Asian Oncol Nurs.  2012 Sep;12(3):204-212. 10.5388/aon.2012.12.3.204.

The Effects and Variances of the Critical Pathway of Laparoscopic Colon Resection in Colon Cancer Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System, Seoul, Korea. adoze@yuhs.ac
  • 2Yonsei University College of Nursing, Seoul, Korea.
  • 3Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract

PURPOSE
To investigate the effectiveness and variance of a critical pathway (CP) for laparoscopic colon resection in colon cancer patients, and nurses'satisfaction with the CP.
METHODS
A CP for laparoscopic colon resection was applied to the CP-group that included 50 patients, who underwent elective colon resection between March and May, 2011. The non-CP group included 51 patients who had the same operation without the CP applied from March to May, 2010.
RESULTS
The means of length of hospital stay were 11.7 and 7.3 days (p<.001) and the lengths of postoperative hospital stay were 8.6 and 5.1 days (p<.001) in the non-CP group and CP group, respectively. There was no significant difference between two groups for total healthcare costs, pain score, complications, or emergency room visits within 30 days after discharge. By examining variances of the CP, there were 162 variances and the most frequent cause was patient's condition. Nurses'satisfaction with the use of CP was favorable and the mean score of satisfaction was 3.76 on the 5 point Likert scale.
CONCLUSION
There are clear benefits to use of CP, resulting in standardized and effective patient care. In conclusion, analysis of variance data can assist in evaluating and revising CP for optimal care and reducing variances.

Keyword

Critical Pathways; Colonic Neoplasms; Analysis of Variance

MeSH Terms

Analysis of Variance
Colon
Colonic Neoplasms
Critical Pathways
Emergencies
Health Care Costs
Humans
Length of Stay
Patient Care

Cited by  3 articles

The Effect of Post-operative Exercise in Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT) Study
Ji-hee Min, Ki-yong Ahn, Hyuna Park, Wonhee Cho, Hye Jeong Jung, Nam Kyu Kim, Justin Y Jeon
Asian Oncol Nurs. 2017;17(1):29-36.    doi: 10.5388/aon.2017.17.1.29.

Development and Evaluation of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Program for Patients with Colorectal Cancer Surgery
Eun Ja Kim, Jeong Sook Park
Korean J Adult Nurs. 2019;31(6):677-690.    doi: 10.7475/kjan.2019.31.6.677.

Factors Affecting Discharge Delay in Lumbar Spinal Surgery Patients Who were Treated according to a Critical Pathway
Jeoung Hee Kim, Eun Ha Lee, Su Ran Kim, Sung Reul Kim
Korean J Adult Nurs. 2016;28(1):43-52.    doi: 10.7469/kjan.2016.28.1.43.


Reference

1. Donabedian A. The quality of care. How can it be assessed. JAMA. 1988. 260:1743–1748.
Article
2. Darer J, Pronovost P, Bass EB. Use and evaluation of critical pathways in hospitals. Eff Clin Pract. 2002. 5:114–119.
3. Kurtin P, Stucky E. Standardize to excellence: improving the quality and safety of care with clinical pathways. Pediatr Clin North Am. 2009. 56:893–904.
Article
4. Allen D, Gillen E, Rixson L. Systematic review of the effectiveness of integrated care pathways: what works, for whom, in which circumstances? Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2009. 7(2):61–74.
5. Coffey RJ, Richards JS, Remmert CS, LeRoy SS, Schoville RR, Baldwin PJ. An introduction to critical paths. Qual Manag Health Care. 2005. 14(1):46–55.
Article
6. Kim EK, Chang HS. Critical pathway. 2001. Seoul: Korea Health Industry Development Institute.
7. Lee DH. Development and application of critical pathway for patients undergoing endoscopic colonic polypectomy [dissertation]. 2007. Seoul: Korea Univ..
8. Chang CH. Effects of critical pathway for hysterectomy patients [dissertation]. 2004. Seoul: Yonsei Univ..
9. Sung YH. Development of a case management model and its application: for the laminectomy patients [dissertation]. 2000. Seoul: Chung-Ang Univ..
10. Hwang SJ. An effect of the decrease in length of stay in a millitary hospital [dissertation]. 2004. Seoul: Seoul National Univ..
11. Hunter B, Segrott J. Re-mapping client journeys and professional identities: a review of the literature on clinical pathways. Int J Nurs Stud. 2008. 45:608–625.
Article
12. Cheah J. Development and implementation of a clinical pathway programme in an acute care general hospital in Singapore. Int J Qual Health Care. 2000. 12:403–412.
Article
13. Song YH. The effects of a critical pathway of appendectomy in patients on a military hospital [dissertation]. 2002. Seoul: Yonsei Univ..
14. Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Von Meyenfeldt M, Revhaug A, Dejong CH, Lassen K, et al. Enhanced recovery after surgery: a consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clin Nutr. 2005. 24:466–477.
Article
15. Hurt LW. Care management: providing a connecting link. Nurs Manage. 1995. 26(11):27–33.
Article
16. Delaney CP, Fazio VW, Senagore AJ, Robinson B, Halverson AL, Remzi FH. 'Fast track' postoperative management protocol for patients with high co-morbidity undergoing complex abdominal and pelvic colorectal surgery. Br J Surg. 2001. 88:1533–1538.
Article
17. Kim EO, Kwon SM. Effects of a standardized critical pathway in gastrectomy patients in a general hospital. Korean J Hosp Manage. 2004. 9(3):128–142.
18. Kiyama T, Tajiri T, Yoshiyuki T, Mitsuhashi K, Ise Y, Mizutani T, et al. Clinical significance of a standardized clinical pathway in gastrectomy patients. J Nippon Med Sch. 2003. 70:263–269.
Article
19. Rotter T, Kugler J, Koch R, Gothe H, Twork S, van Oostrum JM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the effects of clinical pathways on length of stay, hospital costs and patient outcomes. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008. 8:265–279.
Article
20. Rotter T, Kinsman L, James E, Machotta A, Gothe H, Willis J, et al. Clinical pathways: effects on professional practice, patient outcomes, length of stay and hospital costs. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010. (3):CD006632.
Article
21. Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011. (2):CD007635.
Article
22. Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009. 24:1119–1131.
Article
23. Kong JH. Development of case management system during hospitalization and analysis of management effect: focused on patients with laminectomy [dissertation]. 2004. Seoul: Yonsei Univ..
24. Joh YG, Lee JE, Yoo SH, Kim SH, Jeong GY, Chung CS, et al. The effects of a standardized postoperative enhanced recovery program after a laparoscopic colorectal resection in regard to patients' recovery and clinical outcomes. J Korean Soc Coloproctol. 2010. 26:225–232.
Article
25. Steele DJ, Hamilton E, Arnaout MA. A case management model to improve hemodialysis outpatient outcomes. Hemodial Int. 2007. 11:247–251.
Article
26. Cohen EL, Cesta TG. Case management in the acute care setting. A model for health care reform. J Case Manag. 1994. 3:110–116.
27. Gurzick M, Kesten KS. The impact of clinical nurse specialists on clinical pathways in the application of evidence-based practice. J Prof Nurs. 2010. 26(1):42–48.
Article
28. Shin EY. Nursing case management program development for the elderly at hospital [dissertation]. 2002. Seoul: Seoul National Univ..
29. Chung KH, Joo JL, Chang HS. The effect of Critical Pathway on the patients with Cesarean section. J Korean Acad Nurs Adm. 2006. 6:211–225.
Full Text Links
  • AON
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr