Skip Navigation
Skip to contents

Ann Rehabil Med.  2012 Feb;36(1):88-97. 10.5535/arm.2012.36.1.88.

Comparison of Sono-guided Capsular Distension with Fluoroscopically Capsular Distension in Adhesive Capsulitis of Shoulder

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Gachon University of Medicine and Science, Gil Medical Center, Incheon 405-760, Korea.
  • 2Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul 134-701, Korea.
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 133-791, Korea.
  • 4Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Sanggye Paik Hospital, Inje University College of Medicine, Seoul 139-707, Korea. swc328@naver.com

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To investigate the short-term effects and advantages of sono-guided capsular distension, compared with fluoroscopically guided capsular distension in adhesive capsulitis of shoulder. METHOD: In this prospective, randomized, and controlled trial, 23 patients (group A) were given an intra-articular injection of a mixture of 0.5% lidocaine (9 ml), contrast dye (10 ml), and triamcinolone (20 mg); they received the injection once every 2 weeks, for a total of 6 weeks, under sono-guidance. Twenty-five patients (group B) were treated similarly, under fluoroscopic guidance. Instructions for the self-exercise program were given to all subjects, without physiotherapy and medication. Effects were then assessed using a visual numeric scale (VNS), and the shoulder pain and disability index (SPADI), as well as a range of shoulder motion examinations which took place at the beginning of the study and 2 and 6 weeks after the last injection. Incremental cost-effective ratio (ICER), effectiveness, preference, and procedure duration were evaluated 6 weeks post-injection.
RESULTS
The VNS, SPADI, and shoulder motion range improved 2 weeks after the last injection and continued to improve until 6 weeks, in both groups. However, no statistical differences in changes of VNS, SPADI, ROM, and effectiveness were found between these groups. Patients preferred sono-guided capsular distension to fluoroscopically guided capsular distension due to differences in radiation hazards and positional convenience. Procedure time was shorter for sono-guided capsular distension than for fluoroscopically guided capsular distension.
CONCLUSION
Sono-guided capsular distension has comparable effects with fluoroscopically guided capsular distension for treatment of adhesive capsulitis of the shoulder. Sono-guided capsular distension can be substituted for fluoroscopic capsular distension and can be advantageous from the viewpoint of radiation hazard mitigation, time, cost-effectiveness and convenience.

Keyword

Sono-guided; Fluoroscopically; Capsular distension; Adhesive capsulitis

MeSH Terms

Adhesives
Bursitis
Humans
Hypogonadism
Injections, Intra-Articular
Lidocaine
Mitochondrial Diseases
Ophthalmoplegia
Prospective Studies
Shoulder
Shoulder Pain
Triamcinolone
Adhesives
Hypogonadism
Lidocaine
Mitochondrial Diseases
Ophthalmoplegia
Triamcinolone
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2026 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr