal bradycardia and loss of variability.

Keyword

Maternal cardioversion; Fetal bradycardia; Arrhythmia

MeSH Terms

Adult
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
Atrial Flutter
Bradycardia
Cesarean Section
Dyspnea
Electric Countershock
Female
Heart
Heart Rate, Fetal
Humans
Infant
Morphinans
Pregnancy
Shock
Walking
Morphinans

Figure

  • Fig. 1 At 29 3/7 weeks of gestation, pulse doppler exam revealed decreased fetal heart rate to 114 beats/min.

  • Fig. 2 At 37 1/7 weeks of gestation, fetal monitoring showed aggravated fetal bradycardia and decreased variability.

  • Fig. 3 Nineteen days after birth, neonatal echocardiography showed slightly quickening blood flow of ascending aorta and focal stenotic lesion of aorta was not revealed.


Reference

1. Chun CS, Yang JI, Lee K, Lee YH, Cho DJ. A clinical study of heart disease in pregnancy. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 1994. 37:227–232.
2. Park HW, Kim SY, Park SH, Lee HY, Rho HS, Oh HM. The perinatal outcomes of pregnant women with cardiac disease. Korean J Obstet Gynecol. 2007. 50:1313–1320.
3. Ferrero S, Colombo BM, Ragni N. Maternal arrhythmias during pregnancy. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2004. 269:244–253.
4. Barnes EJ, Eben F, Patterson D. Direct current cardioversion during pregnancy should be performed with facilities available for fetal monitoring and emergency caesarean section. BJOG. 2002. 109:1406–1407.
5. Nora JJ, Nora AH. Maternal transmission of congenital heart diseases: new recurrence risk figures and the questions of cytoplasmic inheritance and vulnerability to teratogens. Am J Cardiol. 1987. 59:459–463.
6. Wyse RK, Robinson PJ, Deanfield JE, Tunstall Pedoe DS, Macartney FJ. Use of continuous wave Doppler ultrasound velocimetry to assess the severity of coarctation of the aorta by measurement of aortic flow velocities. Br Heart J. 1984. 52:278–283.
7. Ino T, Nishimoto K, Kato H, Momma K, Ishizawa A, Kamiya T, et al. Balloon angioplasty for aortic coarctation-report of a questionnaire survey by the Japanese Pediatric Interventional Cardiology Committee. Jpn Circ J. 1997. 61:375–383.
8. Wang YC, Chen CH, Su HY, Yu MH. The impact of maternal cardioversion on fetal haemodynamics. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2006. 126:268–269.
9. Ueland K, McAnulty JH, Ueland FR, Metcalfe J. Special considerations in the use of cardiovascular drugs. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1981. 24:809–823.
10. Sánchez Díaz CJ, González Carmona VM, Ruesga Zamora E, Monteverde Grether CA. Electric cardioversion in the emergency service: experience in 1000 cases. Arch Inst Cardiol Mex. 1987. 57:387–394.
Full Text Links
  • KJOG
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr