Ann Rehabil Med.  2013 Aug;37(4):461-470. 10.5535/arm.2013.37.4.461.

The Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Lower Limb Spasticity in Subacute Stroke Patients

Affiliations
  • 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine and Institute of Health Sciences, Gyeongsang National University Graduate School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea. solioh21@naver.com
  • 2Department of Neurology, Gyeongsang National University Graduate School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea.
  • 3Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Samcheonpo Seoul Hospital, Seoul, Korea.

Abstract


OBJECTIVE
To evaluate the effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on lower limb spasticity in subacute stroke patients.
METHODS
We studied thirty hemiplegic subacute stroke patients with ankle plantar flexor spasticity. ESWT was applied for 1 session/week, with a total of 3 sessions at the musculotendinous junction of medial and lateral gastrocnemius muscles. Patients were evaluated both clinically and biomechanically at baseline, after sham stimulation, and at immediately 1 week and 4 weeks after ESWT. For clinical assessment, Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS), clonus score, passive range of motion of ankle, and Fugl-Myer Assessment for the lower extremity were used. A biomechanical assessment of spasticity was conducted by an isokinetic dynamometer. Two parameters, peak eccentric torque (PET) and torque threshold angle (TTA), were analyzed at the velocities of 60degrees/sec, 180degrees/sec, and 240degrees/sec.
RESULTS
After sham stimulation, there were no significant changes between each assessment. MAS and PET (180degrees/sec and 240degrees/sec) were significantly improved immediately and 1 week after ESWT. However, these changes were not significant at 4 weeks after ESWT. PET (60degrees/sec) and TTA (60degrees/sec, 180degrees/sec, and 240degrees/sec) were significantly improved immediately after ESWT. Yet, these changes were not significant at 1 week and 4 weeks after ESWT as well.
CONCLUSION
Lower limb spasticity in subacute stroke patients was significantly improved immediately after ESWT. Although the therapeutic effect of ESWT reduced with time and therefore was not significant at 4 weeks after ESWT, the degree of spasticity was lower than that of the baseline. Future studies with a larger sample of patients are warranted in order to verify the protocols which can optimize the effect of ESWT on spasticity.

Keyword

High-energy shock waves; Muscle spasticity; Stroke

MeSH Terms

Animals
Ankle
High-Energy Shock Waves
Humans
Lower Extremity
Muscle Spasticity
Muscles
Range of Motion, Articular
Salicylamides
Shock
Stroke
Torque
Salicylamides

Figure

  • Fig. 1 Outline of treatment session with data collection. All patients were evaluated at baseline, after sham stimulation, and at immediately 1 week and 4 weeks after extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT).

  • Fig. 2 Patient's posture of biomechanical assessment using the Biodex system isokinetic dynamometer.

  • Fig. 3 Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) of ankle plantar flexor before and after treatment. MAS was significantly improved immediately and 1 week after extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT), but was not significantly changed at 4 weeks after ESWT. *Statistically significant compared with baseline (p<0.05).

  • Fig. 4 Peak eccentric torque (PET) of ankle plantar flexor before extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and after sham stimulation, and at immediately 1 week and 4 weeks after ESWT. *Statistically significant compared with baseline (p<0.05).

  • Fig. 5 Torque threshold angle (TTA) of ankle plantar flexor before extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) and after sham stimulation, and at immediately 1 week and 4 weeks after ESWT. *Statistically significant compared with baseline (p<0.05).


Cited by  4 articles

Effect of Radial Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy on Hemiplegic Shoulder Pain Syndrome
Sung Hwan Kim, Kang Wook Ha, Yun Hee Kim, Pyong-Hwa Seol, Ho-Jun Kwak, Seung-Wan Park, Byung-Ju Ryu
Ann Rehabil Med. 2016;40(3):509-519.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2016.40.3.509.

Effective Site for the Application of Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Therapy on Spasticity in Chronic Stroke: Muscle Belly or Myotendinous Junction
Sang Ho Yoon, Min Kyung Shin, Eun Jung Choi, Hyo Jung Kang
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(4):547-555.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.547.

Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy Versus Trigger Point Injection in the Treatment of Myofascial Pain Syndrome in the Quadratus Lumborum
Jin Oh Hong, Joon Sang Park, Dae Geun Jeon, Wang Hyeon Yoon, Jung Hyun Park
Ann Rehabil Med. 2017;41(4):582-588.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2017.41.4.582.

Duration of Treatment Effect of Extracorporeal Shock Wave on Spasticity and Subgroup-Analysis According to Number of Shocks and Application Site: A Meta-Analysis
Jae Ho Oh, Hee Dong Park, Seung Hee Han, Ga Yang Shim, Kyung Yeul Choi
Ann Rehabil Med. 2019;43(2):163-177.    doi: 10.5535/arm.2019.43.2.163.


Reference

1. Lance JW. What is spasticity? Lancet. 1990; 335:606. PMID: 1968597.
Article
2. Mori F, Koch G, Foti C, Bernardi G, Centonze D. The use of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) for the treatment of spasticity. Prog Brain Res. 2009; 175:429–439. PMID: 19660671.
Article
3. Stevenson VL. Rehabilitation in practice: spasticity management. Clin Rehabil. 2010; 24:293–304. PMID: 20360150.
Article
4. Valchanou VD, Michailov P. High energy shock waves in the treatment of delayed and nonunion of fractures. Int Orthop. 1991; 15:181–184. PMID: 1743828.
Article
5. Wang CJ, Yang KD, Wang FS, Chen HH, Wang JW. Shock wave therapy for calcific tendinitis of the shoulder: a prospective clinical study with two-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2003; 31:425–430. PMID: 12750138.
6. Rompe JD, Theis C, Maffulli N. Shock wave treatment for tennis elbow. Orthopade. 2005; 34:567–570. PMID: 15886855.
7. Rompe JD. Shock-wave therapy for plantar fasciitis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005; 87:681–682. PMID: 15786568.
Article
8. Manganotti P, Amelio E. Long-term effect of shock wave therapy on upper limb hypertonia in patients affected by stroke. Stroke. 2005; 36:1967–1971. PMID: 16109905.
Article
9. Sohn MK, Cho KH, Kim YJ, Hwang SL. Spasticity and electrophysiologic changes after extracorporeal shock wave therapy on gastrocnemius. Ann Rehabil Med. 2011; 35:599–604. PMID: 22506181.
Article
10. Bae H, Lee JM, Lee KH. The effects of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on spasticity in chronic stroke patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2010; 34:663–669.
11. Yoo SD, Kim HS, Jung PK. The effect of shock wave therapy on upper limb spasticityin the patients with stroke. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2008; 32:406–410.
12. Duncan PW, Propst M, Nelson SG. Reliability of the Fugl-Meyer assessment of sensorimotor recovery following cerebrovascular accident. Phys Ther. 1983; 63:1606–1610. PMID: 6622535.
Article
13. Lee SJ, Han TR. A quantitative assessment of spasticity in hemiplegic patients using isokinetic dynamometer. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 1998; 22:784–792.
14. Mariotto S, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Ciampa AR, de Prati AC, Marlinghaus E, et al. Extracorporeal shock waves: from lithotripsy to anti-inflammatory action by NO production. Nitric Oxide. 2005; 12:89–96. PMID: 15740982.
Article
15. Leone JA, Kukulka CG. Effects of tendon pressure on alpha motoneuron excitability in patients with stroke. Phys Ther. 1988; 68:475–480. PMID: 3353457.
Article
16. Mariotto S, de Prati AC, Cavalieri E, Amelio E, Marlinghaus E, Suzuki H. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy in inflammatory diseases: molecular mechanism that triggers anti-inflammatory action. Curr Med Chem. 2009; 16:2366–2372. PMID: 19601786.
Article
17. Mariotto S, Menegazzi M, Suzuki H. Biochemical aspects of nitric oxide. Curr Pharm Des. 2004; 10:1627–1645. PMID: 15134561.
Article
18. Kenmoku T, Ochiai N, Ohtori S, Saisu T, Sasho T, Nakagawa K, et al. Degeneration and recovery of the neuromuscular junction after application of extracorporeal shock wave therapy. J Orthop Res. 2012; 30:1660–1665. PMID: 22457214.
Article
19. Mirbagheri MM, Barbeau H, Ladouceur M, Kearney RE. Intrinsic and reflex stiffness in normal and spastic, spinal cord injured subjects. Exp Brain Res. 2001; 141:446–459. PMID: 11810139.
20. Fellows SJ, Ross HF, Thilmann AF. The limitations of the tendon jerk as a marker of pathological stretch reflex activity in human spasticity. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1993; 56:531–537. PMID: 8505646.
Article
21. Given JD, Dewald JP, Rymer WZ. Joint dependent passive stiffness in paretic and contralateral limbs of spastic patients with hemiparetic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995; 59:271–279. PMID: 7673955.
Article
22. Amelio E, Manganotti P. Effect of shock wave stimulation on hypertonic plantar flexor muscles in patients with cerebral palsy: a placebo-controlled study. J Rehabil Med. 2010; 42:339–343. PMID: 20358168.
Article
23. Vidal X, Morral A, Costa L, Tur M. Radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy (rESWT) in the treatment of spasticity in cerebral palsy: a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial. NeuroRehabilitation. 2011; 29:413–419. PMID: 22207070.
Article
24. Kim DY, Park CI, Na SI, Park YS. Quantitative assessment of the effect of tizanidine on spasticity in stroke patients. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2003; 27:471–479.
25. Blackburn M, van Vliet P, Mockett SP. Reliability of measurements obtained with the Modified Ashworth Scale in the lower extremities of people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2002; 82:25–34. PMID: 11784275.
Article
26. Odeen I, Knutsson E. Evaluation of the effects of muscle stretch and weight load in patients with spastic paraplegia. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1981; 13:117–121. PMID: 7347432.
27. Lee SJ, Kwon BS, Park CH. The effect of passive stretching on the spasticity of ankle plantar flexor muscles. J Korean Acad Rehabil Med. 2001; 25:987–992.
Full Text Links
  • ARM
Actions
Cited
CITED
export Copy
Close
Share
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Similar articles
Copyright © 2024 by Korean Association of Medical Journal Editors. All rights reserved.     E-mail: koreamed@kamje.or.kr