Ann Rehabil Med.  2015 Apr;39(2):163-169. 10.5535/arm.2015.39.2.163.

Accuracy of Needle Placement in Cadavers: Non-Guided Versus Ultrasound-Guided

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. ljikyh@catholic.ac.kr

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To compare the accuracy rates of non-guided vs. ultrasound-guided needle placement in four lower limb muscles (tibialis posterior, peroneus longus, and short and long heads of the biceps femoris).
METHODS
Two electromyographers examined the four muscles in each of eight lower limbs from four fresh frozen cadavers. Each electromyographer injected an assigned dye into each targeted muscle in a lower limb twice (once without guidance, another under ultrasound guidance). Therefore, four injections were done in each muscle of one lower limb. All injections were performed by two electromyographers using 18 gauge 1.5 inch or 24 gauge 2.4 inch needles to place 0.5 mL of colored acryl solution into the target muscles. The third person was blinded to the injection technique and dissected the lower limbs and determined injection accuracy.
RESULTS
A 71.9% accuracy rate was achieved by blind needle placement vs. 96.9% accuracy with ultrasound-guided needle placement (p=0.001). Blind needle placement accuracy ranged from 50% to 93.8%.
CONCLUSION
Ultrasound guidance produced superior accuracy compared with that of blind needle placement in most muscles. Clinicians should consider ultrasound guidance to optimize needle placement in these muscles, particularly the tibialis posterior.

Keyword

Cadaver; Electromyography; Ultrasound; Tibialis posterior; Biceps femoris

MeSH Terms

Cadaver*
Electromyography
Head
Humans
Lower Extremity
Muscles
Needles*
Ultrasonography

Figure

  • Fig. 1 The tibialis anterior (TA), extensor digitorum longus (EDL), and tibialis posterior (TP) are presented on an ultrasound-guided needle placement image (transverse) of the tibialis posterior. Needle (arrow) passed through the TA and interosseous membrane (arrow head), and injectate placed into the tibialis posterior.

  • Fig. 2 Photograph of a dissected cadaver with incorrectly placed injectate (yellow and red) into the soleus. The needle passed under the intended tibialis posterior target and into the soleus. TP, tibialis posterior; FDL, flexor digitorum longus; S, soleus.


Cited by  1 articles

Which Approach Is Most Optimal for Needle Electromyographic Examination of the Biceps Femoris Short Head: Medial or Lateral?
Jong Heon Park, Im Joo Rhyu, Ha Kyoung Lim, Jae Hyun Cha, Gi Jun Shin, Hye Chang Rhim, Dong Hwee Kim
Ann Rehabil Med. 2021;45(1):42-48.    doi: 10.5535/arm.20092.


Reference

1. Boon AJ, Oney-Marlow TM, Murthy NS, Harper CM, McNamara TR, Smith J. Accuracy of electromyography needle placement in cadavers: non-guided vs. ultrasound guided. Muscle Nerve. 2011; 44:45–49. PMID: 21674520.
Article
2. Haig AJ, Goodmurphy CW, Harris AR, Ruiz AP, Etemad J. The accuracy of needle placement in lower-limb muscles: a blinded study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84:877–882. PMID: 12808542.
3. Cho KH, Gee SJ, Lee HJ, Hwang SH. Comparision of blind technique and ultrasonography guided technique of subacromial subdeltoid bursa injection. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2010; 34:209–213.
4. Smith J, Hurdle MF, Locketz AJ, Wisniewski SJ. Ultrasound-guided piriformis injection: technique description and verification. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006; 87:1664–1667. PMID: 17141652.
Article
5. Boon AJ, Alsharif KI, Harper CM, Smith J. Ultrasound-guided needle EMG of the diaphragm: technique description and case report. Muscle Nerve. 2008; 38:1623–1626. PMID: 19016552.
Article
6. Perotto AO, Delagi EF. Anatomical guide for the electromyographer: the limbs and trunk. 4th ed. Springfield: Charles C Thomas;2005.
7. Preston DC, Shapiro BE. Electromyography and neuromuscular disorders: clinical-electrophysiologic correlations. 2nd ed. Philadelphia: Butterworth-Heinemann;2005.
8. Schnitzler A, Roche N, Denormandie P, Lautridou C, Parratte B, Genet F. Manual needle placement: accuracy of botulinum toxin A injections. Muscle Nerve. 2012; 46:531–534. PMID: 22987693.
Article
9. Rha DW, Im SH, Lee SC, Kim SK. Needle insertion into the tibialis posterior: ultrasonographic evaluation of an anterior approach. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010; 91:283–287. PMID: 20159135.
Article
10. Semple R, Murley GS, Woodburn J, Turner DE. Tibialis posterior in health and disease: a review of structure and function with specific reference to electromyographic studies. J Foot Ankle Res. 2009; 2:24. PMID: 19691828.
Article
11. Yang SN, Lee SH, Kwon HK. Needle electrode insertion into the tibialis posterior: a comparison of the anterior and posterior approaches. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008; 89:1816–1818. PMID: 18760169.
Article
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr