Ann Dermatol.  2014 Dec;26(6):700-705. 10.5021/ad.2014.26.6.700.

The Suitability of Gray-Scale Electronic Readers for Dermatology Journals

• Choi JE
• Kim DH
• Seo SH
• Kye YC
• Ahn HH

• KMID: 2264864
• DOI: http://doi.org/10.5021/ad.2014.26.6.700

Abstract

BACKGROUND
The rapid development of information and communication technology has replaced traditional books by electronic versions. Most print dermatology journals have been replaced with electronic journals (e-journals), which are readily used by clinicians and medical students.
OBJECTIVE
The objectives of this study were to determine whether e-readers are appropriate for reading dermatology journals, to conduct an attitude study of both medical personnel and students, and to find a way of improving e-book use in the field of dermatology.
METHODS
All articles in the Korean Journal of Dermatology published from January 2010 to December 2010 were utilized in this study. Dermatology house officers, student trainees in their fourth year of medical school, and interns at Korea University Medical Center participated in the study. After reading the articles with Kindle 2, their impressions and evaluations were recorded using a questionnaire with a 5-point Likert scale.
RESULTS
The results demonstrated that gray-scale e-readers might not be suitable for reading dermatology journals, especially for case reports compared to the original articles. Only three of the thirty-one respondents preferred e-readers to printed papers. The most common suggestions from respondents to encourage usage of e-books in the field of dermatology were the introduction of a color display, followed by the use of a touch screen system, a cheaper price, and ready-to-print capabilities.
CONCLUSION
In conclusion, our study demonstrated that current e-readers might not be suitable for reading dermatology journals. However, they may be utilized in selected situations according to the type and topic of the papers.

Keyword

Dermatology; Electronic readers; E ink display; Gray-scale

MeSH Terms

Academic Medical Centers
Surveys and Questionnaires
Dermatology*
Humans
Korea
Schools, Medical
Students, Medical
Surveys and Questionnaires

Reference

1. Lee S. An integrated adoption model for e-books in a mobile environment: Evidence from South Korea. Telemat Inform. 2013; 30:165–176.

2. Vasileiou M, Hartley R, Rowley J. An overview of the e-book marketplace. Online Inform Rev. 2009; 33:173–192.

3. Griffey J. Electronic book readers. Libr Technol Rep. 2010; 46:8–19.

4. Folb BL, Wessel CB, Czechowski LJ. Clinical and academic use of electronic and print books: the Health Sciences Library System e-book study at the University of Pittsburgh. J Med Libr Assoc. 2011; 99:218–228.

5. Fraser L, Gunasekaran S, Mistry D, Ward VM. Current use of and attitudes to e-learning in otolaryngology: questionnaire survey of UK otolaryngology trainees. J Laryngol Otol. 2011; 125:338–342.

6. Morton DA, Foreman KB, Goede PA, Bezzant JL, Albertine KH. TK3 eBook software to author, distribute, and use electronic course content for medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 2007; 31:55–61.

7. Raynor M, Iggulden H. Online anatomy and physiology: piloting the use of an anatomy and physiology e-book-VLE hybrid in pre-registration and post-qualifying nursing programmes at the University of Salford. Health Info Libr J. 2008; 25:98–105.

8. De Groote SL, Dorsch JL. Measuring use patterns of online journals and databases. J Med Libr Assoc. 2003; 91:231–240.

9. De Groote SL, Shultz M, Doranski M. Online journals' impact on the citation patterns of medical faculty. J Med Libr Assoc. 2005; 93:223–228.

10. Kanthraj GR. Newer insights in teledermatology practice. Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol. 2011; 77:276–287.

11. Ahn HH, Kim JE, Ko NY, Seo SH, Kim SN, Kye YC. Videoconferencing journal club for dermatology residency training: an attitude study. Acta Derm Venereol. 2007; 87:397–400.

12. Perednia DA, Brown NA. Teledermatology: one application of telemedicine. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1995; 83:42–47.

13. Kanthraj GR. Classification and design of teledermatology practice: what dermatoses? Which technology to apply? J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2009; 23:865–875.

14. Hanson AH, Krause LK, Simmons RN, Ellis JI, Gamble RG, Jensen JD, et al. Dermatology education and the Internet: traditional and cutting-edge resources. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011; 65:836–842.

15. Krejci-Papa NC, Bittorf A, Diepgen T, Huntley A. Dermatology on the Internet. A source of clinical and scientific information. J Dermatol Sci. 1996; 13:1–4.

16. Wainwright BD. Clinically relevant dermatology resources and the Internet: An introductory guide for practicing physicians. Dermatol Online J. 1999; 5:8.

17. Fischer S, Stewart TE, Mehta S, Wax R, Lapinsky SE. Handheld computing in medicine. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2003; 10:139–149.

18. Grasso MA, Yen MJ, Mintz ML. Survey of handheld computing among medical students. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2006; 82:196–202.

19. Richardson JV Jr, Mahmood K. eBook readers: user satisfaction and usability issues. Libr Hi Tech. 2012; 30:170–185.